Skip to comments.The Atlantic: The Tragedy of Sarah Palin
Posted on 05/16/2011 6:40:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
From the moment Sarah Palins acceptance speech electrified the Republican convention, she was seen as an unbending, hard-charging, red-meat ideologueto which soon was added thin-skinned and vindictive. But a look at what Palin did while in office in Alaskathe only record she hasshows a very different politician: one who worked with Democrats to tame Big Oil and solve the great problem at the heart of the states politics. That Sarah Palin might have set the nation on a different course. What went wrong?
Its hard to escape Sarah Palin. On Facebook and Twitter, cable news and reality television, she is a constant object of dispute, the target or instigator of some distressingly large proportion of the political discourse. If she runs for presidentwell, brace yourself! But there is one place where a kind of collective resolve has been able to push her aside, make her a less suffocating presence than almost everywhere else: Alaska.
During a week spent traveling there recently, I learned that Palin occupies a place in the minds of most Alaskans roughly like that of an ex-spouse from a stormy marriage: shes a distant bad memory, and questions about her seem vaguely unwelcome. Visitors to Juneau, the capital and a haven for cruise-ship tourism, are hard-pressed to find signs of the states most famous citizenno Mama Grizzly memorabilia or T-shirts bearing her spunky slogans. Although the town was buzzing with politics because the legislature was in session, talk of Palin mainly revolved around a rumored Democratic poll showing her to be less popular in Alaska right now than Barack Obama. The only tangible evidence I saw was her official portrait in the capitol and a small sign in the window of a seedy-looking gift shop advertising Sarah Palin toilet paper. Alaska has moved on.
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
The Atlantic? “Nuff said.
They knew it the first time they saw her.
It's why they go insane ever time they think of her.
Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN unlike Comrade Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama.
> she was seen as an unbending, hard-charging, red-meat
> ideologueto which soon was added thin-skinned
> and vindictive.
This description applies better to the Communist ideologue, narcissist, Metrosexual-in-Chief 0bamao than it does to Sarah Palin.
For him, however, I would replace “red-meat” with “red-soviet”.
I’d like to hear from people in Alaska if Sarah really is a distant bad memory. If so, I don’t get it. She had astronomically high ratings there. Maybe Alaskans aren’t as independent minded as they like to think if the steady stream of MSM anti-Sarah poison has changed their POV.
Is it just me, or is The Atlantic more obsessed with Palin than any other lame stream media outlet?
You see, this is how the left judges...you have to be a pop-star for them to like you. Name one other politician that has T-shirts with their likeness or message being sold now--other than that media/Soros/ creation, Husseim obama.
If Sarah did have a T-shirt, it should read "It's the Communism Stupid."
At the order of the DemocRAT party the media destroyed Sarah Palin through vicious unwarranted attacks on her and her family, virtually from the first moment she was announced as McCain’s running mate. Now they have the nerve to ask what happened to her.
“...unbending, hard-charging, red-meat ideologueto which soon was added thin-skinned and vindictive.
Only by the propagandizing, bitchy Commie queers who lie for The Atlantic.
“Palin also committed more-serious ethical breaches. The most notorious of these involved her attempts to get her former brother-in-law, a state trooper, fired, “
-The trooper who had threatened to kill the governors father.
“and included Palins removal of the troopers boss when he didnt comply with her wish.”
The trooper who had broken his own wife’s arm in a domestic dispute.
All of a sudden, there’s more media trashing Sarah. They are are trying to destroy her chances of running. And she’s been very quiet lately. There’s a chance she won’t run, but I think she will. When she declares, the whole thing is going to erupt. There are a bunch of folks waiting patiently. At least some of us are.
Whether your a Palin fan or not - it’s gonna get ugly and be a whole lot of fun.
RE: All of a sudden, theres more media trashing Sarah
Yep, and she has not even announced her intention of running, much less formed an exploratory committee like Michele Bachmann.
Let’s face it, the left IS afraid that she will run. She is the candidate they fear most.
That’s why there is so much effort promoting the likes of Mitt Romney...
If I’m not mistaken Gov. Palin has already stated she doesn’t need a exploratory committee. When Sarah goes it full throttle campaign mode.
-- William Shakespeare
"Don't forget the Obama-Rumpswabbing Media"
-- Fed up, disgusted Americans
This is the time for Sarah to step up to the plate! America needs her more than ever. Yes, the leftwing press will attempt to asassinate her daily. If she loses, then this nation (formerly under God) will get the just results of 4 more years of the pretender Obama. At this point it’s not about Sarah, It’s about the republic and we the people need to stand up and give this greatest gift of God one more chance to survive. May God be with you Sarah, America, and the State of Israel!
It started out as a good morning until I read this article from that $h!the@d. At least post a location where we can tell him a few kind words.
Like I said - ugly and a whole lot of of fun. RUN SARAH RUN!
Daniels is the only other candidate taking flack right now.
I wonder why Pawlenty's escaped.
“If Im not mistaken Gov. Palin has already stated she doesnt need a exploratory committee.”
I saw that interview on Fox I think....Why the committee?.....Attendance to events that she headlines pretty much sums up the support if she declares....Ironic isn’t it?....The ones exploring are the ones with very little support.....
I think she WILL announce, but will do when SHE is ready. Thus far, that approach looks pretty darned good. Huckabee has already dropped out, and Newt has self-destructed in less than a week after announcing. At that rate, she will be "last woman standing" without expending any needed resources.
While trying to portray Palin as an egotistical, power-mad, scheming political operative, (Green quotes Dem foes of Palin...would they lie?) Green admits Palin left the state in much better shape when she left then before she became governor. Green wails that Palin switched from being someone who would cooperate with the other side and tranformed into an EVIL CONSERVATIVE!!! (gasp, brrr, shudder) with a conservative agenda. In short, Palin has principles with which she will not compromise. This is something libs cannot hack. They know she’s not afraid to advance those conservative principles. Undoubtedly, as president, like Reagan, Palin would make compromises. But her overall goal would be to advance conservative principles. This is why they hate her so much.
Objective journalism at it's best! /s
Pawlenty who? /sarc
Only someone without a sense of irony could call her vindictive after what the democrats did to her just because she dared to run for vice president.
So Alaska has moved on? I guess this is unlike Joshua Green and hundreds of other tabloid reporters that continue to write about her.
I myself will not knowingly again vote for another RINO. After he picked Sarrah for his running mate I voted for John Mc Cain. The I made a promise to myself that I would never vote again for the lesser of two evils. If that means two terms of obama, so be it.
That sounds suspiciously politically incorrect.
That should tell you something.
Yep, we should give up, just take the candidates they assign us, shut up and sit down. That's the ticket......
Yep, one wonders what universe the Marxbots live in.
I’m not sure Palin will run. But it is hillarious watching both the GOP and demrats pretend she’s invisible. I think, whether she runs or not, she is doing a great job being the the only so-called conservative candidate challenging Onada on the seminal issues. At the same time she is allowing the Pubbie pres. cand. field to sort out. Huckabee dropping out is great news. I’m optimistic the Gingrich campaign will flounder on the rocks fairly early on.
I’m hoping Cain and West gain traction. And I like Michelle Bachmann. These three, like Pallin, are taking the fight to the demrats. Sadly we will not see Romney and Paul disappear anytime soon. Money and zealotry, respectively, will keep them around even though their freshness date has long since expired.
My wife doesn’t think Palin, because she’s female, can win—even though she personally likes her. But if one believes that than one must believe that neither Cain or West could win the presidency because they’re black. I need only point to Onada to make my point. Voters might be reluctant to see another black man in the WH after the Onada disaster.
As for myself, I’m hopeful a majority of voters will select the best person for the office based the candidate’s stated and demonstrated beliefs—not the other guy’s record or saying one thing to one group while saying sonething else to another group.
the media is saving him until later. romney is the medias pick for republican nominee.
“That sounds suspiciously politically incorrect.”
The adverb is disappointing. LOL.
I need to work harder at being more blunt and direct when characterizing those who are destroying our nation.
Finally got to the point. If she had only acted more like a leftist the "media" would have portrayed her more favorably. After all, look how well it worked out for President Bush.
There needs to be a fresh new candidate like Cain who is not an easy MSM target. Like it or not, that is the reality of 2011 American Politics.
I rarely watch reality TV, but when Sarah had that phoney baloney good time whining Kate Goselin freezing in the Alaskan rain, I knew she was the next Margaret Thatcher and worthy to be my President. Meanwhile Goselins blessed (but abused) little kids were crawling all over her dad to learn about fish and bugs, and stuff. Todd was on the other side of the island minding his own business. This woman has it and I mean to support her anyway that I can. This is from someone the libs would call sexist, etc.
Anyone who has an (R) behind their name and is causing damage will be tarred the same way.
If you think Cain is the only one immune to this, I think you ought to look at how the MSM has treated other black candidates with an (R) behind their name.
Your logic fails here, and you should stop repeating this misinformation, because it's flat out wrong.
If she runs, she'll have the opportunity to change minds. If she runs she'll have a full throated campaign. If she runs, she may be the one candidate who can run her campaign directly at the MSM, rather than kow tow to the meme that conservatives have to sit down and shut up.
Your desire that we modify our message is so entirely wrong at this juncture in history.
We need bold candidates who draw bold differences in truth, not mushy, mealy mouthed moderates who simply echo the Marxist agenda while the country dies.
There is no such thing as a Republican candidate that won’t be an easy MSM target. No matter how broad their appeal was before announcing the media will attack relentlessly and unapologetically until said Republican is considered extreme.
Still angling to be Huck’s replacement, I see. And still the same old and dead arguments, too.
This story is like a murdering rapist who writes a glowing obituary about the senseless and tragic death of the wonderful and accomplished woman who was his victim.
Baloney!! You are either part of the problem or have been hoodwinked by those who are. The political consultants are always parroting the same line as you and they always help elect a Democrat.
Why do Democrats modify their approach and move to the right during election time? They do it to seem less threatening to the "moderates" than they really are. When we modify our position and move toward the left we simply water down our message and it ends up tweedle dee vs tweedle dum and with the media, the unions, Wall Street, voter fraud and the stupid on their side they always win.
This country is mostly conservative, not progressive. When we field a candidate that is a true conservative and who sticks to the conservative message, we win. The last time was Ronald Reagan. Bush 1 simply rode on Reagan's coattails and Bush 2 was better than Gore but even at that he barely won. Neither Bush had a strong conservative message. How did we take over the House and improve our position in the Senate? Conservatives who ran as conservatives won.
Palin is our best chance and the fact that the media has been after her since her first speech at the Republican convention should be proof enough that she is who the Democrats are most afraid of. That McCain's political consultants tried to shut her up so as to not detract from McCain's moderate image is further proof.
Cain would be fine with me as would Allen West. We actually have a number of fine candidates as long as none of them follow your advice.
The atlantic should change its’ name to the mud puddle. Nobody reads it anymore.