Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Agamemnon
My Bronze Star son also understands that what he did was to save innocent people from brutality and tyranny as he was also protecting US interests.

The same occurred in WWII. The two goals are not mutually exclusive.

162 posted on 08/10/2011 7:13:48 PM PDT by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star winner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan; Lurker; caww
My Bronze Star son also understands that what he did was to save innocent people from brutality and tyranny as he was also protecting US interests. The same occurred in WWII. The two goals are not mutually exclusive.

Not mutually exclusive, but saving innocent lives is a consequence of asserting US interests with the US military, not a purpose.

What your son did and mine are doing by promoting US interests may have resulted in saving innocent lives. Saving innocent lives alone is not to be confused with the definition of what constitutes US interests outside of promoting a defined US interest.

Your son's primary mission, as is the mission of my own sons', is to protect US interests. Period. Saving innocent people is often the outcome and consequence of US intervention, but never is it a solely defined purpose.

If a COC attempts to use US military assets solely for the purpose of saving innocent non-American citizens' lives absent a direct US interest for doing so, he has mis-appropriated those resources for a purpose not authorized in the Constitution.

The US military is not a global social program which exists to alleviate the suffering of the world's tyrrany-oppressed peoples.

FReegards!


163 posted on 08/10/2011 7:46:27 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson