Posted on 04/27/2011 7:35:08 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss
Why isn't there a dr listed on the certificate?
Let me guess...Dr. Sinclair or what ever his name is, died a few years ago. Just before his death, he reported that all his private medical files were destroyed during a Tsunami in 1964 when his sail boat was sunk or they were destroyed when a long lost bomb from WW II blew up his building.
Actually, another Freeper has already dug up Dr. Sinclair’s obituary. He did die a few years ago.
Actually, another Freeper has already dug up Dr. Sinclair’s obituary. He did die a few years ago.
If The Donald does not make a big stink about this, it means he's a stalking-horse for Hussein, meant to inoculate him from further birth certificate inquiries.
If I Zoom in on the area of the document with the signatures, the signatures pop up first and then the printed or typed text shows up later. Try it!
I’m no expert on PDF files, but there is no way this would happen if the document was scanned then saved as a PDF. The signatures have to be on a different layer. One or the other (or both) were created separately. Something fishy here!
http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/acrobat/articles/lrvid4082_a9.html
Comparing this with the Nordyke COLB, Obama’s is missing this text at the bottom along with signatures:
“THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE IN THE RESEARCH, PLANNING AND STATISTICS OFFICE
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH”
Instead Obama’s has Onaka’s signature stamp indicating that it may also be an ABSTRACT.
It appears from my naked eyes that one document is being superimposed over another document that contains the signature stamp of Alvin Onaka (hint: look at the curling of the left-hand margin of the text field).
Let me be Frank. I agree LOL
Also, in Block 20, the last numeral “1” in “1961” appears much sooner than the rest of the date.
Even more strange is that in Block 18a, “Ann D” appears sooner than the “unham” part of the signature.
Why is the Father’s name spelled incorrectly (single, rather than double “r” in Barack)?
You mean about the same time as Obama’s Granny died?
There are too many folks wanting to be “The New Buckhead.”
I'm willing to believe the signature on the alleged COLB is his mother's signature, forged by someone who has practiced while referring to his mother's signature, or photo shopped from his mother's actual signature. The differences, several of which are noticeable, could easily be explained by natural variation, by changes in style over time, or by the fatigue of giving birth.
Physician - David A Sinclair - B 04 Oct 1921 D 20 Aug 2003 Honolulu, Hi
Ain’t gonna happen. One Buckhead, once in a lifetime. No more.
Any more info on the doctor? Was he an MD or DO? Family practice or Ob/Gyn? How long in practice? Any associated billing info? When was he working and is there any other information at the hospital on how many babies were delivered on that day?
Ha! Good point, but I think they said the doc (allegedly) died in 2003.
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2011/04/27/the-smoking-gun-certer-snark-asm-is-it-real/
The push-back on the alleged image the White House produced this morning has begun in earnest, this time in “snarky” form from TheSmokingGun.com.
Here are the key “snark-astic” questions the site poses:
•If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document’s safety paper be so seamless?
•Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?
•What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant in box 19a?
•In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?
•What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?
•Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity. Note to forgers, however, it is spelled “Ukulele.”
The site is apparently trying to get “ahead of the game” in terms of the scrutiny that this new online image will obviously produce.
But what about Susan Nordyke’s certificate, born one day after Mr. Obama? One can clearly see differences (click image for larger picture):
Susan Nordyke's birth certificate
Bryan Keith Nixon, an associate creative director for an Atlanta-based advertising agency, pulled up the White House-released image in Adobe Illustrator. This is what he found (click on image for larger view):
The layers that compose the White House-released PDF of Mr. Obama's birth certificate (Bryan Keith Nixon)
And attorney Leo Donofrio responded to today’s news by saying that his prediction of a long-form birth certificate has been fulfilled to the potential detriment of certain legal questions, such as parental citizenship (last three paragraphs):
They simply played a better game of chess. And due to this sick game, Obama now sets a precedent that anyone who hates this country, from Osama Bin Laden to Kim Jong Il, can have a child with an American woman and that child can be President. Obama’s defeat of the dual nationality issue, in both the courts and the media, means that the President’s parents do not have to be US citizens. If that is true, then the natural born citizen requirement in Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution is basically rendered meaningless.
If a person born with dual allegiance can be President, then I don’t see the difference between a citizen and a natural born citizen. To become naturalized as a US citizen, one must at least swear an oath of allegiance to the US by renouncing all other allegiances. But a person such as Obama, who was born with dual allegiance is apparently not even required to renounce all previous allegiances under oath.
The BC was a conspiracy theory. The dual nationality issue is a legal question. Obama always controlled the issue of whether or not he would produce the BC. But the legal issue was never under his control. So he exercised as much control over it as possible by allowing the birth certificate to fester casting a huge shadow over his dual allegiance. Well played, sir.
-Phil
twitter.com/trsol
phil [at] therightsideoflife [dot] com
He was an MD. There is also a Obit linked or Drudge...
As to the "no one uses the long form of their bcs, or I've never seen my long form...." my question to them is, did you ever apply for a Passport?"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
