Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN investigation: 'No doubt' President Obama was born in Hawaii (Media rushes to help Teflon Obama)
CNN ^ | 4-26-11 | Susan Chun

Posted on 04/26/2011 1:37:32 PM PDT by Mozilla

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie famously said he wanted to put the Obama birther issue to rest in December of last year, after he was elected into office. He wanted to show the world the President's original birth certificate.

"Obviously I'm going to do what's legally possible," he told CNN's Ed Henry on December 27 last year. But it's not legally possible for the Governor to release private records of the President or any other Hawaiian citizen except for his own.

Since then, Abercrombie has been silent on this issue. But he spoke to CNN in part 2 of the AC360 Investigation in Hawaii. In an emotional interview, he talked about his memories of President Obama as an infant in Honolulu. Abercrombie, a Democrat, was friends with both Barack Obama Senior and Ann Dunham at the University of Hawaii, and remembers celebrating the birth of their son.

"Of course, we had no idea at the time that the future president of the United States was that little boy, that little baby, and we are very, very happy of course that that took place," Abercrombie told CNN.

Even though the Hawaii governor cannot release President Obama's original birth certificate, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of the Department of Health under Republican Governer Linda Lingle has inspected the document, which is stored in a vault in the Department of Health Building. Dr. Fukino has examined the document twice and in her first on camera interview, tells CNN the document is "absolutely" authentic.

Though there is much focus on the President's original birth certificate, the CNN investigation shows that the certification of live birth released by President Obama in 2008 is the same certificate that is issued to every Hawaiian.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; mediabias; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-63 last
To: mjp

Stig Waidelich was born on August 5, 1961 in the Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu, where President Obama says he was born.
medical records?
name of physician?
names of any other staff present?

If these were available, they would have been leaked by now.Where are any witnesses?

Does he have a short form COLB listing one of his parents race as African?

51 posted on 04/26/2011 2:51:16 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

OK..we get it. He can’t release anyone’s birth certificate. Only the person can get their own certificate.

Step up, Obama. Release the birth certificate. This game is getting old.

My guess is either there is no birth certificate in Hawaii or something is unusual on the birth certificate like nothing in father’s name space or “born Communist/Marist.”

52 posted on 04/26/2011 3:12:28 PM PDT by hummingbird (Save Guam from Tilting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

cnn home of the baby milk factory bombing..

53 posted on 04/26/2011 3:13:54 PM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForAmerica

That’s an excellent point, and may be one that’s worth pursuing. It’s the same genre of slip-up that got Dan Rather caught.

54 posted on 04/26/2011 3:43:18 PM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

It is not settled Obama and CNN....

Not no way...
Not no how...

That was my best cowardly lion impression Mr Obama, but you would not know foreign usurping anti-American lying no good so and so turd ball lousy greasy whitey hating Marxist loving grandma jean wearing communist from God knows what country!

I need a drink...

55 posted on 04/26/2011 5:23:19 PM PDT by astratt7 (obama,muslim,politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

My point is that even if he produces the legal birth certificate it doesn’t mean that he is a Natural Born Citizen. It is pretty clear to me that he has either traveled on a Indonesian or British Passport and that his father was not a US Citizen. How can he be a Natural Born Citizen if his father was not a citizen?

The failure of the Supreme Court to take up the issue is unexcusable. Either we are a nation of laws or we are not. To me it is clear the Constitution does not mean anything any longer.

56 posted on 04/26/2011 5:52:55 PM PDT by CollegeRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla

He is not a natural born citizen as the constitution says he needs to be

57 posted on 04/26/2011 5:56:37 PM PDT by Garvin (When it comes to my freedom, there will be no debate. There will be a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmet

And just why would nobama do anything “for the good of the country”?

nobama hates you, hates your children, hates Free America, hates Americans, hates the Constitution and hates the Bill of Rights. nobama is a hate crime foisted upon America. nobama is the Destroyer.

Everything nobama does is intentional.

58 posted on 04/26/2011 5:58:32 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CollegeRepublican
We're pretty close to the point where the viability of the Constitution will be a state-by-state issue. I think we're pretty close to every state for itself because the Federal Government has abandoned the Constitution.

In a way, it's not surprising because the Constitution is fundamentally antagonistic to government. Sooner or later it was going to come back to what are we the people gong to do about it. I think people that love our country and our Constitution will need to coalesce in states like Idaho that are being to nullify unconstitutional acts of the Federal Government.

59 posted on 04/26/2011 6:27:00 PM PDT by Jim 0216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
"Still no actual proof.

Not true. We have actual PROOF that there is a usurper in the White House just based upon what we already KNOW to be the facts, even without the birth certificate.

Fact Number One
Congress is REQUIRED to ensure that the President elect is eligible for the office or they must name a replacement if the Vice President elect is also ineligible. (Twentieth Amendment, section three)

”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”

Fact Number Two
The burden of proof is on the President elect to prove eligibility. The sequence of words from section three stating "if the President elect shall have failed" is describing an action by the "President elect" that he failed at.

Fact Number Three
The eligibility requirements in Article Two, section one clearly state that NO PERSON who fails to meet the eligibility requirements can serve as President. "No Person" leaves absolutely no wiggle room for anyone who might possibly fool his way into being sworn in through fraudulent representation or Congressional neglect in enforcing section three of the Twentieth amendment.

" No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Fact Number Four
Since Congress must act if the President elect fails to qualify, Congress must be made aware of whether they must act or not. This means that a legal "qualification" is fully known by Congress and that there is no mystery whether someone was eligible to serve or not. That is, if that "qualification" was made.

Fact Number Five
We have mystery about the eligibility of the person currently calling himself "President". Nothing but mystery.

Fact Number Six
Since we have "mystery" this means that a "qualification" was NOT made and thus the President elect has "failed to qualify" and cannot be serving legally as President.

Fact Number Seven
"We have no birth certificate" EQUALS "We have a usurper".

Fact Number Eight
It is the duty of Congress to immediately address this issue as per section three of the Twentieth amendment or they are breaking their oath of office from Article Six to "support this Constitution".

Add up the facts and we have usurpation along with a Congress unwilling to address it.

60 posted on 04/26/2011 7:19:10 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Riley
"That’s an excellent point, and may be one that’s worth pursuing. It’s the same genre of slip-up that got Dan Rather caught."

Thanks, I don't know why this is not an issue?

I was born in the 70's and my father's race is listed as negro, but then again that's on my long form, I've never heard of a "short form" until the Marxist was runing for POTUS!
61 posted on 04/26/2011 8:36:25 PM PDT by ForAmerica (Conservative Christian Black Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ForAmerica
I've never heard of a "short form" until the Marxist was runing for POTUS!

Neither did I. As far as I know, there's the real, actual birth certificate, or there's some other document for bureaucratic convenience that serves the same function for people who...weren't born somewhere where birth certificates are issued, I guess.

62 posted on 04/27/2011 3:54:26 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ForAmerica

Why is this new document stamped April 25 2011?

63 posted on 04/27/2011 7:29:20 AM PDT by freebird5850 (Of course Obama loves his's just that Sarah Palin loves mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson