Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee releasing S.C. team ^

Posted on 04/27/2011 2:05:19 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear

We’ve been told that former Ark. Gov. Mike Huckabee, a rumored candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, is giving his former S.C. supporters the nod to seek work on other presidential campaigns. The word is that he’s told South Carolina staffers that they have his blessing for them to peddle their wares elsewhere. If this is as true as it appears, it’s the second major shakeup. Monday, Miss. Gov. Haley Barbour surprised everyone but himself when he announced that he would not seek the GOP nod.

TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; huckabee; huckabee2012; nevermind; sc2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-187 next last
Comment #121 Removed by Moderator


Comment was NOT focused on Rand. General comment to thread.

122 posted on 04/27/2011 8:10:49 PM PDT by hal ogen (1st amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

Comment #123 Removed by Moderator

To: redgolum
"Makes me wonder what they know. I suspect there is something in the works."

Someone posted on one of the Trump threads, early on, that Trump cut a deal with the Republican party to get the nomination to run against Zero. I haven't been able to find that post again.

124 posted on 04/27/2011 9:10:07 PM PDT by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Maybe they realize the ‘optics’ of a white southern conservative running against Obama were a bit harsh.

125 posted on 04/27/2011 9:16:44 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

Good. One down, one (Mitt) to go...

126 posted on 04/27/2011 9:24:51 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Rand would be fantastic if he gets in. I don’t know that he will, with his dad declaring. Your thoughts?

127 posted on 04/27/2011 9:26:49 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Every day I beg Rep. Allen West to run. I don’t think he is interested, though.

Then he meets my first required qualification.

128 posted on 04/27/2011 10:35:24 PM PDT by Brass Lamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

If it be His will, it will be taken care of…alright?

Did you see him on Hannity tonight?

129 posted on 04/27/2011 11:02:42 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Beware the ENEMEDIA ... Never Again! Support our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Haven’t you heard?


A)It’s a forgery


B)It doesn’t matter, he’s not a citizen no matter where he was born cause his dad was foreign and his mom wasn’t 21 yet.

Can’t wait for the next election. I’m reading a lot about the Canadian election.

130 posted on 04/27/2011 11:33:44 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT; BillyBoy; sickoflibs; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Dengar01; GOPsterinMA; ...

No Huckabee? He’s denying he’s pulling out.

My take

Bachmann - Like her, can she win the GE? She has the potential to win the Iowa caucuses

Bolton - Don’t think he’s going anywhere, I expect a “not running” statement.

Cain - I like him but he’s a very long shot

Daniels - Some things I like, some things I don’t

Gingrich - Come on

Huckubee - (insert Yiddish word)

Johnson - Anathema to social conservatives

Palin - Can she win? Or is the slime they threw on her two thick. Ultimately I think she’ll exit the race. If she doesn’t...

Pawlenty - Meh, he may end up being our non-Mitt option if Palin’s not in.

Paul - Senile

Roemer - That one WTH candidate who no one even remembers. If he lasts till Iowa he’ll get 6 votes. Or let’s nominate him for hell of it! ;d

Romney - The enemy

Trump - Egomaniacal fraud trying to seduce us.

Santorum - Not POTUS timber

I’m unlikely to ‘endorse’ till the wheat is separated from the chaff.

Wish to hell that someone would swoop in. I’d surmise that Allen West or Jim DeMint could grab this thing if they wanted to.

131 posted on 04/28/2011 12:12:24 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Impy
I'm pretty much on the same page. Based on the current list of “likely” candidates, I can't get excited over anyone. I'll wait to see who announces before I take sides. There are a couple I've eliminated as non-starters, but the remaining “acceptable” candidates don't particularly appeal to me. I hope some dark horse jumps into the race who is viable, charmastic, honest, and a good conservative. I'm not seeing that yet. Our field in 2008 was pretty lame, 2012 thus far is more of the same but weaker. It's frustrating because I think Obama is vulnerable if we had a GOOD candidate.

Bachmann - Like Palin but without the controversy. House members are long shots, but I suppose it's better than nothing. Excellent conservative record and nice lady, needs to work on presentation skills.

Bolton - Think he'll run, but not get anywhere in the primaries and drop out early on. Damn shame. His foriegn policy skills are impeccable and he's good on most other issues. No charisma, but he'd rip Obama a new one and show people what a competent leader looks like. Based on the current crop of candidates, I'd probably vote for Bolton if he's still on the ballot by the time Illinois votes, but that's not likely to happen.

Cain - Great guy, needs to have SOME kind of office (elected or appointed) before people will take him seriously as a presidential candidate. The only other way to be a viable presidential candidate is become a general and win a war. Right now, he'll probably get 2% in the primaries. Sorry to bust people's bubble, just being realistic here.

Daniels - Some really good things about him, but other areas make him real problematic. I'd support him if the only other choices were total RINOs (Trump, Giuliani, etc.), but that's not saying much.

Gingrich - Excellent policy wonk behind the scenes. However, terrible, unlikable candidate, and “major league a—hole” to boot. Also too cozy with liberals, even though they despise him. Nominating him would gurantee a second Obama term.

Huckabee - Still think he was superior to Rudy McRomney in 2008. That being said, in 2012 he won't be the fresh new face nationally anymore, and the murder pardon he issued will probably kill his chances. I don't think he'll run, but he'll wait as long as possible before making that announcement.

Gary Johnson - I really liked him when he was Governor. Went against the grain of the GOP establishment by endorsing Forbes, and his fiscal record and commitment to smaller government was far beyond most governors. I would have seriously considered him as a dark horse presidential candidate, until I learned he was pro-abortion and pro-open borders. Damnit! Wrong on at least 2 or 3 of the most important issues. Now I simply can't support him.

Palin - I really like her, but I think she killed her chances when she resigned as Governor and the media has brainwashed voters against her. I was willing to “wait and see” if she connected with voters after resigning, but it seems only the conservative base is willing to listen.

Pawlenty - I was much more willing to consider this guy for POTUS before Al Franken stole the state from under his nose. Pawlenty’s last couple months in office and failure to keep the state in GOP hands (he was succeeded by a terrible incompetent RAT who couldn't even get re-elected Senator) left a bad taste in my mouth. Too milquetoast. Acceptable if he wins the nomination, but not someone I could get excited about in a primary.

Paul - 5%’er. Strange cult-like following and loves the TV cameras. Still unacceptable due to foriegn policy views, though it will be more amusing this time since he'll go after Obama for Libya.

Roemer - Louisiana? I agree, nobody is paying attention to this guy. Is his record even conservative? I haven't checked to be honest.

Romney - I thought he would be our nominee in 2008, given his picture-perfect family, smooth delivery, and near perfect super organized campaign machine. Instead he could barely hold off Huckabee. Old news, go away Romney.

Trump - Egomaniacal fraud trying to seduce us.

Santorum - Losing re-election to a nobody by an 18-point margin in 2006 killed his presidential chances. Should be trying to make a comeback by starting small instead of trying to get the other 49 states to like him. Non-starter. Another guy in the “people I USED to really like’ category, I thought he would have made a good veep candidate in 2000, before his career fell apart.

132 posted on 04/28/2011 12:55:15 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; campaignPete R-CT

Roemer’s House record looks okay, for a rat.

I don’t know what his record was as Governor , (wikipedia says he vetoed a pro-life bill) but he couldn’t out poll Edwin Edwards and David Duke, epic fail on that front.

Bozo the Clown should have been able to top those chumps. That’s probably worse than Santorum getting blasted by Casey.

And he’s not taking any big money donations (big time campaign finance reform guy). Meaning he has no chance of increasing his tiny name recognition.

133 posted on 04/28/2011 1:05:47 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

It sure seems to me that this is being set up for Daniels to be the nominee. Hard core conservatives are understandably wary of his reluctance to prioritize social issues.

I’ve seen and heard and read a lot from Daniels, and he is a true conservative, and he will ultimately appeal. He has really only said that we must first put our financial house in order before advancing social issues. Realistically, he’s right, and assuming that the GOP has a mandate after 2012, this strategy will leave plenty of time for social issues to come to the fore, and with growing popular support.

Barbour left to give Daniels a clearer shot. And if you do a Daniels-to-other comparison against any of the other GOP candidates, it seems to me that Daniels wins.

My belief is that this sorts out pretty quickly over the next 2-3 months, and that it’s Daniels v. Romney for frontrunner status, with the others a good distance behind.

134 posted on 04/28/2011 4:48:12 AM PDT by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

I wonder if Huck will endorse Sarah Palin when she does run??

I say he does not, but hope to be wrong.

I still believe Huck IS running. For me it`s Sarah Palin or bust!

135 posted on 04/28/2011 4:58:18 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012, PLEASE LORD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drellberg
It sure seems to me that this is being set up for Daniels to be the nominee. Hard core conservatives are understandably wary of his reluctance to prioritize social issues.

I am thinking the same thing. Daniels won re-election in 2008 in Indiana where Obama and everything else Democrat won, the party insiders know this.

As to hard core conservatives concerns, Daniels is going to have a bill on his desk this week to defund Planned Parenthood in Indiana, along with Charter School, School Voucher bill and a projected budget surplus. May be the most conservative legislative agenda success in the country.

136 posted on 04/28/2011 5:05:12 AM PDT by IamConservative (Political power; the most evil thing devised by man. It corrupts morals and judgment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
i don't recall the media forcing Bush 2 on us... i felt like they were forcing McCain back then... remember how they just loved his "Straight Talk Express?"

I agree with you there. I don't think GWB was too many people's first choice, at least not around here, but he was a solid second-choice for most and wound up gaining considerable conservative support as a consensus candidate rather than an ideal one.

On the whole, if we're going to analyze the field, as large as it is, I think it's important to note who people's second choice is -- that may tell us a lot more about who will eventually come through than what people's first choices tell us.

137 posted on 04/28/2011 5:17:07 AM PDT by kevkrom ("Winning The Future" = WTF = What The F*** / "Kinetic Military Action" = KMA = Kiss My A**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Impy

You don’t like him, but I think it’s Donny or bust.

Donny/Michele in 2012.

138 posted on 04/28/2011 5:44:07 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Some men DO just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
"They are stepping aside for Rove to trot out Jeb Bush. Romney gets to be VP. It will be RINO vs. Rat again. What a system."

Nope, mark my words you will see Rove give the nod to Mitch Daniels when he announces. They are quasi friends plus Mitch will also have the backing of many of the old Bush people who knew him when he worked there, especially Barbara.

About a year ago my mother asked Mitch what he thought of Sarah Palin in an informal meet and greet we attended. His response was sincere and I thought quite genuine, he really liked her a lot and his eyes lit up when she was mentioned. Even though I know a lot of people don't like him here my bet on the nominee will be a Daniels and (Palin or Bachmann) ticket.

139 posted on 04/28/2011 5:56:55 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Then you must be thinking Mitt (no!) or TPaw (I could stomach that). Christie would be great, if not for the fact that he isn’t running (and if he was, he’s awfully skinny of foreign policy).

140 posted on 04/28/2011 6:09:31 AM PDT by pghoilman (Earth First. We'll drill the rest of the galaxy later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson