Skip to comments.The Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Show Thread - Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Posted on 04/27/2011 8:11:02 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and hes not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name (thats Rush, for those in Rio Linda),the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! Americas anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo (a little Spanish lingo, there). He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to dothats host. Get ready to what you were born to dothats listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
Good God Almighty. . .are we going to hear Charles and Karl and so assumed elite 'et al' Repubs; wagging their tongues in two years, bemoaning that Trump would have been 'great' - compared to what we are now facing with Emperor Obama?
Let the campaigns begin; and the letters to our Repub Leadership. And hold the money; until they smarten up. Enough of the Informed and Inside the Beltway!
And no wonder or best (Allen West, for example) are saying 'next time'. . .
(Psst: read the course names)
The WKA decision used the same reasoning as the 1844 decision, arguing that WKA met the criteria for a natural born citizen and was thus a citizen of the USA per the Constitution.
I think WKA was a less well documented decision than the 1844 case.
if 2 Mexicans from Mexico only their whole life have a baby in America, can that baby become an American President
thanks in advance
In the first hour monologue, Rush read an email of someone who said the BC could be opened in Adobe Illustrator and shown to be a fake. Does anyone have the transcript of that?
I would like to put one of my graphic artists on that to see if there is any merit to the claim. But I will need the step by step process that was described.
Thanks for helping him. (s)
In the 70s I had a Ford van that was made for ‘Night moves’!!! LOL
“if 2 Mexicans from Mexico only their whole life have a baby in America, can that baby become an American President”
If the 2 Mexicans were here legally, then their child would meet the criteria for a natural born citizen. The DISSENT in WKA argued:
“Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution, I submit that it is unreasonable to conclude that “natural-born citizen” applied to everybody born within the geographical tract known as the United States, irrespective of circumstances, and that the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the Presidency, while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not.”
In the New York case I cited, the person inheriting property as a natural born citizen of the US had been born in NY while her alien parents were here for four years. Her parents never had any intent of making the US their permanent home. She was born in the spring of 1819, and went with her parents to England a few months later, and never lived in the USA after that.
It came from a comment in the Smoking Gun article I believe. I was looking for it too.
“Submitted by Dr.Guru on Wed, 2011-04-27 14:03.
I get a kick out of all the individuals who, when confronted by something disturbing, automatically resort to name-calling. Even worse, is the bevy of ignoramuses I see on the web and news who, working under the mantra of, “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil” condemn others for using critical thought and questioning something instead of blindly following a notion with religious-like faith (there, that should have irritated most every non-thinker on this site). That being said, the posted PDF on the whitehouse.gov site is weapons grade ‘bull-onium”. I am not Adobe certified (who cares), but I do know most of the tricks of the Adobe Creative suite package and use them all the time in forensic work (both in and out of the courtroom setting). The document posted isn’t even a good attempt at a hoax (a real disappointment since one would expect better, even for a fraudulent document). Acrobat does not create multiple layers by default of a scanned image (which is what this is supposed to be), and especially in really convenient locations for editing purposes. A scanned document should consist of a single graphical layer composed of pixels and no vector content. Yet this is not what is seen in the whitehouse.gov PDF file. One can readily remove most of the typewritten text from the document in Adobe Illustrator (an impossibility for a purely honest scanned document) as well as manipulate the dates stamped on it (again separate objects and an impossibility for an honest document). I was easily able to substitute my brother’s name for Obama’s as a proof of principle (and to irritate him). My modified PDF has no structural differences than the one posted by the White House. How can this be??? Even the Adobe Acrobat Pro software indicates that the file has been edited and contains deleted and cropped content. How can you have deleted and cropped content on a purely honest scanned document. You can’t, that’s the point. I now relinquish the dais back to the name-calling.””
Great post...well said Dr. Guru!
Jeez, what a bunch of CONSERVATIVE SOUNDING COURSES he took...that GOLF was the ONLY LIBERAL COURSE he took!! /s
Rush is right.
There are many “new-born again” conservatives do not really understand what a conservative really is or believes.
They are a slave to the “bit*& slap”.
Trump says what they want to here. Frankly he doesn’t have anything to lose by saying it. You can be brave and sound good if you have nothing to lose by saying it.
He would be really no better or worse off if he gets the nomination or not. Others do
I don’t have transcript, but see below related to your question. Many posts on both threads.
Whoa. I was listening to Rush just now...and he was talking about an email he received from someone who said that this document is an obvious fraud...and heres how you can check.
Download the PDF from above and open it in Adobe Illustrator, and you can see all the layers showing how the document was pieced together.
So... I did. I downloaded the file...and opened it in Illustrator...and indeed... this document has been pieced together. Its a layered file. You can click and hide various layers until the screen is blank.
Now... look. Im tired of this stupid argument. I really am. But as a graphic artist, I can tell you that if someone scanned in an image and saved it as a PDF, it would have been a solid, single layer. The only way that I know of for it to be broken down into layers is if it had been manipulated and created digitally.
Feel free to call me a whatever...but see for yourself if what that person Rush mentioned said is right.
849 posted on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:08:58 PM by PowerPro (Conservative Revolution Reborn! Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
See new aphid post #984 on this thread
and related thread on layering I previously cross-posted by RED SOUTH
Obamas Birth Certificate, Dissected
Well....at least it’s STYNE and not the other two Marks...
Wow. That was the second strangest radio show ending I’ve ever heard, second only to Art Bell’s first (of three) retirements, where he said nothing unusual until the last minute of the show, when he simply said he’d decided to retire and that had been his last show. Cut to radio silence. Cue music.
Rush is right, of course. People are lying to us. I can’t wait to hear what he comes up with on Monday.
Did anyone catch the reason that Rush won’t be on tomorrow?
Remember the “4th Hour”? Now it’s lucky just to hear a 4th Day .... geesh
Thank you for getting that info for me. But now it appears it has gone viral. Which is good.
My graphic artist is examining it herself.
He said he’s going to be gone for the next two days (Steyn filling in). He said that due to the stress of the last few days that he has to go and think deeply about where he is and where we are. He ended the show by saying people are lying to us.
I don’t know nothing about Birthing no Certificates...
“My graphic artist is examining it herself.”
That’s what caught my eye about the initial post on the long thread by Freeper PowerPro; he is a graphic artist. Many opinions; few experts.
Then I was pinged to the thread dedicated to the subject.
Please post your GA’s findings to one of those threads.
Actually, I’m a “she”. :)
As to your point, someone else suggested that some scanning software breaks content up if it tries to recognize text. OCR technology.
My question then is, why are some non-text elements, like the pixels at the bottom of the form above the date and the sides of the document...why were they clipped or converted to a layer?
Also... and I don’t really know the answers to these questions and concede there might very well be a non-nefarious reason for these things...
But wouldn’t OCR (text recognition) convert recognized text into text rather than as a clipped image? Or is it only showing up as a clipped image in Illustrator and would show up as editable text in another application?
Today’s show was strange. When Rush was speaking about the BC, there was interference at the station, as if another station was trying to cut in with their music. I couldn’t make out much of what Rush was saying in the background.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.