Popcorn time again. :-)
Posted on 04/27/2011 6:13:29 AM PDT by null and void
Just announced. Obama to speak in 45 minutes. (6:45 AM PST)
If, as you noted earlier, that the signature on your CoLB from Hawaii shows the same name as BHO, and looks to be a stamp, why would they not use the same stamp for her's as well?
Ms. Nordyke was born 8/5. Her number is 61 10637
Obama was born 8/4/61- His number is 61 10641.
Actually, the DOB is unimportant here, in regard to the file number discrepancy. If they were sent over and processed on the same day, they could have been alphabetized before going to the registrar, which would allow for the "anomaly".
What is important to my query is the date that the registrations took place. Obama's CoLB was registered three days before Nordyke's. That tells me that they were NOT sent from the hospital to the registrar's office at the same time, so the alphabetic shuffling I noted would probably not apply. Unless the file number is not assigned until they are filed, which seems pretty lax even for Hawaii...
I should say that I take no sides on this whole "is he or isn't he a naturalized citizen" thing. I'm more interested in making sure there is someone OTHER than Obama takes the oath of office on the Capitol steps come 1/20/2012 than worrying about whether he's legally eligible to be more than an invited guest to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. My interest in this discussion is based on the illogical inconsistencies shown by this latest "revelation" from the regime in Washington.
It was transcribed/posted here a few days ago. I’ll dig around and find it.
The big problem I see with this is that if this “new” COLB has been altered to be appropriately PC, it makes it invalid for identity purposes as there is an invalidation statement included on at least one of the COLBs.
Another question I have regarding this doc is, since it appears to be a photocopy from a log-book set over security paper, and the Registrar’s stamp is on the underlying paper, could this doc be photocopied over another valid “official document” so as to include the stamp? Remember that previous COLBs offered had the stamp on the ^reverse^ side, not the front.
Can you post a link with it as a PDF file with instructions. If so and it checks out, then we can all send it out to everyone. Also post it on facebook with instructions. Let it go viral!
That's because the guy whose registrar number is 61 10641 is the only one born around that time period who is now dead and his BC wasn't in use.
Are you talking about Dr. Toru Nishigaya? There was some discussion of him on FR earlier this year. Didn’t he supposedly help Ann Dunham on some immigration issue?
I’m trying to go back and retrieve all this, but it’s not easy.
BTW, these letters are from BOTH written sigs.
Thanks, you can see the seal?
Popcorn time again. :-)
I thought only crazies were bringing the issue up. Why would the President bother addressing the issue if it isn’t a valid one?
For many years HOSPITALS used to give out certificates with time of birth, weight, height, etc; and the cute little foot prints. They quit doing that because to many people thought those were the actual birth certificates and they were being forged. Those were never OFFICIAL birth certificates.
I think Alan Commie Colmes broke down the FOX studio doors to get his face on camera this morning!
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
Here is the PDF, If you blow it up 2400 very interesting blocking on letters.
I thought he said that. Maybe not.
On another thread they talk about the name of the physician being different from the name given on Snopes as the attending physician. I wonder why the difference?
That’s what I thought.
Well there you go... This COLB is B.S.
Does he not have the original? Why not? Did it get lost? Stolen? Why didn't he just say that 3 years ago? I mean, a birth certificate is THE most important document that an (ahem) American Citizen owns, after all.
Know how I know this is just another forgery? Because the word "douchebag" doesn't appear on it anywhere.
The things that I’m curious about with this release:
1. It kinda looks like the same writer(s) entered the dates on both the Nordyke and Obama BC’s.
2. The registration numbers being out of order. I would love to see if other BC’s from that time period might surface to fill in the chronological path.
3. The dropped ‘M’ on the ‘P.M.’ time of birth. Happens nowhere else on the BC ... but also appears on the Nordyke BC in a very similar manner.
4. The ‘security’ background. Perfectly/seamlessly aligned on the right - weirdly rolled out on the left. Given that this is an era of flattop copiers, how did that happen? Why is there such a background at all?
I’m actually not surprised about the white ghosting around the characters — it’s probably an artifcat of a jpg conversion done while converting this to a pdf document. It’s also kinda convenient, for it could indeed mask an edit there.
Overall, fighting this form is probably going to be difficult now — the much easier battle (and who is gonna raise the issue nationally?) is that based on this evidence, Obama’s nationality seems to be British.
No, Dr. David A Sinclair. See my posting history for more information.
I would have to go get mine from the lock box at the bank, but I’m pretty sure my old TX BC does have that info (otherwise I don’t think I would know my weight at birth). It may vary by state. Mine is one of those old copies (my very original given to my parents that they gave me when I got married) that is black with white writing. I also have a later copy I had to get for some reason that has an official seal, I think. Been awhile since I looked at that stuff tho. But then, I haven’t run for President recently.
Google search: who delivered obama
about 41,700,000 results
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.