Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner tries to tame GOP on debt ceiling plan
Politico ^

Posted on 07/27/2011 8:12:01 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-106 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2011 8:12:01 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.”

Spoken like O and Larry Sinclair.


2 posted on 07/27/2011 8:15:33 AM PDT by library user (Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

...they’re not behind him because it does nothing...so GET YOUR ASS BUSY BONEHEAD


3 posted on 07/27/2011 8:16:31 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He’s a clown. He has no intention of ever making significant cuts.

Worse is that he’s already got some tea party freshman, like Alan West, to sell out his base.


4 posted on 07/27/2011 8:16:35 AM PDT by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Boehner said yesterday that it is a "moral imperative" to avoid "default" and to protect baby-boomer entitlements...in other words it is a "moral imperative" to continue the growth in government spending and borrowing. He said that on Rush, of all places.

If that is a moral imperative, but limiting the power of government to economically enslave us to politician's programs (and graft and corruption) is not a "moral imperative" then who, really, is going to "fold like a cheap suit" when the chips are really down?

5 posted on 07/27/2011 8:16:54 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Bonehead just doesn't get it. The cuts should have been at least 5 or 6 trillion over 10 years with 1.2 cut the first year. What the hell is this dumb ass doing? Sure it might not pass the Senate or our dictator King Obama but at least over have of the population will be with him and they will blame the RATS for the crash.
6 posted on 07/27/2011 8:17:21 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No, Boehner.. you couldn’t even come up with $1T in cuts over a DECADE!!??

Oh, hell no!!

Get YOUR ASS back to the desk and work the numbers again!!


7 posted on 07/27/2011 8:17:58 AM PDT by ScottinVA (As a party that gives Obama what he wants, what again is the GOP`s 2012 selling point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teg_76

The problem is that nothing serious about the debt can be done with Reid-Obama and the Democratic clowns infesting the Senate and Presidency. Until then, pretty much everything is around the edges.


8 posted on 07/27/2011 8:18:08 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

Agreed....


9 posted on 07/27/2011 8:19:34 AM PDT by tatown (Obama is a turd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Get Your Ass In Line!"


10 posted on 07/27/2011 8:19:43 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

"Get Your Ass In Line!"


11 posted on 07/27/2011 8:19:50 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

OK, let me play politics for a minute.

If I were a Tea Party Freshman, here’s what I’d tell Boehner...

“Mr. Speaker...you already understand why I oppose this bill; you yourself of course are a fan of Cut, Cap and Balance, and I don’t know why you aren’t pushing forward wtih CCB instead of this. Perhaps you know it won’t pass, so can we do this instead - we’ll pass this, but we reintroduce CCB (without the debt ceiling increase since that’s already done) once this is passed and signed.”


12 posted on 07/27/2011 8:20:12 AM PDT by RockinRight (If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.”

Where's that pre-election promised $100 billion in spending cuts? Oh yeah, that can got kicked down the road.

Mr. Boehner, your credibility is on shakey ground. Your offer allows cuts to be kicked down the road, but spending to happen almost immediately.

Maybe, you are right -- maybe you can't do this job.
13 posted on 07/27/2011 8:21:57 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Boehner also predicted Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and Senate Democrats will have to pass his proposal once the House does.

The House passed CCB.... the Senate tabled it.

Why does Boehner think this time the Senate will even allow a vote?

14 posted on 07/27/2011 8:22:47 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown; mrs9x

I do it myself too, we all do, but we lose track of political reality sometimes.

If things go south (granted I don’t think it’ll be as bad as they say if we “default” since it isn’t a real default), the GOP could end up taking the blame for it, Obama gets re-elected, and none of this matters.

My idea is to re-introduce CCB every couple months (w/o the debt limit increase since it’ll be done) and keep pushing, but make it a seperate bill from this.

I challenge the hard-nosers on FR to become a Congressman and get ANY bill passed that we conservatives are 100% happy with...

We can’t even convince EACH OTHER on FR who the best Presidential candidate is, can you imagine trying to get 220 Congressman and 51 Senators, and a President on top of that to all support a bill?


15 posted on 07/27/2011 8:23:25 AM PDT by RockinRight (If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Rush really PMO when he allowed Boner to present his side without the logical retort. I don’t want or need to listen to a radio program that trumpets the Republican line. I want real change, and that means a balanced budget, NOT a “balanced approach.”


16 posted on 07/27/2011 8:24:22 AM PDT by runninglips (Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Thats what I have been thinking for a while.

Trouble is, there will be a problem with bringing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the senate with all the dims still in it. I think realistically we have to take the White House and the Senate before we are gonna get that. We don't have the leverage yet. As much as I hate to admit that.

17 posted on 07/27/2011 8:25:25 AM PDT by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I know this won’t be popular here, but isn’t this what Obama fears? The GOP controls 1/4 of the government at the moment, (counting just the executive and legislative branches).

Assume Boehner’s plan passes.

- The GOP looks more reasonable, in bending to avoid default.

- Obama will have to go through this one more time before the 2012 election.

Both things could lead to enough gains that real reform could be possible.

Sometimes pragmatism isn’t all bad.


18 posted on 07/27/2011 8:25:35 AM PDT by brownsfan (I miss the America I grew up in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Get YOUR ass home, and find a new job.


19 posted on 07/27/2011 8:25:59 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Blaming the Republican Congress is the plan for 2012. The Dims showed their hand by not passing a budget since forever. The Dims will position themselves as the responsible party, and the Pubes as free spenders, with hatred for the po folk.


20 posted on 07/27/2011 8:26:30 AM PDT by runninglips (Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.”

Speaker Boehner, Leadership 101 suggests that the quickest way to get people behind you is merely to step to the front.

21 posted on 07/27/2011 8:26:46 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ever notice how good Republicans are at talking tough to fellow Republicans? Talking tough to Dems...not so much.

Dems talk tough to Republicans too. They rarely, if ever, do the same to fellow Dems.


22 posted on 07/27/2011 8:27:08 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

I think the BBA was the part that made CCB DOA, as sad as that is.

I’d have simply re-introduced CCB w/o the BBA, then introduce the BBA seperately after this blows over - it would have MORE public visibility that way and public opinion supports a BBA...


23 posted on 07/27/2011 8:27:29 AM PDT by RockinRight (If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The sellout. I thought so.


24 posted on 07/27/2011 8:29:05 AM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Boehner, stop negotiating against yourself

.

25 posted on 07/27/2011 8:29:13 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

That is true.

We ALL do it...want the full loaf now. Also, there are plenty of reasons NOT to be pragmatic, but you have to look at this the right way.

As I said earlier in the thread, I challenge ONE Freeper to become a Representative and get a bill passed! It’s harder than we think it is behind our keyboards.


26 posted on 07/27/2011 8:29:27 AM PDT by RockinRight (If we're "teabaggers" then they're "d-baggers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: library user
“I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.”

OK, then we will replace you with someone we CAN get behind!

27 posted on 07/27/2011 8:29:44 AM PDT by teletech (Say NO to RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: runninglips

Rush has gone soft. I’ve gravitated to Levin lately. He’s not worried about getting “important” people upset at him, like Rush and Hannity are.


28 posted on 07/27/2011 8:30:06 AM PDT by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
“I can’t do this job unless you’re behind me.”

We know, John. We don't want them behind you!.....................

29 posted on 07/27/2011 8:30:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (PEAS in our time? Obama cries PEAS! PEAS! when there is no PEAS!..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: runninglips

“Rush really PMO when he allowed Boner to present his side without the logical retort.”

Rush admitted several times that he should have challenged Boner

We don’t a cut one the growth of govt, we want a major cut now!


30 posted on 07/27/2011 8:32:18 AM PDT by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Assume Boehner’s plan passes.
- The GOP looks more reasonable, in bending to avoid default.
- Obama will have to go through this one more time before the 2012 election.
Both things could lead to enough gains that real reform could be possible.
Sometimes pragmatism isn’t all bad.

I agree. This is not the time to go for the whole enchilada. We have to get rid of Obama and the Dem majority in the Senate first. Like it or not, we cannot afford to lose a PR battle at this time and we cannot let the dems continue to ruin the economy. We have to take what we can get now and get the rest after 2012.

31 posted on 07/27/2011 8:33:59 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Boehner the Head Turd Polisher.


32 posted on 07/27/2011 8:34:48 AM PDT by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Two things that are CRUCIAL to remember as we discuss this among ourselves and with friends/colleagues:

1. THESE ARE NOT PROPOSED CUTS TO ANYTHING!! They are REDUCTIONS IN THE INCREASES!! This is still not fiscally responsible conduct.

2. Boehner is starting to flail, plea, and sputter like Nobama. It is also becoming more and more apparent that he does not share the important conservative views most Americans are demanding. Our freshmen need to be reminded that we expect them to stand firm to the pledges they made when we sent them to D.C., IN SPITE of what “Leader” Boehner is instructing them to do.

We will win this battle in the war.

33 posted on 07/27/2011 8:35:27 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Photobucket

"Leave the sad tangerine alone!
34 posted on 07/27/2011 8:35:46 AM PDT by ZX12R (FUBO GTFO 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Maybe, you are right — maybe you can’t do this job

He sure can’t.


35 posted on 07/27/2011 8:35:51 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

“The problem is that nothing serious about the debt can be done with Reid-Obama and the Democratic clowns infesting the Senate and Presidency. Until then, pretty much everything is around the edges.”

Unfortunate but true.


36 posted on 07/27/2011 8:36:13 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I totally agree - and removing the BBA could be the simple change made to re-pass it and resubmit to Senate.

IMO the CCB being omitted from the conversation is what lost us our control of the situation.


37 posted on 07/27/2011 8:36:35 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Just called my Congressman’s office to remind him that his “rear-end” was answerable to me, not to Boner.

The girl on the other end seemed surprised by this.


38 posted on 07/27/2011 8:37:10 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (I'll have what the gentleman on the floor is drinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

After listening to that conversation between Rush and Boehner yesterday, my head was spinning.


39 posted on 07/27/2011 8:37:15 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
This "pragmatic" theory fails to take into account the losses Republicans will suffer from conservatives for failing to support conservative principles (to "get along", of course).

I don't see that expanding the debt without real corresponding entitlement cuts is the path to victory in 2012.

40 posted on 07/27/2011 8:37:56 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
The only thing I despise and don't trust at all about this plan is the committee. If that committee has dims on it, and it will, they will without one iota of a doubt come out for tax increases in phase 2.

So whats the plan to prevent that? If theres nothing to prevent them from getting tax increases, they will, by gaia, get tax increases.

41 posted on 07/27/2011 8:39:46 AM PDT by libs_kma (When I see anyone with an Obama 2012 bumper sticker, I recognize them as a threat to the gene pool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Principled

Why does Boehner think this time the Senate will even allow a vote?

Because the fix has been in for some time. However, Bonehead screwed the pouch when his plan fell short of the “phantom” spending cuts, based on the CBO scores. He can’t even get his own sham of a plan right. Lesson to learn: If u r going to try to hoodwink Americans with a sham plan, at least get the numbers right.


42 posted on 07/27/2011 8:39:58 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“Cut, cap, and balance” has already passed the House, quite comfotably. Go home, Mr. Speaker, and dismiss the House. The ball is now in the Senate’s court. The Senate has not even brought CC&B up for debate or a vote yet. Mr. Speaker, your job is done until the Senate acts.

So, get your ass out of town.


43 posted on 07/27/2011 8:39:58 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
‘Get your ass in line’.... drop your pants and don't forget the lube!----- Boehner's message to conservatives and the tea party.
44 posted on 07/27/2011 8:42:46 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Trouble is, there will be a problem with bringing a Balanced Budget Amendment to the senate with all the dims still in it. I think realistically we have to take the White House and the Senate before we are gonna get that. We don't have the leverage yet. As much as I hate to admit that.

Besides being great policy, the BBA is a great campaign issue for the GOP. A huge majority of the electorate favors a BBA.

I advocate bringing the BBA up again sometime next fall in the midst of the silly season. Force everyone in Congress to take a stand on it and explain their stand to their constituents.

I doubt Reid would bring it to a vote in the Senate (it might actually pass the Senate, then Obama would be screwed) and when he doesn't, Democrats will be on the hot seat.

Let every person in Congress explain why Joe 6P has to balance his budget, but the federal government can just keep racking up debt.

45 posted on 07/27/2011 8:42:50 AM PDT by randita (All we are sayin' is give peas a chance...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: teg_76

I’ve gravitated to Levin lately

Me too. Levin has been hammering these hacks. He does not hold back. GO LEVIN!


46 posted on 07/27/2011 8:43:50 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
If nothing serious can get done, fine. That is no reason to compromise.

I'd keep sending CCB back to the senate and every time it is rejected without a vote, I'd cut off a few million more in spending and send it back again.

They could even change the name of CCB, call it CBE "cut and balance eventually", but still make no changes.

But there should certainly be no compromise on what is right, just keep sending it over and over again. That is what I'd do, anyway.

47 posted on 07/27/2011 8:44:33 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Boehner wants to seem reasonable, and the Leadership is TERRIFIED that the Obama-backing media will blame THEM, just like 1994.

Obama’s ONLY CONCERN is that he doesn’t want to revisit this issue before the 2012 elections, because he knows it’s a loser.

But his plan is more smoke and mirrors, without real change. Thank God the Tea Party is holding his feet to the fire now.

This is coming eventually, now is better than later.


48 posted on 07/27/2011 8:45:07 AM PDT by tcrlaf (PREFRONTAL LOBOTOMISTS FOR OBAMA2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Reid has an alternate plan to cut $2.7 trillion

I wonder.

Has the CBO scored Reid's plan?

49 posted on 07/27/2011 8:45:47 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

CCB had big public support and would have gone a long way to solving our problems. I don’t understand why the House gave up on it so fast Reid called it bad names and zero said he’d veto it and poof - something most of us liked was dead. You’d think public pressure - incited by the GOP - would have forced the Senate to vote on it and then they could have dared zero to veto it.


50 posted on 07/27/2011 8:46:14 AM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson