Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

It is conceptually easy to contemplate mass evacuation of 70,000 people but a big decision politically. This problem was sort of in the middle of “have to address now” and “let’s kick the can down the road”. The Japanese were looking for more consensus, as usual.

It’s a big job doing a real radiological survey over such an area. My own point of view is that where you have several million becquerels per square meter of caesium 134 and 137 you should evacuate everyone under 30 or 40 years of age until you can fence off areas contaminated at about 200,000 becquerels per square meter or more. 20 millisieverts per year won’t hurt anyone who knows what they are doing. For instance, don’t eat the dirt. Wear a dust mask. Keep your skin clean. Don’t eat food grown in the area. It is OK to feed animals contaminated food and eat them but don’t eat anything but muscle and maybe fat. This should be fine but should be monitored as needed.


23 posted on 05/24/2011 9:58:32 PM PDT by Iris7 ("Do not live lies!" ...Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Iris7

There was an April survey of dust samples at Fukushima province elementary schools.
http://eq.wide.ad.jp/files_en/110412school2_en.pdf

Results are in Becq/m3.

Most readings are ‘not detected’ or 3000 or so.
There are a 10,000 and 16,000. It seems to me even those could be remedied by, carefully, running a garden tiller over the land.


24 posted on 05/25/2011 6:52:52 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson