Skip to comments.
Gay couple asked to reverse shirt at Dollywood
Associated Press ^
| July 27, 2011
| Kristin M. Hall
Posted on 07/27/2011 6:44:22 PM PDT by feralcat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: CaspersGh0sts
OMG, your comment cracked me up. lololololol
21
posted on
07/27/2011 8:13:49 PM PDT
by
peggybac
To: GnuHere; Chode
"Nasty! I would just like her covered up cause shes gross!"
22
posted on
07/27/2011 8:20:37 PM PDT
by
Morgana
(I never said a thing.....................)
To: Morgana
>>”Nasty! I would just like her covered up cause shes gross!”<<
There is a difference between covering a tightly cropped (pointy) head and being hidden. One is a matter of tact, one is a matter of life and death.
I don’t want to see her man arms just like I don’t want to see Michelle Obama’s. That doesn’t mean I want either woman to wear a Niqab or Burqa. To compare that is silly.
23
posted on
07/27/2011 8:28:48 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Happiness is a choice)
To: netmilsmom
24
posted on
07/27/2011 8:46:48 PM PDT
by
Morgana
(I never said a thing.....................)
To: feralcat
25
posted on
07/27/2011 9:10:18 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution!)
To: isthisnickcool
That sure looks like a man on the right.
26
posted on
07/27/2011 9:12:07 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution!)
To: CaspersGh0sts
You have to try to look that ugly. Really.
not really, to some it comes naturally....
her hate, just "effervesces"...
*sorry...for the hurt eyes / "tossed" foodstuffs.*
27
posted on
07/27/2011 9:23:50 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(You do not have to smear (Pharaoh / Imam / DumboEars) Obama w/ lies....the truth does a fine job. :)
To: feralcat
It was an inappropriate shirt - has nothing to do with “inclusiveness.” They should not have been wearing that in a family oriented theme park in front of families and children. That’s the bottom line. The park has the right to ask for common decency on the part of its guests - with an emphasis on the fact they are guests. Unless they have evidence that anyone else would have been permitted to wear clothing with inappropriate phrases on it besides them, they have no case.
To: HiTech RedNeck
29
posted on
07/28/2011 12:18:57 AM PDT
by
hummingbird
(Help keep Guam from tilting...still not tilting...)
To: HiTech RedNeck
30
posted on
07/28/2011 12:19:15 AM PDT
by
hummingbird
(Help keep Guam from tilting...still not tilting...)
To: skinkinthegrass
I will have to sleep with the lights on, rocking back and forth and crying hysterically.
Who has the photo “That which is seen cannot be unseen?”
31
posted on
07/28/2011 12:22:48 AM PDT
by
hummingbird
(Help keep Guam from tilting...still not tilting...)
To: hummingbird
32
posted on
07/28/2011 10:11:04 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(You do not have to smear (Pharaoh / Imam / DumboEars) Obama w/ lies....the truth does a fine job. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson