Skip to comments.Rothschild Money has Directly & Chiefly Funded & Promoted George Soros
Posted on 04/30/2011 10:17:36 AM PDT by unspun
Searchlights on this now, so it doesn't just slip by unattended
April 29, 20011 @ 8:48am CT
Please pardon me for being so ignorant.
I knew that one Ed R. (Edmund Leopold de Rothschild) was a primary backer of the man-made global Marxofascism of Maurice Strong. What I did not know was that it was another Eddie R's loot, whatever set of objectives were coupled with it, which fed George Soros' rise to power. Ignorant, that is, till a flitting tweet presented Arnaud de Borchgrave's April 28th article, "Geneva Gnome's Global Dread."
And this is how his editor's report in the Washington Times begins.
The Gnomes of Zurich were derogatory caricatures of secretive, greedy, stiff Swiss-German bankers, pince-nez aquiver, who ruled over the land of secret numbered accounts for tax dodgers the world over. With the worlds best financial intelligence service, they knew their stuff and seldom spoke, even in retirement.Aside from Mr. Karlweis and his moralizing with New World Orderling of the pseudoconservative kind, de Borchgrave, should these Rothschild relationships not bear our interest?
Their Geneva counterparts in French-speaking Switzerland were more sophisticated, relaxed in the company of global wheeler-dealers, and werent afraid to speak their minds, albeit off the record. Such was George C. Karlweis, the brain behind Banque Privee, owned by the late Baron Edmond de Rothschild. His biggest claim to fame: George Soros and the launch of his Quantum Fund in 1969.
An original $100,000 stake in Mr. Soros fund was worth $150 million by 1994. Between 1970 and 2000, the return was 3,365 percent. (For 10 consecutive years, it did 42.6 percent per year.) In 1992, Mr. Soros bet billions against the British pound - and broke the Bank of England (Black Wednesday).
So the man behind Mr. Soros original success is worth listening to today - unafraid to speak his mind in retirement.
Strong's E.R. lived from 1916 to 2009. Soros' spanned 1929-1997. Maybe Gyorgi was harder on his. Now there are articles on the 'net of varying veracity, about the Soros-Rothschild relationship, but should this rock hard fact not be common knowledge?
If you happen to be one to tolerate net-radio archives, you may want to know that last Gulag Night, AJ of Noisy Room, Tallulah Starr, CJ in TX, and I talked us up some central banker. And along with a caller named Phil, we discussed the hypothesis (one wouldn't want to call it a conspiracy theory) that bye and large, the history of the global socialist/communist movement and the saga of the currency debauching central banking complex are the history of the same. No wonder they get together and plan for global collectivism, especially this Bankster Spring.
That is not to say that every single person involved with the corruptions of central banking must intentionally be fomenting Marxism; no more than to say every Marxist is excited about finance. But there is mounting evidence of close associations over not only decades but centuries, associations not only of people but of their intentions and one thing is certain.
Now, there is more for us to discuss, no matter how tender one must be toward the ethnic sensitivities involved.
More to write, too, but for me, after more reading -- and a second apology if you are familiar with all this, already.
Rothschilds have been on the right side and wrong side at times for centuries now.
Guess we can tell this century’s bunch are the less bright ones.
Rarely used FR Ping List for GulagBound.com and Gulag Media
Feel free to FReepmail, if you want on or off this list.
As consistent manipulators of politics and both skimmers and debauchers of currencies, they have alwyas been on one wrong side or another. Wherever central banksterism goes, it is wrong.
As they fed communism, they continue to feed globalist collectivism, generating the power of the enemy of free and Sovereign America that dwarfs Al Queda.
[Always wondered about that connection.]
Inbreeding over generations has produced the Rothschilds of today.
It is nice to get a glimpse behind the lib scene. We, the great unwashed, need to hear more about this. But please translate into facts and language that we will want to read.
Railing against Rothchilds is normally associate with anti-semitism.
it’s generally an opening round.
I’ll leave it at that.
“Railing against Rothchilds is normally associate with anti-semitism.”
Not necessarily so, Jews have been bankers through the ages. For good or ill it has nothing to do with their being Jewish.
Does it change whether or not the Rothchilds are backing Soros? Claiming racism or anti-semitism is a means of intimidation by the control freak, power grabbing, greedy leftists to shut up.
I’m pretty sure Rothschilds have been mostly Christian for several generations.
I’ve long been saying that Soros is just the visible member of a much bigger group. Much like Osama was just the visible front man for a bunch of wealthy Arab money men, acting as the visible liaison between them and the operational people.
I wonder if George Whore’os had anything to do with the destruction and pillaging of Argentina in the 70s & 80s. Talking about destroying the working class, and the economy for generations. Euro Big Banks got most of the loot, as well as the Big Euro companies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH6_i8zuffs -hard and pain full to watch, but worth it.
Thanks what I was thinking. LOL