Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Exclusive: Medicaid for the middle class?
AP ^

Posted on 06/21/2011 3:28:55 PM PDT by SPI-Man

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: SPI-Man

“We’ll have to pass it to find out what’s in it.” /dumb


41 posted on 06/22/2011 7:10:20 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man

This is republican’s opportunity to kill the bill. They should amend this as the democrats want to, but at the same time amend the whole thing to be completely voluntary and non-binding and non-enforceable. Oh hell, just repeal it.


42 posted on 06/22/2011 7:13:23 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man
a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.

"We have to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it." - Nancy Pelosi, March 9, 2010

This was their justification for ramming this thing through without a thorough debate or analysis. Look what haste hath wrought.

43 posted on 06/22/2011 7:29:27 AM PDT by RWK (this message brought to you by the letter "T" [the party that's redefining politics])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man
President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.

We had to pass the bill to find out what's in it.

44 posted on 06/22/2011 7:30:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sono

“...more with insurance but without access to care.” That appears to be the agenda. Good old Van Jones—inside out.


45 posted on 06/22/2011 7:55:54 AM PDT by Silentgypsy (You know if I donÂ’t remember IÂ’m gonna forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man

This bill was always about creating Government dependency.
Why is this ‘gotcha’ a surprise?

The real surpise is this: How many state budgets will this ‘mistake’ bankrupt? All 50?


46 posted on 06/22/2011 1:10:21 PM PDT by WOSG (Herman Cain for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man

As if state budgets aren’t stressed enough without adding millions more medicaid patients! I wish the GOP would do more to stop Obamacare. I feel like they are taking their eyes off the prize!


47 posted on 06/22/2011 2:13:03 PM PDT by libertarian neocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

>What doubly sucks is the first person that even suggests that this madness should be undone will be thoroughly demonized for “trying to roll back and cut Medicare”.

Which should be why EVERYONE that is able should hop on this baby... let’s bring the monster down.


48 posted on 06/22/2011 7:45:18 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CodeSlinger1

“Can’t do it. This just piles the debt onto our children’s backs. At the rate we are going, the next generation of Americans might become 3rd world serfs. :(”

And if you don’t do it you will get piles of debt onto our children anyway. At least if you do do it then the politicians in Washington will see that wall more as a tilde wave then the drastically less threatening slow steady rise of water that is more the next guy’s problem.
As a result they will be more inclined to act to protect themselves and ultimately us from this irresponsible program.

You see that there is the largest part of our problem with Washington’s spending and debt, the politicians now in office enjoying the fruits of their spending are not exposed to the costs of them spending cause it is indeed too long term.

By adding your weight to the pile you either diminish the value of fruits( dividing a finite sum up more) or you increase the rate of the problem thus making the problem far more immediate.

Either way as counter-intuitive as it may sound taking as much money as you can from the system is the best way to help destroy and/or reform it.


49 posted on 06/22/2011 10:10:40 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SPI-Man

Here is a new twist you can look for. Just like many couples (retirement age) don’t marry or even divorce in some cases to increase their Social Secuirty, You can expect the same here so that when separate returns are filed bringing them below the $64K threshold each and single they will now qualify for Medicaid with a $120,000 plus income. You have to pass it to see what is in it and I’m telling you this will be the next foot to fall and that 3 million number will go to 6 million


50 posted on 06/23/2011 9:11:26 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Your Medicaid doctor will be from Bangladesh and might speak 100 words of English


51 posted on 06/23/2011 10:14:43 AM PDT by stan_sipple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson