Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House, Republicans Strike Tenative Deal To Raise Debt Ceiling
ABCNews ^ | July 30, 2011 | Jonathon Karl

Posted on 07/30/2011 8:21:33 PM PDT by Beaten Valve

ABC News has learned that Republicans and the White House have struck a tenative deal to raise the debt ceiling before the Aug. 2 deadline.

It's not done yet, but here is the framework of the tentative deal they have worked out, according to a source familiar with the negotiations:

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: debtdeal; debtdealcavein; debtdealshowdown; debtgraphics; deficit; deficitgraphics; democrats; republicans; taxes; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 481-492 next last
To: TexasFreeper2009

Agreed that jobs and the economy will be the real issue but I think this was an opportunity to get so much more. I think Obama would have folded in the end. Not totally. Not “ok, lets repeal health care” level folding. But we could have gotten the BBA to the states along with every thing else, and I think that would have been a much bigger win.

81 posted on 07/30/2011 8:51:56 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148

Guessin the paulnutz could blame it on the bilderburgers.

82 posted on 07/30/2011 8:52:05 PM PDT by dusttoyou ("Progressives" are wee-weeing all over themselves, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

“Good point. When has a tax increase EVER been attached to any previous debt ceiling increases?”

The deal that we thought was happening when Boehner walked out? Bozo tried sticking in a bunch of tax increases in at zero hour.

83 posted on 07/30/2011 8:52:37 PM PDT by F1reEng1neRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rjeffries
Obama is going to lay claim to the bi-partisan “moderate” dealmaker and toot his horn over the next couple weeks.

And he gets $2.5 trillion to fund his ACORN re-election team.

84 posted on 07/30/2011 8:53:02 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

It’s worse than that. Obama put Medicare on the chopping block. The liberals in the House such as Conyers will lose their minds over this.

Of course, the “deal” is ridiculous. It does nothing to stave off a financial collapse, which now is inevitable. The only question is when?

85 posted on 07/30/2011 8:54:07 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The $1.8T cuts approved by Congress in Dec will be illusory, kicking in in the “out years” or counting things that were winding down anyway, like the wars.

What Obama will be able to say during the election is look, I “solved” the spending and debt problems together with the “responsible” Republicans, and it’s not an issue anymore [yes, you and I know that’s bs]. Now let’s talk about how racist my opponents are.

86 posted on 07/30/2011 8:54:14 PM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
By the way why didnt they just cut the whole friggin Health Care Bill that we don’t want and don’t need.?

Starting with the $105 billion to implement the damn thing. Michelle Bachmann is the only presidential candidate even talking about it.

87 posted on 07/30/2011 8:54:17 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

Dude, enhance your calm! We know very little about this at this point or if this is even accurate.

88 posted on 07/30/2011 8:54:39 PM PDT by F1reEng1neRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
Still has to get through the House, which we control, not Boner

Yes and i don't think it will be easy. It's bad enough for Rs that it will have trouble and the dems won't like it either.

89 posted on 07/30/2011 8:54:39 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife

“Special committee to recommend cuts of $1.8 trillion”

Proposed committee members: Harry Reid, Harry Reid, Harry Reid, Harry Reid, Harry Reid, and Harry Reid.

90 posted on 07/30/2011 8:56:14 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25

Interesting that we forgot about obamacare. I guess that “We will defund obamacare” campaign promise wasn’t kept.

Oh, well. Baptist preacher Huckabee said tonight it’s okay to lie during a campaign. Those weren’t his exact words but that’s what he meant.

91 posted on 07/30/2011 8:56:23 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I will only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Meet the New Boss

In the end, I don’t think any of this will matter. The election will come down to jobs. If unemployment doesn’t get any better, he’ll lose. If it gets better, he’ll win.

All this other stuff is for show.

If it’s still at 9% or higher in the fall of 2012, he’s done. If it’s closer to 8% or even below it by then, he’ll win.

92 posted on 07/30/2011 8:56:56 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rjeffries

No that can’t be. All those trolls said the republicans would cave and the rats would look good. Oh well they can’t always be right.

93 posted on 07/30/2011 8:57:56 PM PDT by DWC (historian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
I'm amazed that Boehner got this much. I think all along the Speaker had way more political capital than the headlines attribed to him.

If this report is true, I agree with you. I am not happy with the solution, but it was not the typical Fred Flintstone (Cave Man) approach.

94 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:11 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

They voted to repeal it.

95 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:14 PM PDT by Perdogg (0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
It looks like the GOP got everything they wanted.

IF this is the actual deal, it looks like Hussein caved more than we did.

Oh I'm sure there will be no real spending cuts other than what is in next years budget (a few billion tops), but we get the BBA vote which the Democrats desperately want to avoid, no new taxes and a chance to refight this again in November and December this year. And because the budget wars kick off soon anyway, we just might be able to keep the massive budget deficit and debt issue number one all the way through the rest of Hussein's term.

For anyone that expected real cuts, they'll be disappointed. As for me, I never believed there was any actual chance of real cuts till Hussein is out of office and we have the Senate back. Shifting the debate as far as we have is a victory in and of itself.

96 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:25 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Beaten Valve

If there is a vote Early Sunday Morning then this story is not true.

97 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:26 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obama, eat your GOPeas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F1reEng1neRed

After reading a few details, here is my impression :

It is virtually the same as the Boehner deal in the actual cuts, which will likely be back-end loaded (we expect about $10-20 billion in 2012 cuts), but the Democrats get what they want in that it will not require a second debt ceiling hike before Obama’s re-elecetion as $2.8 trillion should last well into 2013.

As for “future cuts”, well, that’s easily what Congress is so very good at. Indefinite future cuts that is

98 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism
why should no tax increase on this supposed agreement be considered some sort of victory for our side or America?

Because it would include spending cuts, with tax increases.

I am with the previous poster, though, that the BBA, in some form, must go to the states as a condition precedent.

99 posted on 07/30/2011 8:58:45 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

No taxes increases = good, but without tax cuts, this is epic fail.

100 posted on 07/30/2011 8:59:20 PM PDT by Protoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 481-492 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson