Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BP Cut Tax Bill by $13B Due to Losses From Spill
FOX ^ | 04/22/11 | Judson Berger

Posted on 04/22/2011 11:42:25 AM PDT by Doogle

Despite causing an historic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year, BP plans to reduce its tax bill by almost $13 billion by writing off its losses.

The move is legal and above board. But with millions of Americans having just settled up with the IRS for 2010, it's causing consternation among activists who say BP shouldn't be offsetting its losses with federal money -- especially when Washington is in a budget crunch.

"The U.S. taxpayer shouldn't be ... footing the bill for this. That just seems insane to me," said Aaron Viles, deputy director of the Gulf Restoration Network.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: robbery; thugs
Dumbo still holds 16 billion of the original 20 billion he blackmailed BP for......once again the MSM has no interest
1 posted on 04/22/2011 11:42:33 AM PDT by Doogle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doogle

More redistribution.


2 posted on 04/22/2011 11:43:33 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

I wonder how much BP is losing in Libya even after bribing Britian to let that terroist go back to Libya.


3 posted on 04/22/2011 11:47:38 AM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Yeah, I was going to say, this is their reward for handing Obama a $20 billion slush fund.


4 posted on 04/22/2011 11:48:56 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
I wonder how much BP is losing in Libya even after bribing Britian to let that terroist go back to Libya.

Not nearly enough.

5 posted on 04/22/2011 11:49:01 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

This is a non-story. They lost tens of billions so they had no income, just losses. Why is it controversial?


6 posted on 04/22/2011 11:51:51 AM PDT by mewykwistmas ("The last time the French asked for 'more proof,' it came marching into Paris under a German flag.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

was just thinking the same thing when I heard the ‘Rebels’ had set up their own central bank and was selling oil to China.
LOL


7 posted on 04/22/2011 11:53:54 AM PDT by griswold3 (Character is destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Duh; left-wingers make a point of not knowing tax code, arithmetic or business or common sense.

BP is shelling out billions to fix the problem they caused which pushes them into running at a loss for a bit of time. You don’t pay taxes on a loss, just on profit.

I’m so tired of reporters and editors presenting misleading stories. The headline should have simply read the left-wing are idiots.


8 posted on 04/22/2011 11:55:14 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Despite causing an historic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year, BP plans to reduce its tax bill by almost $13 billion by writing off its losses.

If they didn't make it on a net basis, how can they pay taxes on it?

I'm sure there are some in Washington active in finding a way for companies to pay taxes on nothing..

9 posted on 04/22/2011 11:55:38 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Please see the link to the following article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/16/AR2010061605529_2.html?sid=ST2010061604991

It appears that BP has been very wise with the arrangement for the 20 Billion.

“Moreover, the deal with the White House lets BP spread out its payments to the fund. The biggest chunks will come up front: $3 billion in the third quarter, $2 billion in the fourth quarter and then $1.25 billion a quarter until the full amount is paid in three years. To provide a guarantee that it will make those payments, the company said it is “setting aside” $20 billion of U.S. assets; as it makes payments, those assets will be freed up. BP will continue to earn money on those assets, but the government will effectively have a lien on them.”

If this is the case, and I have no other news reports to the contrary, BP’s Gulf Coast Claims Facility has paid out close to to four billion. Rather than a 20 Billion dollar fund it's actually more like a 6.25 Billion Dollar fund to date

10 posted on 04/22/2011 11:59:11 AM PDT by Deepest South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
Please see the link to the following article:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/16/AR2010061605529_2.html?sid=ST2010061604991

It appears that BP has been very wise with the arrangement for the 20 Billion.

“Moreover, the deal with the White House lets BP spread out its payments to the fund. The biggest chunks will come up front: $3 billion in the third quarter, $2 billion in the fourth quarter and then $1.25 billion a quarter until the full amount is paid in three years. To provide a guarantee that it will make those payments, the company said it is “setting aside” $20 billion of U.S. assets; as it makes payments, those assets will be freed up. BP will continue to earn money on those assets, but the government will effectively have a lien on them.”

If this is the case, and I have no other news reports to the contrary, BP’s Gulf Coast Claims Facility has paid out close to to four billion. Rather than a 20 Billion dollar fund it's actually more like a 6.25 Billion Dollar fund to date

11 posted on 04/22/2011 11:59:11 AM PDT by Deepest South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen
“BP shouldn't be offsetting its losses with federal money — especially when Washington is in a budget crunch.”

Typical left wing viewpoint. It's not “federal money”. All money does not belong to the gubmint. Washington is in a budget crunch because there is too much Washington.

12 posted on 04/22/2011 12:04:16 PM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

This thinking is insane. It’s not the government’s money that’s being doled out. The Gulf Restoration idiot needs to learn that if you have a profit, you pay taxes. If you screw up and don’t make money, you don’t pay taxes. The government didn’t shell out one dime. They just didn’t collect as much tax because BP made less money.


13 posted on 04/22/2011 12:18:57 PM PDT by Cousin Eddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
The move is legal and above board.

End of story.............

14 posted on 04/22/2011 12:19:19 PM PDT by Red Badger (Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Heck, BP should have been able to write off 20 billion, just for having to deal with that White hating Black bastard presently contaminating the White House.


15 posted on 04/22/2011 12:20:54 PM PDT by Gator113 (GAME ON. I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
You can tax "turnover" ~ "gross income" ~ "excess reserves".

That's quite enough ~ plenty of ways to tax folks who lost money.

16 posted on 04/22/2011 1:13:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson