Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The tea party's terrorist tactics
Politico ^

Posted on 07/29/2011 7:16:25 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

The tea party's terrorist tactics By: William Yeomans July 29, 2011 08:22 AM EDT

It has become commonplace to call the tea party faction in the House “hostage takers.” But they have now become full-blown terrorists.

They have joined the villains of American history who have been sufficiently craven to inflict massive harm on innocent victims to achieve their political goals. A strong America has always stood firm in the face of terrorism. That tradition is in jeopardy, as Congress and President Barack careen toward an uncertain outcome in the tea party- manufactured debt crisis.

As we stumble closer to Aug. 2, it has become clear that many in the tea party are willing to inflict massive harm on the American people to obtain their political objective of a severely shrunken federal government. Their persistence in rejecting compromise, even as the economic effects of the phony crisis they have created mount, has taken their radicalism beyond tough negotiating, beyond even hostage-taking.

As markets fall in anticipation that there may not be a timely resolution; as credit agencies issue dire warnings that the U.S. political system has become so dysfunctional that a credit downgrade may be inevitable, and as America looks weakened in the eyes of the world, the tea party’s hostage-taking has evolved into the intentional infliction of harm on innocent Americans to achieve a political objective – terrorism.

Terrorism is a tough term, but, unfortunately, it describes tea party tactics precisely. Their first step was to vow not to vote to raise the debt ceiling.

Here, as in many radical factions, there was a split between the purists and the pragmatists. Pragmatists vowed not to raise the ceiling unless draconian cuts were made in the federal government.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: captainhyperbole; daysofwhineandroses; debtceiling; morethorazineplease; teaparty; tedkennedy; williamyeomans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-97 last
To: Sub-Driver
Vive La Revolucion!!!!
51 posted on 07/29/2011 7:36:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Bart: [high-pitched voice] Oh, lo’dy, lo’d, he’s desp’it! Do what he sayyyy, do what he sayyyy!
[Townspeople drop their guns. Bart jams the gun into his neck and drags himself through the crowd towards the station]
Harriet Johnson: Isn’t anybody going to help that poor man?
Dr. Sam Johnson: Hush, Harriet! That’s a sure way to get him killed!
Bart: [high-pitched voice] Oooh! He’p me, he’p me! Somebody he’p me! He’p me! He’p me! He’p me!
Bart: [low voice] Shut up!
[Bart places his hand over his own mouth, then drags himself through the door into his office]
Bart: Ooh, baby, you are so talented!
[looks into the camera]
Bart: And they are so *dumb*!


52 posted on 07/29/2011 7:38:09 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

the flak is heaviest when you’re right over the target


53 posted on 07/29/2011 7:38:47 AM PDT by Jeff Vader (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

I agree.

The use of “terrorism,” “hostage-taking” and “bombs strapped to their bodies” (the latter I heard out of that filthy criminal union toady Steve Rattner this morning) is a disgrace and an offense to America.

The Left—like the vermin Rattner, not to mention congressional Democrats and the President himself—refuses to recognize actual terrorism in and out of the U.S.

Yet they are quick to throw that vile epithet at those who oppose them politically and morally. I would like to take each of them by the scruff and grind their noses in the Hallowed Earth of Ground Zero to remind them, if only for a few minutes, what terrorism is and what Amercans are supposed to be.

Our country is riven, divided between those of us who love what it was and can be and those—the Left—who despise its very nature.

The battle is coming.


54 posted on 07/29/2011 7:38:58 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

New definition of terrorism:

Not giving a whiny liberal everything he wants.


55 posted on 07/29/2011 7:38:58 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

agreed- lets see the GOP spine continue to grow and bring up both our points...


56 posted on 07/29/2011 7:40:13 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5million pay no federal income tax then vote demoKrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
William Yeomans, an American University law professor, served as Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee and as a Justice Department official.

Just a 'concerned' American here...nope, no partisanship here...nosiree.....

57 posted on 07/29/2011 7:40:21 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

OK... So while I’m a libertarian, and thus favor legalizing recreational narcotics, that doesn’t mean that I’m OK with writing while stoned.

...or editing while stoned.

...or publishing while stoned.


58 posted on 07/29/2011 7:40:27 AM PDT by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I'll be very honest here...amnd I'll probably get flamed for it.

I honestly do NOT feel the debt ceiling is the place for this disussion. I honestly feel they should just raise the debt ceiling apart from any budget ties.

This is a budget issue and it needs to be fought as such. They screwed up when they didn't stick to their guns on the 2011 budget. They should have base-lined the 2011 budget against 2008...and the American People would have supported them...but they went wobbly.

Another tactic would be to pass the democratic budget in 2011 (and pund it home that they should have done it)...raise the debt ceiling...and THEN baseline teh 2012 budget on 2008 lines.

But THIS approach? This is cutting off our nose to spite our face. The ENTIRE GOP looks weak. If they wanted CCB...they should ahve passed it...said this is it...and walked away...then took teh case to the American people.

If we try to go down this road...we will lose politically.

59 posted on 07/29/2011 7:40:29 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
William Yeomans, an American University law professor, served as Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee and as a Justice Department official.
60 posted on 07/29/2011 7:41:46 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
I disagree. It is the place for this discussion because the debt - and its legal ceiling are the direct result of unchecked spending far and above the revenue the government receives.....it is not a perfunctory formalization to pay debts we alreay owe; it is an admission that we are about to and will again commit to MORE DEBT! Refusing to raise the debt limit then forces the government to live within its means.

If that means that a few, or several agencies have to go out of existence, then so be it. If it means that some of the 40% of the people in this country who don't pay taxes have to, then so be it. If it forces a large portion of the people on EBT, EITC, AFDC, WICs, SCHIP and the hundreds of other supplements to go out and work, then so be it....

61 posted on 07/29/2011 7:46:47 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

This is very simple.

The left wants Total Submission. To have even one Republican take a stand is intolerable for them, much less a whole “group” of “upstarts”.

The psychology behind that is - frightening.


62 posted on 07/29/2011 7:47:37 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hysterical horseshit from the people who brought America to ruin. No comprise. Doing so will cheer the stock market but result in a greater disaster in a short time.
.


63 posted on 07/29/2011 7:48:28 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

There’s only one person, one side, sowing terror into Americans over this debt crisis. Let’s take one guess.


64 posted on 07/29/2011 7:51:42 AM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I am trying to understand the reasoning behind statements made by people like the one that wrote this column.

Although there are always fringe people who show up in any group, the Tea Party movement is about less taxes, or no increased taxes specifically and promoting a cultural shift toward a government that serves the people rather than people serving the government.

The controversy over the budget is an example of how skewed our arguments can become. But, there is obviously something far deeper here than basic party politics.

It is obvious to anyone who manages a household budget that we can't stay on the path congress has chosen for us over the years and the tea party caucus is holding fast to the contention that we must face reality. Many in congress and folks like the writer of this column seem to staunchly believe that we can just keep spending, writing hoot checks and getting new credit cards to pay off the old credit cards.

They are so fixed on the belief that there is no need for responsibility that they are willing to attack and slander anyone speaking of responsible fiscal management. - At least that's the way it looks to my simple mind.

So where I get stuck is trying to assess what the folks on the left , the writer of this column and the defenders of democrat thought like the MSM commentators envision for the long run. What are they working for as the America of the coming decade or beyond?

65 posted on 07/29/2011 7:59:18 AM PDT by Baynative (If the government was in charge of the desert , we'd soon have a shortage of sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

I hate to read the drivel of the Left, but I think it is wise to know your enemy.

This is the propaganda that they will push. I don’t watch TV much, but a few days ago there was some liberal nitwit spewing on Fox about raising taxes on the billionaires, corporate jets, yada, yada, yada. It sounded like just like some Marxist-Leninist during the Cold War.

The commies are here. They may not label themselves as such, but they are.


66 posted on 07/29/2011 8:02:38 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This isn’t an article.

It’s not even an opinion piece.

It’s a full-on cry for mental health help.


67 posted on 07/29/2011 8:03:36 AM PDT by Lazamataz (If you pet a tiny goose, you will feel a little down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

They are progressives fighting for the status quo. Amusing isn’t it?


68 posted on 07/29/2011 8:06:07 AM PDT by listenhillary (2007 deficit 160 Billion, 2008 - 458 billion, 2009 -1.4 Trillion, 2010 - 1.6 Trillion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: KittenClaws
The psychology behind that is - frightening.

Read
You Can Still Trust the Communists to be Communists

and you'll see that this "psychology" is fully a communist mindset.

69 posted on 07/29/2011 8:09:17 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

*Won't You Get In Line To Sponsor New Monthly Donors*


Sponsoring FReepers Contribute $10 For Each New Monthly Donor Up To Ten
Or Become A New Monthly Donor Or
Give What You Can
Click Here To Donate


New Sponsors May Freepmail TheOldLady For Instructions

70 posted on 07/29/2011 8:14:33 AM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Well...then we better be prepared to put on our big boy pants and face the consequences...and here they are:

1) The media and the dems will sucessfully spin the crash that will ensue...and it will happen. You cannot immediately take $100 Billion a month out of the system and not crash the economy. That's a lot of workers...etc. That's a lot of 401K.

2) You better be prepared for another 4 years. 3) You better be prepared for a democratically controlled house and senate.

You see...not everyone in this country is a Freeper. They don't 1) understand the issue...2) Understand teh need to suck it up now to avoid catastrophe later. All they will know is "this sucks and everything I hear is its the GOP's fault...especially THAT tea-parties"

You can disagree with that all you want...but that IS what will happen. If you think it will unfold any differently...I suggest you get out more...take a gander at who is actually inhabiting this little land of ours...and then take a look at who they actually voted for. Remember...these people that so many Freepers have faith in to do the right thing and understand the debate...and that what we are doing is right...are the same people that 1) Put Obama in office...2) Have 53 dem senators in the Senate...re-elected Harry Reid...and 3) Re-elected almost 200 house members who put their full support behind San Fran Nan.

And if you think this country of knuckle heads won't listen to the MSM and these dems spin a collapse (and it will be...don't kid yourself...we are almost there even WITH 100 billion a month) as OUR fault? Well...get out more and go meet some of these air heads.

71 posted on 07/29/2011 8:21:02 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Civility and all that...


72 posted on 07/29/2011 8:28:42 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
"They are progressives fighting for the status quo..."

That part, I get. I am trying to see the long term objective of the folks who think like the author. Are they simple large 'D' democrats or is there a more sinister motive in their ideology. I don't want to accept that so many people are working for the demise of our country. But, it seems that way to me.

73 posted on 07/29/2011 8:29:55 AM PDT by Baynative (If the government was in charge of the desert , we'd soon have a shortage of sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
William Yeomans joined the faculty of law in 2009. From 2006 until 2009, he served as Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s Chief Counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee. He has also been Legal Director of the Alliance for Justice and the first Director of Programs for the American Constitution Society, where he spearheaded the launch of its two publications: the Harvard Law and Policy Review and Advance. Prior to that, he spent 26 years at the Department of Justice where he litigated and supervised civil rights cases in the federal courts involving voting rights, school desegregation, employment discrimination, housing discrimination, hate crimes, police misconduct, abortion clinic violence, and human trafficking. He served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Chief of Staff, and acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights.

Impeccable liberal pedigree. Maybe he can spend a little time investigating the civil rights-abridging diktats at his own university.

74 posted on 07/29/2011 8:31:06 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: basil

Oh well, one man’s terrorist is another man’s patriot, I suppose...

Sound familiar?


75 posted on 07/29/2011 8:33:48 AM PDT by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
The Tea Party is as much a part of the political reality of this country as that crowd of anti-American, blood-sucking wastrels who put “O” into office.

It is time for the MSM AND the Liberals to face ‘reality’ the same way the American voters were forced to do when they were faced with this Socialist fifth column and formed the Tea Party.

American taxpayers are positively SKINNED and it is time for 'politicians' to face THAT reality!

76 posted on 07/29/2011 8:35:03 AM PDT by SMARTY (A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
These people live in a bazaar mirrored universe.

The words in this article describe to a “t” what Obama and the leftists are doing to this country.

Their brains are broken to such a degree, that they become pathological in their pronouncements.

I've mentioned before the corollary of Osama and Obama.

Osama tried to destroy the economy of the USA by his attack on the Twin Towers--the center of our financial system--and Obama and the democrats are doing the exact same thing.

So who is following the terrorist playbook?

Certainly not the Tea Party Movement.

The writer of this article should look in the mirror and recite this screed to himself. (With appropriate changes of subjects addressed)

77 posted on 07/29/2011 8:36:01 AM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All
There's a tiny inconvenient fact for the writer: "Cut, Cap & Balance" passed from the House with bi-partisan support least week.

For many, like head of the Tea Party caucus, Michele Bachmann, that was compromise because it raised the debt ceiling period. It was a deal she was not willing to vote for. It was a deal Reid and his party was unwilling to even put up for a vote.

I am gravely concerned the Tea Party movement is on an economic suicide mission today that will destroy the opportunity for winning in 2012 and guarantee a Democrat sweep.

Make no mistake: if the GOP is destroyed by this tantrum in the next few days, they will be out of power for a very, very long time and no viable "third-party" is going to take their place in 2012.

You will have accomplished what the Democrats have not been able to do in 157 years or longer.

We're FINISHED as anything but a single Democrat Party nation.

You are about to do to the nation what the state GOP did in California during the 1990s.

Stop making them so happy!


78 posted on 07/29/2011 8:36:13 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Mike Pence is voting FOR the Boehner bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
Some true. Perhaps not partitioned as you imagine.

1) You're assuming the $100Bn/month are "workers"...and no contributions to 401Ks,etc. I'm saying a lot are not 'workers'; they're scammers on assistance. What you'd loose is the spending they make on whatever the heck it is they buy with their money the government gives them. There is also a lot of other money spent that doesn't have a lot to do with economy - foreign aid in $$, for example. Add that to the host of mysterious disappearance of all that TARP money, QE 1 and 2 and the fraud.

2) That's your assumption for 4 more years - what do you think Obama's supporters will do if he's left impotent on the budget and they lose their checks? Take the time to vote? These people are too into instant gratification and Obama won't be able to give them that; their life-ease will evaporate. Hell no - they'll riot, and that's where they'll lose real America's sympathy, even to the point where the MSM will pull back.

As far as "getting out", you have no way to know one way or the other. I didn't see the announcement where they dubbed you Nostradamus' Heir, I guess I missed that. I see and read plenty, and I see the tons of people using EBT cards, cashing EITC checks, tendering WICs checks, et al - I know how they are and how they vote. I've worked elections as a clerk, and I've worked since age 14 to this day, served my country, and many like me who are fed up with this and won't listen to "all the reasons why we can't anymore".

Lastly, "big boy pants" .....real damned funny. I'd hazard to guess I'm a hell of a lot better prepared than you (except for cute retorts).

79 posted on 07/29/2011 8:42:37 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
"Cut, Cap & Balance" passed from the House with bi-partisan support least week.

Right. Raising the debt ceiling $2.4 TRILLION dollars.

80 posted on 07/29/2011 8:44:30 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (For decades they've kicked the can down the road. Sorry, but there's no more road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Jake
You know, if the Democrats really believed this, they would be voting for the Boehner plan. It could easily pass without TP votes.

Exactly what I was thinking. The Tea Party caucus is what, at most 60 members of the House, and a handful in the Senate? If the other 300+ members of the whacko left and squishy middle can't come to their own agreement, how is that the Tea Party's fault?? They're just looking for a scapegoat.

81 posted on 07/29/2011 8:50:25 AM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Always talking about Peelosi ain’t he.


82 posted on 07/29/2011 8:54:06 AM PDT by Waco (Nominate Palin or forget 2012 you lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This kind of article is why I am loading up on ammo. This kind of rhetoric is what is going to enable the semi-dictator to become a full fledge dictator. Just like Hitler never took over with the ammo box, but by the ballot box. And then slowly he made a scapegoat, then he made them the states enemies. I truly believe the only thing keeping liberals away from full fledge tyranny is the guns in our hands. Never give up,never give in and never submit.


83 posted on 07/29/2011 9:45:11 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Read my post. It says it all.


84 posted on 07/29/2011 9:46:24 AM PDT by crazydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, I’m sure the original tea party was looked on as radical in its time.

And, isn’t it just like Dems/liberals/progressives to spend...spend...spend...spend and hope that the revenue equals their spending (like accountants).

Then blame others when it does not.

Got news for them...IT’S NOT MY FAULT YOU OVER SPENT AND NOW DON’T HAVE THE MONEY. Take it out of the money you are sending to terrorist countries who hate us.


85 posted on 07/29/2011 9:50:09 AM PDT by beachn4fun (The free country is no longer free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111
I'm not going to flame you, though I disagree with you.

I see the Tea Party as the 101st Airborne Division during the Battle of the Bulge, and the Washingtonians are the Germans telling us to surrender.

Put me in the camp with the Tea Party Freshman that are saying "NUTS"!!!

86 posted on 07/29/2011 9:54:40 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
1) - The 401K's I am talking about is the market tank. When people watch their retirement disappear...they will be pissed. And I know not all $100 Billion are workers...won't matter. Those on assistance will riot. Food prices will sky-rocket and that will cause a run on the grocery stores.

2) - Obamas supporters will still vote for him. They are democrats. Why? Because, as I said in my first post, he will...with the power of the MSM...successfully blame the GOP. His base will buy it. He will tell them the only way to get their checks back is to ensure they get him back in office and every GOP out of office.

Yes...they will riot. Doubt what I say? Just watch.

End of discussion.

87 posted on 07/29/2011 10:08:01 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
We should really avoid this kind of trash in this forum.

I share your distaste but reluctantly disagree. We need to see it, and to know that this stooge Yeomans has secured a lodgement at Politico, where he is doing hardcore "black" hate-propaganda.

We need to register and remember his name. As Caligula told Tiberius, "First we make a list. A long, long list."

88 posted on 07/29/2011 10:14:52 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
They forgot to add "Hooligans", "Economic Wreckers", and "Blood-sucking Kulaks"!

And "capitalist-roaders", and "gold bugs".

We'll see them all, eventually.

89 posted on 07/29/2011 10:16:22 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
I'm not blaming the tea party FOR the battle per say...I just think they are choosing the wrong battle field.

The battle field should be the 2012 budget...not something that has never...historically...been a battlefield.

If the leadership were going to choose THIS battlefield to die on, they should have done so with a good plan. Put forth ONE bill. ONE. Then say...I've shown you mine...now show me yours. According to the little cartoon...that's the way the process works. Then walk away.

So...either fight the battle at the 2012 budget or fight it the RIGHT way by walking away and IN UNISON.

the leadership should NEVER have offered up MULTIPLE plans without getting ONE counter proposal from BHO or Reid. STUPID.

90 posted on 07/29/2011 10:17:40 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
I am trying to understand the reasoning behind statements made by people like the one that wrote this column.

That's because he isn't doing "debate" or "reasoning" or "discussion" or "advocacy".

The article is pure, murder-hearted destructive black propaganda against a hated Other. This person is your deadly enemy, and he comes before the public encrusted with public honors and trusted offices bestowed by Ted Kennedy, who was accustomed to having private, off-the-record, closed-door meetings with people like Anatoliy Dobrynin and Yuri Andropov, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

That's where this guy is coming from. He is a blackhearted traitor, and you are a patriot. He hates you as soon as he identifies you. There is no discussion. Capiche?

91 posted on 07/29/2011 10:30:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

These people won’t call terrorists, terrorists. But no prob calling the tea party terrorists.


92 posted on 07/29/2011 11:18:44 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Oh yes...Politico. The place of which I never tread (right up there with The Business Insider). ;-)


93 posted on 07/29/2011 11:34:08 AM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (I'm called a 'teabagger'? Well, get over here liberal and I'll show you what that means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

These Politico people are mentally challenged.


94 posted on 07/29/2011 12:29:15 PM PDT by RoadTest (Organized religion is no substitute for the relationship the living God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
It's worse than you think. The New World Order gang or gangs fabricated the so-called debt limit crisis for the purpose of stampeding the Public into supporting another abrogation of the Constitution and its limits upon the power of the Federal Government and the Office of the President.

The Cut, Cap, and Balance bill and amendment to the U.S. Constitution effectively transfers the power to appropriate funds and taxes from the originator, the House of Representatives, and the Senate to the Office of the President. Doing so further enhances the power of the President to DICTATE the expenditures or outlays, the receipts or taxes, and control of the entire economy, in addition to the power to wage offensive wars, make treaties with foreign states and organizations, and generally function as a dictator and/or tyrant. All with the blessings of the Democrats, Republicans, and the TEA Party.

A Federal law establishing a budgetary limit was already established by Congress and the DNC with:
PL 95-435,1978, “Sec. 7. Beginning in fiscal year 1981, the total budget outlays of the Federal Government shall not exceed its receipts.”

Ask yourself why is an amendment which further destroys the Constitution needed when the Federal law prohibiting such budgets was already a Public Law in 1978? Was it repealed, or is it just being abrogated?

Do you really want to support another Democrat and Republican effort to strip the American citizens of their right and ability to limit the Federal Government's power to tax and spend and spend and tax at will and impunity? If not, how are you going to communicate your opposition to the representatives in Congress?

95 posted on 07/29/2011 4:14:44 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Make no mistake: if the GOP is destroyed by this tantrum in the next few days, they will be out of power for a very, very long time .... You will have accomplished what the Democrats have not been able to do in 157 years or longer.

Funny, I thought that John McCain and the rest of the RiNO trimmer-squishes did that in 2008, did I miss something?

You do remember the 2008 and 2006 campaigns, and the excellent Denny Hastert curatorial, middle-of-the-road Speakership that made it all possible, by coddling miscreants like Mark Foley and not expelling immediately grafters like "Cold Cash" Jefferson and stepping on "bridge-to-nowhere" pork-packing Republicans, don't you? Why do I have to review this?

You can go back to driving railroad spikes through Sarah Palin's eyes now.

96 posted on 07/31/2011 4:18:39 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

ROFLMAO! Someone call Supernanny!


97 posted on 07/31/2011 4:21:47 PM PDT by Chandalier (Obama is a Chicken Hawk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson