Skip to comments.Michael Moore Threatens The Rich: Let's "Deal With It Nonviolently Now" (or violently later)
Posted on 09/23/2011 6:12:56 AM PDT by DCBryan1Edited on 09/23/2011 6:56:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
He’s also a useful idiot that would take two to the neck NKVD style should any soviet style movement ever come to fruition in this country. And he doesn’t even know it.
The part of the famous Dennis Moore skit that is virtually never commented on. I doubt the uber-libs who constituted Monty Python even gave it much of a thought. Hilarious as it was, it was the perfect refutation of the welfare system.
Commies sitting on the side, agitating the conflict.
Sounds like Mike is in favor of eating the rich.
And by the looks of him, it appears that he’s already started.
Hey Mike why don’t you write a check for 99% of your worth to the IRS...the commit ....Hari Kari...then I might believe your “Eat the Rich” rhetoric! (Then again probably not!)
And Mikes name is on many lists. I doubt that a residence in France would prevent a line through his name
“Agitating” is THE FUNCTION of a “community organizer”.
They are to agitate to the point of conflict, then impose “change” as a result.
That’s exactly what F&F was about, a backdoor push to implement gun control on the most effective and affordable tools of “tyranny resistance”.
Mikey tends to forget, the so called “RICH” can afford all of the best and latest toys ans plenty of ammo to make the toys fun to play with.
“I wonder what 400 pounds of liberal cooking on a spit smells like...”
I hope you and your commie-trash rent-a-mob decide to bring it...
did that communist windbag give away all his money? if not then he’s surely one of the “evil” rich.
Dear Michale Moron,
Better check your bank account grifter.
YOU, Michale Moore, ARE one of "the rich".
Your head would look splendid on pike Mikey.
Exactly...if the Communists ever took power, they will come after Michael Moore first, once he is no longer of any use to them, they will get rid of him, along with all of the other ‘useful idiots.’
Bleeding Kansas ... Fort Sumter ...
LOL! Save your ammo and make him walk up a flight of stairs.
I like your idea better!
‘Michael Moore Threatens The Rich: Let’s “Deal With It Nonviolently Now” (or violently later)”
Now how sweet that would be......unfortunately fat boy Michael Moore would find some hole to hide in as he is such a RAT.
Yes, there are.
The difference is that those voices on the "Right" are generally anonymous and confined to internet forum posts and backwater blogs. The Left, however, is proud to trot out their name brand bombthrowers like Moore in the MSM and encourage them to fling sparks at the powderkeg.
As with Harpers Ferry and Sarajevo 1914, these people have absolutely no idea of the depth of bloodshed they're in for once it starts and what freedom (should it still exist) will look like once it stops. These people have no clue of the horror that is neighbor killing neighbor. They think the depredations of Men At War are limited to "those people" on the other side of the planet.
What they advocate has no other logical end outside of acre upon acre of corpses.
I’d like to invite M.M. to go shooting with me sometime...
He is very much welcome to go downrange and setup my targets...
Just noticed your tagline. Very true it would seem.
Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins.
Isn’t he a Fat Belt in Kabuki, (s)
He wants to draw attention away from the fact that he’s one of the rich.
Modern war is an abstraction to the population now. Those who want it expect it either harmless or amusing a la the cinematic experience. Vietnam introduced the concept of war as TV entertainment, minimizing human cost to the general population.
Those living who knew war are passing. WWII was the last war with pervasive effect on the nation, at minimum via shortages and war-focused industry.
The US “Civil War” was the most bloody, yet still was tempered (*cough*) by the clarity of geographic division. The Mason-Dixon line pretty much clarified who was on which side who wasn’t.
The US Revolutionary War was similar insofar as “us” and “them” was pretty clear. The dividing line was several thousand miles wide (aka “the pond”).
My point, boosting yours: we have never seen anything akin to true civil war, a la Sarajevo, where both sides are thoroughly mixed together, neighbor v. neighbor, where _anyone_ could be an opposing combatant. In a twist, methinks this is why the fight hasn’t broken out yet: nobody knows who to “go after”, nor has an imperative to.
Hey, theyre still trying to do that under the radar of course.
Now we know why
(Well, we always knew that..)
SOme of us patriots know who to go after.....just sayin'.
Skip the preliminaries and let’s go to the main event.
The Left, since the 1960s, has pushed this "violent revolution" rhetoric. Some times it is louder, some times it is quieter but it is always there.
The Right merely refuses to be intimated by the Left's thuggish behavior. They say "Ok then bring it" calling the Progressive Fascists bombastic bluff.
Freedom has always requires those who love it to be willing to respond with greater violence to those who want to take freedom from others.
The USA's whole history rests on that willingness of average US Citizens to violently oppose, when necessary, authoritarian forces both external or internal.
To try, as you do, to create a fraudulent moral equivalence between the two sides is nonsense. One side, and only one side, the Political Left, is the aggressor here.
Also, your understanding of both the US Revolution and the US Civil war is very superficial. Both wars had large areas where the fighting was "neighbor vrs neighbor" with no clear cut geographic divides between the combatants. For example, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and most of the South in the Revolution. East Tennessee, Kentucky and virtually the whole area west of the Mississippi south of Iowa during the Civil War.
In fact, during large parts of both the Revolution and the Civil War, a regions loyalty had more to do with who had the most soldiers in the immediate neighborhood then anything else.
Actually, you are not quite correct on the Revolutionary war. There were torries and patriots and it was hard to tell them apart. The torry was equivalent to a spy who would work against the patriots every chance they got. So there was a lot of fighting going on in which the enemy lines were not clearly defined. I will agree however if Bozo and they boys succeed in starting an armed conflict(which I think they want)it will be difficult to tell who is who. I suppose we could do something along the lines of the French revolution and wear certain colors to confirm if we are conservatives or not.
They have no idea what ‘wealth’ is. If it were money, Zimbabwe would be #1.
Seemed the ‘Progressives’ didn’t notice what happened in Greece. The Rich left the country. ‘Capital’ does not stay where it is not treated well.
Interesting vid here...
Read your newspaper’s editorials, that’ll give you a clue...
Just sayin’ ;^)
Seen it & it is a sobering look at way may come to pass .
May I suggest a book Resistance to Tyranny by Joseph Martino . It is a primer that has lots of useful information & points you in the direction on were to find more.
Thanks for the tip, will look into it.
‘We won’t pay!’ Greek ownership class rebellion!
Just as Yuri Bezmenov warned. The first people pulled out of their homes in the middle of the night, lined up against a wall, and shot, were the Useful Idiots.
Thanks to Michael Moore and his ilk, our nation is now thoroughly “demoralized” ( to use Bezmenov’s expression).
..unless, of course, that Tory was your brother, or father, or uncle.
The thought of taking up arms against my lib parents (and vice versa) is a nightmare that makes me physically ill just in typiing this post. We had better pray to God that He sends us the wisdom, strength, and courage to do what is necessary to marginalize and control idiots like Moore and get madness under control before some fool starts something we can't stop.
If you work you are taking care of yourself, AND your taxes support about 3 more people.
The government wants to take it ALL so you will not be able to take care of yourself or anyone else.
THEN the government will OWN us all. In previous times it was called serfdom.
What I meant was just looking at them or where they lived wouldn’t have told you their political proclivities. I understand what you are talking about, I would hate to go up against some of the people I know(I won’t be friends with a lib, but I do have at least one relative who is left wing)if it comes to that.
Michael Moore, release your tax returns. Have you paid your fair share?
Perhaps he should punch himself to death first.