Flesh man cannot replicate miracles, but some of them sure like to claim they are in charge of declaring what is or is not a miracle.
When the so called scientific methodology claims that alll life evolved from one singular cell when that cell got all hot and bothered in its hot steaming pot of pond scum eons ago are null and void of the 'soul', which is place at conception in the flesh vessel to take this short journey. Now Adam as was first formed from the dust got the first operation and a curve was removed from his body to form woman. What does that tell anyone the original condition of flesh man? He is only half here.
So if we know of natural means whereby I could be created “from dust” - does that mean that God is not my creator? No, of course it doesn't.
If we know of natural means whereby Stars form - does that mean that God did not create them? No, of course it doesn't.
And if someone comes up with a SCIENTIFIC (thus no miracles) explanation for how life could have plausibly formed via natural means - does that mean that God did not create life? No, of course it doesn't.
Newton was sure to stress that by utilizing natural means to explain the movement of celestial bodies - he was in NO WAY suggesting that God was not ultimately responsible.
Apparently over a hundred years later some people are still under the mistaken impression that unless God pulled out a miracle then HE cannot be said to be the Creator or otherwise responsible party. Ludicrous.