Posted on 08/29/2011 12:58:04 PM PDT by martosko
Uh, the point of this thread is that Perry IS addressing “an elephant in the room” by pointing out that Social Security is a ponzi scheme (a major manifestation of runaway spending).
SS is worse than a ponzi scheme, it has the force of law requiring payment in to it.
Peter Schiff got the trustee of SS to admit as much on his radio show.
Those of you trying to control and censor what can and can't be said on these numerous Perry threads are going to drive yourselves batty trying, I guess.
Have never seen a group behave around here the way the Perry cheerleading squad behaves. And others are making the same observation.
LOL. Since you seem fond of circular reasoning and censorship, I refer you to:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2770508/posts?page=13#13
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2770508/posts?page=27#27
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2770508/posts?page=32#32
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2770508/posts?page=37#37
Perhaps then you will get what I implied and will8 specified.
I asked about the relevance of a non-sequitur and get attacked for “censorship”. Whatever. Begone, trolls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.