Posted on 04/27/2011 7:39:09 AM PDT by Zakeet
This morning’s White House release of President Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate will, of course, do little to derail the “birther” movement, which will now analyze the document with the kind of verve previously directed toward those Texas Air National Guard memos faxed to CBS from that Kinko’s in Abilene.
So here’s a few nutty points about the birth certificate sure to be seized upon by the nonbelievers:
[Note: Summary of issues immediately raised by TSG]
[Note: list of issues in article ... impossible to list here and still comply with excerpting requirements]
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
This is true of course. Raised seal? This guy has the power to put his head on the currency like a Roman emporer if he wanted to. Hail to the yes he could have a seal made.
Huh? Read the big title text at the top of the document you linked to....
I notice that the Registrar from a few days before this cert. is a different person than “Ucklee” who signed Obama’s!
As in the movie "When Harry met Sally", this is . . .
Intriguing, TigerClaws.
“Good comment though on Smoking Gun: No one has noticed the “M” in P.M. is a small font of a capital M. That would have been impossible on a manual typewriter. The keys could have created only a capital ‘M’ or small ‘m’, but not a smaller version of a capital M. Just sayin’.”
It is plausible to me to think that they may have reserved the term “negro” for what are known today as “African Americans”, using continental designators for “African” or “Indian” or “Oriental”. But I don’t know this to be true.
Couldn’t help noticing that the Nordyke births occurred the day AFTER the Nordyke births. Why aren’t their certificate numbers AFTER his also? I smell a rat.
Sorry. I meant:
Couldn’t help noticing that the Nordyke births occurred the day AFTER the Obama birth. Why aren’t their certificate numbers AFTER his also? I smell a rat.
Nordyke twins born in same hospital but different attendant. Doctor’s name is the only real new information.
Why is SADO signing her name (Stanley) Ann? Didn’t she go by “Stannie” at the time? Never seen her sign that way.
If I were faking a doc though, I’d leave a few things like that in to keep the doubters doubting. Marginalizes them and doc wouldn’t look too ‘perfect’ to be believable. The reals ones are done hastily. And this might be legit. Let the experts weigh in.
Why wasn’t this released two or three years ago? It took 62% of Americans doubting to get a response? Officers going to jail wasn’t enough?
Trump taking credit for the win was a smart move. Libs will be gloating though. No doubt.
Bookmarked, FR style. Bump!
No. For time the form has a build in small “M.” The clerk just typed in “A.” or “P.” Makes sense if they use it on every form.
“Thanks you for stating/showing the obvious....it is NOT an original..”
You’re welcome.
Keep in mind, there is no such race as “African”. This is more of a modern day politically correct term. Besides, there’s lots of white Africans. Just ask those who live in South Africa. The term “African” does nothing to differentiate race.
Also keep in mind, this was in (supposedly) in 1961. The race would have been classified as either “Negro” or “Colored”. I’d like to see other period birth certificates listing “African” as race—like they’ll find even one.
And also don’t forget, the governor of Hawaii, several months ago proclaimed he was releasing the form to save his pal from criticizing—but yet, about a week later admitted the state couldn’t find it. Now—it must be a miracle! Truly magic.
But yet, this one presented as “original” was rubber stamped April 25, 2011 as “official” and even the guy’s name certifying it is rubber stamped—meaning even he didn’t have enough balls to actually sign off on it.
Issue still in play and now I truly believe he is a liar, fraud and an affront to the Constitution.
The answer is different clerks and they worked slower. At least that’s what’s been put forward.
Let them. Their guy flinched.
Wait...the date is 25 April 2011!!!!!
TigerClaws clears up “M” question in post 18. [sorry]
look at post 17 it looks like they all had the small M
Abstract in Merriam/Webster dictionary says:
1c - insufficiently factual
2 - expressing a quality apart from the original
4 - having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content.
Ok, something is bothering me.
The number on Obama’s birth certificate is 10641. Born 4-Augst
The number on the bc link you provided is 10637. Born 5-August
If she was born after him wouldn’t it make sense that her record number be higher than Obama’s?
This was a full court press on this issue. They have the document in hand. CNN runs a TWO PART series. CBS covers the CNN story! Then this press conference.
The only problem with the document would be the people (clerk and delivery doctor). Sure they covered that. Sure everything else is impossible to disprove. Legit? Maybe. Odd he waited years to produce this. But it’s a sharp political move.
Issue was obviously damaging Obama politically or he wouldn’t have responded. What does that show? Trump’s hard-hitting approach is the correct one and it’s useful having Trump taking the heat. Obama can be damaged politically by questioning his odd past. Trump can move on to grades, to the Indonesian records, etc.
BTW, if you look on the various sites a white Xerox copy of the document presented today was given to the press. Hawaii copied it from the volume (presumably) to regular paper. Then used the special watermark paper as well, which you can’t Xerox.
The fact that Hussein’s father was born in Kenya DISQUALIFIES The One as a Natural Born Citizen. The accepted definition of Natural Born is having parents WHO ARE CITIZENS, and being born IN THE U.S. Period.
go to: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/35523
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.