Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Christie Reconsidering 2012 Run, Will Decide in Days
Newsmax via Drudge ^

Posted on 09/23/2011 2:56:24 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is reconsidering his decision not to enter the 2012 presidential race — and he says he will let top Republican donors know within days about his plans, Newsmax has learned. During the past few weeks, several leading Republican donors and fundraisers have been urging the popular Republican governor to reconsider his decision not to run and to enter the GOP primary. These Christie supporters note that significant GOP support has remained on the sidelines of the primary fight. Many leading fundraisers have yet to commit to any current primary contender, including frontrunners Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. Newsmax has learned that the effort to draft Christie culminated in a hush-hush powwow held in the past week with Christie and several notable Republican billionaires.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana; US: New Jersey; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 4groundzeromosque; anti2ndammendment; antigunchristy; banglist; behindhugenewnycfees; buddyofbloomberg; buddyofgovcuomo; capandtradeliberal; chrischristie; christie; coultersboy; election2012; globalwarmingliberal; gop; indiana; islam; krispykreme; lovesillegalaliens; mitchdaniels; morerinos4u; muslimjudge; muslimlover; muslims; newjersey; nomorerinos; nonjbbgunswopermit; noredryderwopermits; northeastlibsellout; not2late4rinos; obama; palin; pennsylvania; perry; pushed911mosque; rinosgalore; romney; sharia; socialagendafarleft; toughonteacherunions; turbinepower; uberfatdemocrat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400401-444 next last
To: grey_whiskers

So you are taking the same vile and foul language that liberals use against Palin but using it against another poster on this forum who said nothing foul about Palin.


301 posted on 09/23/2011 10:40:07 PM PDT by jgge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: jgge
No, you're lying.

The language directed towards Bristol was to ask if her bull-riding was the same sexual position she used with her boyfriend / lover; to call her mother a whore to her face; and the other language towards Palin involved the violent sexual fantasies of a convicted rapist involving intercourse with a professional athlete so forceful that it would derange her digestive organs.

I was complaining about the "in your FACE" nature of the other poster's writings: not expressing a wish that anything vile would *HAPPEN* to her.

Nice try, though.

Cheers!

302 posted on 09/23/2011 10:43:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Oh, please. I know all about you and all about the mods. Half of them are posters for Palin. As for you. Get lost. You can’t debate and you can’t dance, and we’ve all been exposed to what you dream about. Just take it somewhere else. Get lost.


303 posted on 09/23/2011 10:45:33 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick. Perry/Rubio '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
What the vile attack of liberals on Palin and her daughter has to do with your vile attack on a poster? Man, are you for real?

And what is this "noob" thing? Does it mean that I am new here? Is there a rule for new people where they are not allowed to confront a poster who is posting a vile language against another poster? I am supposed to shut up because I am new? How about cower in fear or hide under my bed? And yes I support Rick Perry. We either have Perry or Romney as the nominee and I am supporting for Perry.

304 posted on 09/23/2011 10:51:32 PM PDT by jgge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
Oh, please. I know all about you and all about the mods. Half of them are posters for Palin. As for you. Get lost. You can’t debate and you can’t dance, and we’ve all been exposed to what you dream about. Just take it somewhere else. Get lost.

I've a better idea.

Why don't YOU start posting substantive posts, like I suggested?

In the meantime, if you prefer the company of other Perry fans, and you are not just a Perry operative trying to shill for him or disrupt a non-Perry-worshipping-site, try posting over at Ace of Spades or RedState. RedState in particular more or less held a purge of strong Palin fans around the beginning of 2011.

Cheers!

305 posted on 09/23/2011 10:55:55 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: varina davis

Maybe Alaska? I hope!


306 posted on 09/23/2011 10:56:11 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

What is with Ann Coulter wanting him in the race?


307 posted on 09/23/2011 10:58:33 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I understand but the American people will not get control of the money bags....even with a change of polticians...they simply wait, stall and secure their share til it’s their turn to issue who gets it.


308 posted on 09/23/2011 11:04:39 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Anybody with that weight can not be considered a serious presidential candidate because there are clearly issues there.

Gotta agree with that. Look what everyone was saying about Bachmann and her migraines. Someone as morbidly obese as Christie could stroke out at any moment, not to mention blood pressure issues, stamina on the election trail, suitability for the stresses of the office, reputation with foreign leaders, etc. Way too many negatives on health alone before we even get to the political leanings.

309 posted on 09/23/2011 11:05:33 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: jgge
They're apples and oranges, n00b.

One is describing someone's posting history in, ahem, colorful, terms.

If you check my posting history I often accuse people of masturbating when they are being really bombastic without substance, or posting often-refuted talking points over and Over and OVER again.

The other poster fits that description to a "T".

The other cases are openly talking in public to a 20-year-old-girl FACE TO FACE to discuss her past sexual history in a LITERAL sense, calling her mother a whore to her face, and a convicted rapist talking about sexual fantasies of a public figure being subjected to forceful and debilitating intercourse.

As a Perry troll, you of course can't tell the difference, even after it's been explained to you.

Yes, "n00b" means "n00bie" (newbie).

N00bs can post whatever they want, to whomever they want, whenever they want, but if you are new, you're likely to not know past history behind things, or inside jokes, etc.

There have been campaigns to get rid of people organizing en masse for RINO candidates before (e.g. Guiliani and the infamous "bug-zapper" thread). There have been warnings to some of the more profligate pro-Perry posters that they would be well advised to tone it down.

And yes, you missed a pro-Palin poster with a 1998 sign-up date getting the zot about two weeks ago: they were spamming a Perry thread with continuous and repeated one-line insults without substantiation or invitation to any higher level discussion.

Read the totality of my posts on this thread: I invited the other poster to back up their positions with facts, and also gave the name names of two other openly pro-Perry sites in case they felt their pro-Perry posts weren't being properly welcomed here.

Note, by the way, that this other poster *PING*ed the mods and then posted to me (#303) that "they know all about the mods, half of them are pro-Palin posters."

Check up the other poster's history going back a few weeks, and you'll see that they usually have hit-and-run posts amounting to "Perry will win. Perry must win. Nobody has any chance. [Insert anti-Palin talking point of the day/week here.]" etc. etc.

If you want to support Perry, great, but advocate for him on substantive grounds, not just "well, he's electable and Palin can't win" or "Yeah Rah Rah Texas Perry Rah Rah."

Cheers!

310 posted on 09/23/2011 11:11:41 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK
I don't think I would mind a Perry/Rubio candidacy. I'd be willing to vote that way if that's how it goes.
311 posted on 09/23/2011 11:15:03 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: erlayman
Not so sure I'd agree that, “It was always Mitt’s to lose”. He sure didn't win in 2008. If he's the “best” the GOP can offer, then he won't have my vote. He is the quintessential RINO. If "they" haven't understood this yet, there will be a BIG surprise on the first Tuesday in November, 2012.
312 posted on 09/23/2011 11:21:32 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

Don’t be discouraged! Reagan did terrible in the early debates and look what happened. Give it time, things will become clearer as the time nears.


313 posted on 09/23/2011 11:28:02 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Yuck, GW! Did you hafta post that?????


314 posted on 09/23/2011 11:31:45 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Ann fancies herself a Kingmaker.... Funny that!


315 posted on 09/23/2011 11:33:13 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
I don't think I would mind a Perry/Rubio candidacy. I'd be willing to vote that way if that's how it goes.

Not only is Rubio conservative but he'd bring the hispanic vote which I think is why Perry is being such a doofus on illegal immigration.

316 posted on 09/23/2011 11:34:27 PM PDT by ozarkgirl (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
It was either that or Casablanca...and since according to Rush, Bill just torpedoed a lot of Obama's PR initiatives, it could be they're trying to soften up the ground for a Hillary run.

Cheers!

317 posted on 09/23/2011 11:36:10 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I would not put it past Bill&Hill to pull that fast one. I said on another thread recently that there may have even been a “grand bargain” between Obama and the Toons that, in exchange for Hillary conceding the nomination to him (without spilling the beans on all the dirt she had on him). This deal may be that she got the SOS position - for the extra experience - in exchange for her stepping in to “save” the Democratic party's hold on the Presidency when Obama crashed and burned in his first term. He sure did a lot of damage in the years he's been in, which may be another part of the plan. The Clintons, I doubt, could have done all of that had she been elected. I don't know, maybe I'm imagining too much but I have learned in my old age that few things happen by accident in politics.
318 posted on 09/23/2011 11:53:10 PM PDT by boatbums ( Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
There is no perfect conservative.

If there were, we wouldn't need a checks and balances. Sometimes I think some have forgotten that we have a Senate to win and seats in the House to win. Seems like they are saying the heck with Congress, let's get us the perfect candidate.

319 posted on 09/24/2011 12:28:30 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Wow! If he flies they must have to wait until they are airborne before allowing him to go to his seat in first class


320 posted on 09/24/2011 12:32:51 AM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

This is all because they are afraid of Sarah.........that’s what this is all about, and that’s why money is on the side lines...awaiting Sarah.....these gop elites are scared they will lose power, as they should, and for my money the biggest enemies in DC AFTER bambi is Hairy harry and Chucky chesse


321 posted on 09/24/2011 2:18:03 AM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

I`d been hoping for the same thing. Beating Obama should be the goal, but the Repubs` attacks on each other are more intense than I`ve seen in a long time. Certainly they need to one-up each other, but every message should be centered on undoing the massive damage the enemy has done to this country. Instead they`re just giving him a free set of TOTUS talking points.


322 posted on 09/24/2011 2:23:51 AM PDT by ScottinVA (With "successes" like the Libya adventure, who needs failure?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vision
Coulter is happy tonight for some reason.

Why does Coulter think she is crazy about him? Does anyone know. Just curious.

323 posted on 09/24/2011 3:01:33 AM PDT by Bellflower (When the word "holy" is used it must be used with respect and reverence for The LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

I’m not voting for Romney, and that is what it is coming down to. It’s his turn, we’ll start hearing. I’d vote for the fat man.


324 posted on 09/24/2011 3:36:27 AM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RushIsTheMan; novemberslady

You know it is getting bad when you are tired of listening to the fill ins.


325 posted on 09/24/2011 3:46:44 AM PDT by Average Al (Forbidden fruit leads to many jams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound; All

.

CHRISTIE DEFENDS MUSLIM JUDGE APPOINTMENT:

“But it was a follow-up question on the fear of Sharia Law that set the governor off. “Sharia Law has nothing to do with this at all, it’s crazy!” he cried. “The guy is an American citizen!” He concluded that the “Sharia Law business is just crap… and I’m tried of dealing with the crazies,” adding with disgust and frustration that “it’s just unnecessary to be accusing this guy of things just because of his religious background.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/chris-christie-lashes-out-at-crazies-after-appointing-muslim-judge-the-sharia-law-business-is-just-crap/

NO THANK YOU!!!

.


326 posted on 09/24/2011 3:48:49 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I for one and weary of Bristals various “meet the Press” episodes Grey. She does her mother no service by these antics. Bristal needs to cool her jets and I don’t see that happening any time soon.


327 posted on 09/24/2011 4:04:32 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: patriot08

Christie grabbed attention and some adoration because he BULLIED the unions.

Which means he is a bully when something doesn’t go his way.

Notice how he is stamping his feet about the muslim judge:

“If you don’t agree with me - you are stupid”.

Not showing respect for American Citizens on one issue - will be repeated on many issues.


328 posted on 09/24/2011 4:20:09 AM PDT by sodpoodle (Despair: Man's surrender. Laughter: God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
I'm in agreement with you! Yes, we want the most conservative candidate as possible, and no, we're not going to get the perfect candidate. Although, I probably disagree with Christy on social matters, his fiscal discipline, to date, has been quite good. Going up against the unions in New Jersey isn't the easiest thing to do, but he has and successfully. I like his candor and his no nonsense approach to issues.

Perry, who I also really like and would likely support, has gone off the deep end on immigration and has given me pause as to supporting him.

329 posted on 09/24/2011 4:24:24 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

Good grief! I so strongly agree with you!!!

There is NO perfect candidate and never will be. The acronym, RINO, has been overused to the point of sheer stupidity.

(I would not have included Romney in that same list of examples though.)


330 posted on 09/24/2011 4:55:32 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

I don’t care for Ann Coulter much.

She is just in it to sell insipid books for coffee table displays...


331 posted on 09/24/2011 4:56:18 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood ("Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Well this should make Ann “yes that’s an adam’s apple” Colture wet her panties.

Another Big Government New World Order socialist running as a republican.


332 posted on 09/24/2011 5:00:20 AM PDT by stockpirate ("A people get the leaders they deserve......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boatbums

Not sure how people can keep a straight face when they mention Perry and Reagan in the same sentence, I know I can not.

Perry missed the Reagan revolution, I challenge him on his aids statements that he voted for Reagan twice


333 posted on 09/24/2011 5:05:43 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (`SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

“How right you are Astronaut. If you aren’t “pure” here on FreeRepublic, then you are outcast. Reagan would be thrown to the wolves.

Ironic as hell.”

I agree with you and Astronaut. Then there’s the horrible verbal abuse he is getting from the same people for his weight. Very low-class.....and not charitable at all. What has happened to FreeRepublic lately?

These same types would not only call Reagan a RINO. They’d probably find similar fault with God Himself.


334 posted on 09/24/2011 5:13:16 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

“Way too fat.”

Can you make any other superficial statements of criticism? If you are “way too skinny,” should we even listen to you?


335 posted on 09/24/2011 5:16:38 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

“They are convinced they are somehow advancing the conservative cause and seem oblivious to the fact that they are making it more and more likely a moderate or a liberal will be our next POTUS.”

Agree. By the way, I really like the way Gingrich has performed in the debates. I’d LOVE to see him take on Obama in the same venues. The expressions on Obama’s face alone would be worth watching. ;-)


336 posted on 09/24/2011 5:22:37 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

“And, yes, a handful of Freepers are posting attack pieces directly from websites and organizations paid for by Soros.”

I had begun to suspect some of this....because the ideas are certainly similar.


337 posted on 09/24/2011 5:24:45 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

“Coulter is an idiot.

Her praise of Chris Christie is only proof of this.”

How many books have you written that support the conservative cause? What? You only write ad hominem posts, you say? Ahhhhhh.... I thought so....


338 posted on 09/24/2011 5:30:00 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“...she’s nothing but a ‘do as I say, not as I do’ mouthpiece.”

Really? Do you have any substantive proof for that?


339 posted on 09/24/2011 5:31:58 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: stevecmd

I’m 350 and he’s a LOT bigger than I am, from every photo I’ve seen. Betting he’s at least 400-450lbs.


340 posted on 09/24/2011 5:33:04 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

How about a Crist/Christie ticket? It’d be like a RINO Laurel & Hardy.


341 posted on 09/24/2011 5:35:09 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

“Isn’t he pro-abortion and gay marriage?”

NO!


342 posted on 09/24/2011 5:35:54 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

“Conservatives are doing more to kill our possible nominees than the Libs. Obama must be laughing his ass off while we find our own candidates weaknesses and beat them over the head with it.”

Agreed. Such people are CWAB (Conservatives Without A Brain)...or else they are liberal trolls.

I’m tired of seeing so much pure ad hominem and childish name-calling. If one has a substantive reason for concern regarding Christie....then post that and a link to some sort of proof. Sheeeeshhhhh....


343 posted on 09/24/2011 5:45:45 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
To Retired Greyhound: Photobucket
344 posted on 09/24/2011 5:46:21 AM PDT by RetSignman (It's Fall...the "Goebbles Warmers" are packing their bags , migrating for their winter caves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww

“Can’t get over you guys not understanding vetting candidates.”

Vetting has SUBSTANCE. It’s not merely ad hominem and name-calling (RINO being the most overused name recently). I think many people are wanting a lot MORE substance in judging these candidates.


345 posted on 09/24/2011 5:53:22 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

I know Krauthammer is now considered a subversive tool by some on here, but he nailed it last night. We have to defeat Obama otherwise four more years of this makes our conversion to a socialist democracy like Europe irreversible. We have to take the most conservative candidate who can win.

I like Christie for his fiscal views but his time passed here in the last month. If we aren’t going with a very conservative candidate, the current version of Romney is looking acceptable to me. He appears to be a safe and polished choice who is gaining momentum.

If you could get Rubio on the ticket, a Romney-Rubio ticket would be extremely formidable in the electoral college. We would have a shot at taking PA, MI, WI and maybe a couple east coast states while still keeping the South.

Then you let Paul Ryan and Jim DeMint set the agenda in the House and Senate respectively. Romney would follow along. This scenario could work out ok.


346 posted on 09/24/2011 5:53:34 AM PDT by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Vetting has SUBSTANCE. It’s not merely ad hominem and name-calling (RINO being the most overused name recently). I think many people are wanting a lot MORE substance in judging these candidates.

I guess in Christie's case "vetting" is an appropriate word.
347 posted on 09/24/2011 5:57:47 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

No I voted for him for governor.

If he ran for President he would not win the primary in NJ nor the General.


348 posted on 09/24/2011 6:01:12 AM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“And very presidential looking./s Last month he went to hospital with breathing problems.”

Why is this a problem? I don’t think Cheney was in the best of health and he was one NY Times article away from the Presidency.

Christie will not run for President. But he did just throw his hat into the ring for VP. In my humble opinion, Christie or Rubio will be the VP pick. Just a question on which one will help Palin the most.


349 posted on 09/24/2011 6:01:38 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarahcuda in 2012. Nothing but Net!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I’m saying he would be weak in is own state.

Look at his latest job approval numbers for a start.


350 posted on 09/24/2011 6:02:58 AM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012 - GAME ON!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 251-300301-350351-400401-444 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson