Skip to comments.Casey Anthony's Legal Team: We're Taking on the Judge She Should NOT Be On Probation
Posted on 08/15/2011 9:35:22 PM PDT by Kevin in California
Casey Anthony's legal team tells TMZ they will fight the judge who just rejected their claim that Casey served her probation for check fraud while she sat in jail during her murder trial ... and if they lose Casey will have to return to Florida in 11 days.
It would sure be a good thing if there weren’t any more incidents like this Anthony case. No doubt there will be.
This thread where Casey is trying to get out of probation irritates me. She is never satisfied.
I doubt too many people sympathize with her on this.
She made her bed and she can lie in it. Literally.
I have no respect for her defense team.
Agreed, as always. Although anybody who would lie down on Anthony’s bed oughta think long and hard before doing it - and taking a very long shower before and after it. That lady is dirty!
She scared me the most when she claimed she wanted to have another baby. God forbid.
The thought sickens me. In her crazy mind, she probably thinks she can make it right by replacing Caylee.
Perish the thought!
Glad to see poor, financially strapped George and Cindy managed to get their vacation in before paying tribute to Caylee on her birthday. And I wonder who got what amount for the pictures?
BTW: Why anyone wants to memorialize that site is beyond me. If Caylee was my granddaughter, I certainly would not go to the place where someone dumped her like any other bag of trash. But that's just me.
“she will name the father of Caylee who she says is still alive “
But, but......she said he died in a car accident. LOL She’s so evil I’d be afraid to touch her book lest it burst into flames!
Tactics? I thought this case was about evidence. The amount of the physical evidence was enormous and should have been enough. The circumstantial evidence should have clenched it.
It almost seems as though you followed this case via the commentators, many of whom did not like the fact that the prosecution did not pull rabbits out of a hat or come up with any CSI actors to “prove” the case.
It was a simple and mostly uncomplicated murder case that did not need special effects—the evidence spoke loudly. However, the jurors still didn’t hear it, or see it either for that matter.
That the jurors were enamored of the greasy defense lawyer is proof that few of any of them should have ever been selected in the first place.
Justice was not done.
In jail and serving probation....what nonsense.
Please give me a little credit. I live in the real world, not one run by talking heads and television dramas. I think the prosecution could have done a better job of presenting the evidence.
They needed to build a better narrative for the jury. Start in the beginning, working their way through to the end, weaving the evidence together slowly and deliberately. The closing was powerful, but by then, it was too late (IMO).
Seems like an honest opinion to me. No rabbits. No tricks. No CSI moments.
So sorry I clicked on the photos to see those two livin’ it up. Cindy should be sitting in jail for perjury and yet there she is: abusing a dolphin by kissing it. Poor, poor dolphin.
I still feel at the bottom of this ugly story is the twisted Cindy.
I agree. Probabtion instead of a death penalty like she deseves is a piece of cake. She is just afraid someone might locate her and duct tape hr face ( which IMHO she also deserves)
” I think the prosecution could have done a better job of presenting the evidence.”
Did you watch the trial from start to finish? I don’t think so, and if you didn’t then your comments, like other shoot from the hip know nothings: Hannity, Levin, Whorealdo etc., are an undeserved insult to a very hard working da team. Overwhelming evidence of guilt.
“To: Protect the Bill of Rights
The so-called junk science was never used by the prosecution. It was brought in by the greasy defense attorney and his hillbilly partner during the summation.”
Jurors sittin thinkin bout anythin cept the case right there
Drinkin Kool Aid from a Mason jar
Chug a lug chug a lug
Makes ya wanna shake these fools
Go an talk to their old teachers at their schools
For drinkin Kool Aid from a Mason jar
Chug a lug chug a lug
Some really bad precedents are being set by this verdict. If you think prosecutors around the country werent paying attention to this case you are wrong. At this point if there is no DNA then the jury trial will have a high probability of failure. We live in a dangerous dumbed down era.
Shoot from the hip know nothing?? You read my comments on the live threads before you called ME a shoot from the hip know nothing (ie stoooopid)??? I doubt it.
I would say pot meet kettle, but I went back and reread my comments. I stand by them.
Blaming it all on an ignorant, “waiting for payday” jury while calling those who disagree stupid is about as narrow minded as one can be.
It was a combination of factors. I did not like the verdict. I do not want it happen again. I would rather look at what could have been done differently than to simply dump the blame in the laps of the jury. But that's just stooooopid me.
FOX reports Dr. Phil has scored the first interview with Cindy and George. Money is involved in some way, but not to Cindy and George. It is to go a foundation. (wink wink nod nod).
Cindy is a ball buster. An interview LE had with George was very telling. He talks about how “strong” Cindy is and how people think he is henpecked. He goes on to say he likes strong women and would not have it any other way (paraphrased).
He says in one of his letters to Casey that he wanted “both of my strong women” home.
I have no sympathy/empathy for any of them.
They are a classic - and I mean Freudian CLASSIC - sado- masochistic couple. (In other words, she’s a ballbuster and he gets his jollies getting kicked around.)
I don’t know why Cindy creeps me out as much as she does. I don’t think she was in any way involved with the little girl’s death but I think she knows a lot more than she’s telling. George is just not very bright.
And do they EVER get tired of the limelight? I don’t remember OJ’s family hogging the spotlight like these two.
“But that’s just stooooopid me. “
The question was simple: Did you watch the WHOLE trial?
The non-response means that you did not.
“I do not want it happen again.” None of us “want it happen again.”
Part of what I don’t “want it happen again” is for observers that did not watch the whole trial to shoot from the hip regarding the strength of the evidence.
Why should I answer? I am a know nothing. :) Yes I watched the trial. Not every second or minute, mind you. Real life tends to get in the way at times. I managed to catch up on what I missed.
Part of what I dont want it happen again is for observers that did not watch the whole trial to shoot from the hip regarding the strength of the evidence.
Say that the next time someone such as Casey Anthony walks away as free as a bird. I am not questioning the strength of the evidence. It could have been presented differently. Would it have changed the verdict? Don't know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.