Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The new Russian fighter: shown today, here tomorrow
The Indian Express ^ | Aug 17 2011 | Manu Pubby

Posted on 08/16/2011 8:51:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2011 8:51:34 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

F14ski.


2 posted on 08/16/2011 8:55:28 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Not that it matters; the Russians haven’t had an original idea since the T34 tank.


3 posted on 08/16/2011 8:58:40 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


4 posted on 08/16/2011 9:13:30 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Well, look at those big fat engine nozzels in the back...those are missile vacuums. The F-22 and F-35 do a LOT better job of masking that infrared signature than what this appear to do. The new Chinese J-20 has the same problem...twin missile vaccums sticking out the back.

Fine fighters I am sure, but I do not believe they will be near as stealthy, either radar wise or heat wise as the Raptor or JSF. And that is a huge handi-cap.

In addition, we are going to build a LOT of F-35s.

We need a President and Congress who will double and triple the number of F-22s. We only built 187 of them and then stopped. We need 400 or more.

5 posted on 08/16/2011 9:18:57 PM PDT by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Did you ever see their version of a reusable space shuttle....before they abandoned it? It was such a shameless copy of OURS it was unbelievable. They only ever launched it once or twice that I know of. It’s obviously a lot easier to copy the APPEARANCE of something than it is to duplicate its PERFORMANCE!


6 posted on 08/16/2011 9:24:15 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
It will be a good bird if they ever produce it in numbers.

A true 5th generation fighter is not cheap and current numbers will not reflect the real costs.

The Indians have been snookered.

7 posted on 08/16/2011 9:28:09 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I rest my case. ;-)


8 posted on 08/16/2011 9:28:15 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I did see one of the designers of the Buran interviewed and he said words to the effect that the laws of physics and the limitations of technology and engineering applied to everyone, and that’s why the Buran looked a lot like the Shuttle. From the first flight to the last, the Shuttle pushed the limits of a lot of technologies - it’s amazing that there were only two accidents, really.


9 posted on 08/16/2011 9:28:43 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Those big fat engine nozzles are probably quite stealthy, as is the T-50.

You can see that the nacelles are not ordinary at all.

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/1/0/7/1968701.jpg

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/5/2/8/1968825.jpg

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/9/0/8/1968809.jpg


10 posted on 08/16/2011 9:29:12 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Actually, the T-34 tank had it’s body & tracks designed by an American. So, maybe the Ruskies NEVER have had an original idea...


11 posted on 08/16/2011 9:31:07 PM PDT by Bulgaricus1 (Fill your hand you son...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Actually, the T-34 tank had it’s body & tracks designed by an American. So, maybe the Ruskies NEVER have had an original idea...


12 posted on 08/16/2011 9:31:52 PM PDT by Bulgaricus1 (Fill your hand you son...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

“...big fat engine nozzels in the back...those are missile vacuums...”

LOL! Nice observation on your part.

I’m not an aeronautical engineer, but I said the same exact thing about the vaunted Chinese “stealth fighter” (or bomber?) when the pics were posted on FR back in December 2010.


13 posted on 08/16/2011 9:36:15 PM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

You have to wonder how many Russian Cosmonauts were sent flying off into the depths of the Solar System to never be seen nor heard from again, crashed into the Moon, or just left to float around in orbit. We could only guess.....


14 posted on 08/16/2011 9:39:07 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bulgaricus1

But they were the first to use slanted hulls (causing shells fired at them to be deflected}, thus, an original idea. The slanted hull eventually became the standard in all future tanks


15 posted on 08/16/2011 9:40:12 PM PDT by doc1019 (You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Good idea gluing a spare one to the left wing tip.


16 posted on 08/16/2011 9:51:56 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

“But they were the first to use slanted hulls”

Nope. American tanks did that first too.


17 posted on 08/16/2011 10:30:46 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

How about the helicopter?


18 posted on 08/16/2011 10:35:49 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
But they were the first to use slanted hulls (causing shells fired at them to be deflected}, thus, an original idea. The slanted hull eventually became the standard in all future tanks

C.S.S. Merrimac, 1862


19 posted on 08/16/2011 10:40:44 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bulgaricus1

“Not that it matters; the Russians haven’t had an original idea since the T34 tank.”

“Actually, the T-34 tank had it’s body & tracks designed by an American. So, maybe the Ruskies NEVER have had an original idea...”


Well, the suspention on a T-34 was designed by an American - Christie suspention. I don’t know anything about the body, sloped armour etc. However, the Russians did come up with a few original ideas since the T-34. One is the Kalashninkov designed in 1947 where the original idea was to use part of the air pressure from the fired bullet’s shockwave to lock the next bullet in place for firing. The Russians also pioneered a lot of the double hull design on submarines i.e. Oscar, Typhoon, as well as exotic nuclear propulsion systems on subs such as the Alpha which used I think carbon or boron as a coolent that always had to be kept at high temperature for it not to solidify which happened on few occasions. But in turn, Alpha developed 40 knots. Let’s also not forget - a big one - Tokanak (Tauroid) fusion reactors.


20 posted on 08/16/2011 10:46:35 PM PDT by Draco88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson