Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coming Collapse: “We Can Buy Time, But We Can’t Change the Outcome”(ARI going mainstream?)
Yahoo! ^ | 09/16/11 | Aaron Task

Posted on 09/19/2011 5:08:38 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

The Coming Collapse: “We Can Buy Time, But We Can’t Change the Outcome”

By Aaron Task | Daily Ticker – Fri, Sep 16, 2011 1:23 PM EDT

The Ayn Rand Institute held its annual "Atlas Shrugged Revolution" dinner Thursday night in New York City.

In attendance were a number of financial luminaries and hedge fund managers, including Peter Schiff of EuroPacific Capital, John Tamny of RealClearMarkets, Dmitry Balyasny of Balyasny Asset Management and Scott Schweighauser of Aurora Investment Management.

The setting was the tony St. Regis Hotel on Fifth Avenue but there was nothing pleasant about the primary message coming from both the speakers and those in attendance: Western civilization is heading for hell and a hand basket, just like Rand predicted in her seminal novel.

In the accompanying video, ARI president Yaron Brook tells Henry why Rand's devotees believe the global economy is "heading for collapse."

In a nutshell, Brook believes politicians and policymakers have "no solutions" for the problems facing the globe.

"The fundamental problem," Brook says, is with the philosophical belief our society has that governments can solve problems and more rules and regulations are the answer to our economic ailments.

Barring "real structural change" to our economic underpinnings toward self-reliance and true laissez-faire capitalism, "we can buy time, but we can't change the outcome," Brook says.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atlasburped; atlasshrugged; aynrand; aynrandinstitute; collapse; debt; economy; finance; thecomingdarkness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: crosshairs
Reset button maybe ... One world government would cause other governments to believe they were as capable of control as a world government and piss off all the other governments in the world for their golden goose would have been given to some other group of people, and probably chaos would come quicker. If chaos is the outcome, no matter what is done, then future history will be the history of the past, and learning from history is never an easy task. In my humble opinion, history teaches, and none of us ever learn the answers, for it is the answers which are elusive. On this planet trial and error, mostly error, rule the day, simply because nobody is intelligent enough to avoid error. (imho)
21 posted on 09/19/2011 6:05:02 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Recovering_Democrat: “But collapse is not the only option to effect that change.”

I believe you’re right. People still have a choice. We can either elect leaders who are willing to roll this back, or we can continue on the same course until it comes apart. My concern is that the longer we delay, the more difficult it’s going to be. The Democrats aren’t going to be any help whatsoever. All they want is more of the same: more taxes, more regulation, and more entitlements. I think about 20% of the population are hard core statists.

22 posted on 09/19/2011 6:05:29 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (What's special about bad? Bad is easy. Anyone can do bad. I prefer good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

no-to-illegals: “On this planet trial and error, mostly error, rule the day, simply because nobody is intelligent enough to avoid error.”

So what about the millions of Americans, including FReepers, who understand what’s going on and want to change it? Are we all unintelligent, too? No. Your point is nonsense. A lot of people know exactly how to solve this mess. It’s called returning to the small government, free market, and individual responsibility that created our great wealth in the first place.

A lack of morality is our problem, not intelligence. There are still many millions of moral Americans left who do not think it’s right to steal from their neighbors.

23 posted on 09/19/2011 6:14:23 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (What's special about bad? Bad is easy. Anyone can do bad. I prefer good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
We can either elect leaders who are willing to roll this back, or we can continue on the same course until it comes apart.

The problem isn't the leaders...the problem is the 50% of our population that don't WANT to roll this back. Go read the comments to that article at the source.

As long as their are two camps in this country who have DIAMETRICALLY opposite world-views, politicians will not solve the problem. Instead we will merely slip closer to the abyss, with both sides blaming the other and growing further alienated from each other.

24 posted on 09/19/2011 6:16:13 AM PDT by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs
The solution (unfortunately) is going to be a one-world government and a reset button.

This needs to be repeated.

There's not going to be a way of escape out of this mess, we're headed to a one world government and there's nothing we can do about it. One of the things people don't understand about Biblical prophecy about the End of Days is that the Anti-Christ doesn't come on the scene initially due to some great military victory, but because he offers a way to solve an economic crisis that seems to be unsolvable. There's a very good chance that this present crisis is the beginning of that final crisis, but only time will prove if I'm right or not.

This could very easily prove to be something other than that crisis, but considering the situation in the Middle East right now and how closely things are lining up with the description of the coming war according to Psalms 83, I'm pretty sure that this is the beginning of the final collapse.

25 posted on 09/19/2011 6:16:41 AM PDT by Avalon Hussar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Well my humble opinion is that there are NO business cycles save one, an annual cycle driven by the seasons.

The rest is driven by the ebb and flow of policies of governance, emerging technology, war and various other issues driven by human choice.

The fact that we have gone from wise to stupid in the way of monetary policy may be a recurring phenomenon but it isn’t cyclical. Human choices aren’t inevitably governed by a cycle.

Rather than holding a fatalism that is engendered by the belief in cycles in human behavior, I prefer the optimism that people can get a clue and keep it for thousands of years perhaps.

Teach your children well.

26 posted on 09/19/2011 6:30:20 AM PDT by UnChained (The "stimulus" CAUSED the economy to tank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger

Axeslinger: “The problem isn’t the leaders...”

It’s the leaders and the people who support them.

Axeslinger: “...the problem is the 50% of our population that don’t WANT to roll this back.”

True, except we don’t know what percent are committed to destroying this country via socialism. We’re still generally a conservative majority country. The rest are getting a good lesson in Obama economics. It seemed like America’s great days were over when Carter was president. Then came Reagan.

It’s not hopeless.

27 posted on 09/19/2011 6:38:50 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (What's special about bad? Bad is easy. Anyone can do bad. I prefer good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I cannot and will not say you are incorrect. I too believe in smaller government. Yes many people know what is going on and many of them are FReepers. I do not disagree. What is worrisome is governments, all governments, seek to control their populations. (imho) this is what governments believe is their objective. While smaller government is an answer, how many politicians ever speak of smaller government. (imho) not many politicians do, and how many in government ever agree to smaller government? Very few (imho). I mostly agree with your post. I do not claim to have all the answers (nor am I an expert), and will state or type, most politicians do not have the answers. History is wraught with errors, some seen, some unseen. Most are incapable of learning from the past (imho) because error is always present in each policy enacted. If I had every solution to every problem I would be someone who could not be elected for elections of those who solve problems seldom occurs. If we elected problem solvers, there would still be error for there is always consequences to every action. Reset maybe, though there will be no support for such an idea because there will be losers who played by the rules. When seeking solutions, as all who frequent this forum do, there is still room for those perceived solutions to be filled with error. Just as any thought can be full of error, any solution can be full of error. Have come to believe it is a way of life and will not change, even though I desire it to change and there be no error, yet realize humans are always going to make errors, even though many do not desire or want errors. Errors (imho) are a reflection, of free will, granted by God. Free Will to me means there will be error. America did elect a zer0, or it was told to us, we did. zer0 is one big a$$ mistake America. Error always happens (imho) because the masses are fraught with error due to free will. Do I want to give up free will? No. Great wealth always exists on paper. Paper is always worthless, unless someone is willing to recognize that paper has value. So a solution is sought when the paper becomes worthless or near worthless, as day by day the global economies go a little further down the path to holding worthless paper. War is the result of paper gone worthless. So while one argues for one side or the other, the problem(s) continue to exist, therefore I cannot argue a collapse is the only solution, though it is one solution. And will agree a lack of morality is our problem, though will argue the collective intelligence of this planet is lacking in fermenting an error-less society. Stealing is always wrong. But how do you propose to stop stealing? There are far too many who view stealing as a way of life. Many of the thieves are governments. Then there is the normal everyday thief. A beginning is necessary though there will always be those who will use their free will to not abide by the rules and will steal. If you and I could bottle the solutions, we could sell for top dollar, till the thieves showed up. (imho ...)
28 posted on 09/19/2011 6:54:10 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
40-50% don't want to destroy "this country via socialism". They just want daddy government to take care of them, or their children, or their parents or...whatever. But in the end, whether they "want" to destroy via socialism or not, the final result is the same.

I have a small glimmer of hope. 9/11 brought us together for what, 6 months? If the two different views of government's role cannot find a way to reconcile themselves with each's over. It's just a matter of timing.

29 posted on 09/19/2011 7:14:47 AM PDT by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger
Sorry that should say:

But, 9/11 brought us together for what, 6 months?

30 posted on 09/19/2011 7:17:26 AM PDT by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UnChained
Teach your children well.

Agreement and would add two words ...
Teach and prepare your children well.

31 posted on 09/19/2011 7:19:22 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger

6 hours... about the amount of time before leftists were saying we deserved it, or asking what we did to make them attack us, or pleading for no response from our government or military.

32 posted on 09/19/2011 7:21:07 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“All the supporters of socialism/communism need to be “outed” and ridiculed.”

Oh, it needs to go FAR beyond outing and ridiculing. They are traitors.

33 posted on 09/19/2011 8:12:31 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore; Aggie Mama; alarm rider; alexander_busek; AlligatorEyes; AmericanGirlRising; ...

The Ayn Rand Institute held its annual “Atlas Shrugged Revolution” dinner Thursday night in New York City. This is a short article about what was discussed. It confirms the idea that the book is a template for what is happening.

34 posted on 09/19/2011 8:21:49 AM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Avalon Hussar

“I’m pretty sure that this is the beginning of the final collapse.”

So now we have 3 views of what’s ahead:

1.Your apocayptic view; the end is near
2.Recovering_Democrat and CitizeUSA’s optimistic view; that given application of free-market policies and backing off by the federal government the bad chaos and fighting can be avoided. cyclical view that the chaos and war is unavoidable, but not necessarily the end.

Of course there is the fourth view, also optimistic, but founded on a view of human nature that runs counter to the historical and cyclical reality that no-to-illegals appears to hold: that with enough education of the ignorant, redistribution of resources by the elite exercising authority, and negotiation and compromise between competing groups, the war and chaos we all see just ahead can be avoided.

Anybody have a fifth or sixth idea of how the continuing “crisis” will be resolved?

35 posted on 09/19/2011 8:29:02 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ngat
Anybody have a fifth or sixth idea of how the continuing “crisis” will be resolved?

"Rebellion is always an option!!"--Jim Robinson

And, of course, secession.

36 posted on 09/19/2011 9:15:02 AM PDT by cowboyway (Molon labe : Deo Vindice : "Rebellion is always an option!!"--Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Rand posited only the collapse in Atlas Shrugged, and that collapse was incomplete at the end of the novel. Civilization's subsequent rise was not a part of her narrative, only a promise that there would be a new economic morality that was built around different core principles that had proven successful in the past before the corruption set in, when people got good and tired of poverty and starvation, that is.

It's fiction, of course, and it's a bit of a mystery to me why people should expect more out of it than that. Nevertheless, it contained some parts that were not Rand the theorist expounding, but Rand the observer recalling what she'd seen in Russia as a young student. Those, to me, seem the most persuasive parts of the novel, the bum's narrative of events at the Twentieth Century Motor Company being particularly brilliant in that regard.

What will fail is the question, and what will work? Rand took her post-fall communities back to subsistence farming and a barter/theft economy, which is about as low a level as is likely to be experienced here in the United States, in my opinion. Within that model, however, economics works perfectly well. She felt, and I agree, that it wasn't too far from the beginnings of the country past the point where everything had to be imported from Britain. She felt, and I agree, that the more laissez-faire economic model present at the time was responsible in large measure for the country's success, and that subsequent attempts to layer government control had fallen to the temptation of thinking that the control was the economy.

But the economies of the time weren't really isolated villages surrounded by farms, they contained local banking, local currencies, trade with neighboring regions, local defense, in short, all those things that we tend to over-idealize a bit these days as a golden age. What we sometimes don't like to recall is the failure rate of all of these but it's there in the records if we care to look.

The significant difference is in regional communication, which is the reason we have a continental economy and the reason Rand focused her novel around the Taggart trains. There was such communication before the trains, of course - the story of the Erie Canal is little less than astounding - but the national economy as we know it would be critically affected if train transportation were to fail between regions and truck transportation were to fail within them. Poorly crafted energy policies could do that; in fact, may already be doing so.

And so the focus will be on the local, which is why location out of the cities and toward small towns that have associated agricultural or fishing activities may be at a premium. I think most preppers agree on that issue. But the cities won't be empty, and as long as it is economically advantageous to run oxcarts full of grain down broken asphalt, someone will do so. But not from Topeka to Los Angeles.

What Rand posited that I do feel is likely under these circumstances is a breakdown of central authority, and I agree with her that it is unlikely to die easily or peacefully. There is very little actual violence in Atlas Shrugged, far less than I think will happen if people actually do start to starve. But we've seen breakdowns of central authority before in history. Once Rome fell and the empire split, the economic status of the independent manors changed very little; those endured through feudalism to the restoration of central authority under the Merovingians. Village life did not need central authority, but it was much more limited than the cosmopolitan empire provided. There were free cities, there was private banking, currencies, and eventually transportation. Some of this stuff took until the Renaissance to fully recover. A thousand years give or take a little.

I'd suspect that our own experience is likely to be much quicker, only because so much of this will not have to be re-invented, but merely restored. But the people who ate during all of this were near the manors and villages. Just some rambling thoughts.

37 posted on 09/19/2011 11:17:57 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

Hadn’t thought of those two.

Here’s two more:

The people become sullen and wander around wearing only expressions of sadness and despair on their faces.

And of course, WE DIE!

38 posted on 09/19/2011 11:40:02 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nip

Following up on your reply, Nip:

What have businesses been doing relentlessly at least for the past 25-30 years? Investing in technology for improved service and productivity; constantly downsizing (to improve service and improve profitability and productivity); emphasizing customer service (for improved profitability, sales and customer loyalty). The result is: businesses are sitting on lots of cash, have record levels of profitability, and are investing overseas for expansion purposes.

When is the last time any of these principles were pursued in the public sector? State or Federal? How about never?

What about our public institutions? Like our school system? Forget about it!

39 posted on 09/19/2011 11:54:59 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Ayn Rand: most successful enabler of Marxism since Marx.


40 posted on 09/19/2011 1:45:54 PM PDT by Misterioso (The worst law is better than bureaucratic tyranny. (Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson