Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
The journal editors and peer reviewers who are supposed to be guardians of the process have NOT done so. They have participated in pushing only one side of the story.

Quite correct. But "the scientific method" does not fail because the guardians misbehave. You think this has never happened before?

Exposing the misbehavior of the guardians is itself part of the process of the scientific method.

30 posted on 07/16/2011 7:53:42 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
" But "the scientific method" does not fail because the guardians misbehave. You think this has never happened before?"

Of course it has, but in past incidents, the exposure was done by other scientists within the scientific community, and not via "trial by newspaper/website/blog".

"Exposing the misbehavior of the guardians is itself part of the process of the scientific method."

Indeed, but the process has been so corrupted these days that going outside the normal channels of scientific discourse has been necessary. I don't recall any case where that course has ever been necessary before.

Of course, I'm glad that the "backup channel" was/is available, otherwise they might well have "gotten away with it".

36 posted on 07/16/2011 11:14:53 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson