Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chesley

So the man is denied rights because of his act of copulation before marriage and can be continuously denied these rights by a woman because of her act of copulation before marriage.

Child’s best interest be damned I guess.


24 posted on 07/19/2011 6:40:30 AM PDT by dpa5923 (Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: dpa5923

What is the child’s best interest? It seems to me that that is the question.

Suppose the man is a total, abusive jerk? Should the mother have to go to court like if she was married? I don’t think so.

I just think, in this case, that it is pretty clear which systems have worked, both for the best interests of the child, and of society.

Yeah. Keep in in your pants, or in a rubber till marriage, and these problems will cease to exist for you.


25 posted on 07/19/2011 7:40:14 AM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: dpa5923

By the way, did you read the article?

As I understood it, the mother would be allowed to reject the father’s voluntary acceptance of paternity so that somebody else could have those rights.

Now THAT is pretty bad.


26 posted on 07/19/2011 7:45:44 AM PDT by chesley (Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson