Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Counting the Democrat Bodies Involved in a Taxpayer-Guaranteed Loan
Townhall.com ^ | September 25, 2011 | Amy Oliver

Posted on 09/25/2011 8:04:03 AM PDT by Kaslin

By now it’s obvious that the Solyndra scandal never should have happened.  It’s not even a case of Monday morning quarterbacking. A number of people involved could see the disaster coming.

There is a larger principle here. Government should not use taxpayer money to socialize risk while privatizing profits. Examples such as Colorado-based Abound Solar, which received a $400 million loan guarantee, prove that crony capitalism simply rewards the well connected at taxpayer expense.

Abound Solar

Abound Solar, according to its Web site, “produces next-generation thin-film cadmium telluride solar modules” and “is committed to reducing the cost of solar electricity to levels competitive with fossil fuels.”

It is the brainchild of former Colorado State University (CSU) Professor W.S. Sampath and two former students Kurt Barth and Al Enzenroth.  It began as AVA Solar and then incorporated into Abound in 2007.

The Web site says it employs 350 people in three Colorado locations.  Its Colorado manufacturing plant is located in Weld County, which granted Abound up to $100,000 per year for the next ten years in business property tax rebates.  According to sources, the reason for the rebate was job creation intended to benefit Weld County residents. Yet when officials and interested parties ask how many of the 350 jobs have gone to Weld County residents, the solar company does not answer.

Currently Abound has a manufacturing capacity of 65 megawatts expanding to 850 megawatts – at some point. However, in 2010 it manufactured only 30 megawatts. One wonders, if Abound can produce more, why doesn’t it?

The Web site does say it is “growing,” and news reports claim the company plans to add anywhere from 850 to 1,000 employees thanks to a $400 million taxpayer-guaranteed loan Abound received in July 2010.  The taxpayer cash is so it can expand its manufacturing capabilities to a facility in Tipton, Indiana. The Indiana Economic Development Corporation “extended up to $11.85 million in tax credits and $250,000 in training grants” as well.

Abound Solar further claims $260 million in private investments, part of which came from billionaire medical heiress Pat Stryker’s Bohemian Companies.  This is where the story gets interesting.

Thanks to Independence Institute investigative reporter Todd Shepherd, we still have access to the Web page that lists Bohemian as an investor even though it does not appear on the company’s current Web site. The exact amount that Stryker has given is not public at this time. Also, CSU and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) are listed as funding resources.

Total public and private monies equal $673,100,000. Assuming Abound can “create” some 1,350 jobs, that is $498,593 per job, of which $360,000 comes from public coffers.

However, Abound’s Indiana manufacturing facility is not scheduled to open until 2013 or 2014, which seems like a long time to wait to “create” jobs and turn a profit.

As a comparison, the Denver Bronco’s stadium cost $364 million to build of which 68 percent was publicly financed.  With a yes vote from taxpayers in November 1998, construction began in August 1999 and was completed in September 2001. 

This is not an endorsement of publicly funded professional sports facilities but rather an assumption that the Broncos management didn’t want a disruption in cash flow that could come from the inconvenience of a lengthy construction project.

I asked Abound if the company is still on track for a 2013 expansion and received no response. For most companies, time means money except in solar panels.

Pat Stryker

Forbes lists medical heiress and founder of Bohemian Companies/Foundation Pat Stryker as number 331 of its top “400 Richest People in America.” Worth $1.3 billion, the Fort Collins resident could single-handedly fund Abound Solar and still be well above the poverty line.

While some of her fortune has gone to Abound Solar, she also has chosen to donate more than $2.2 million (probably a low figure) to Democrats and their causes over the last several election cycles. Beneficiaries include Barack Obama, one-term Congresswoman and Fort Collins resident Betsy Markey, and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar when he successfully ran for U.S. Senate in Colorado.

Stryker is also a charter member of the notorious “gang of four” which changed the political landscape in Colorado through an organization called the Colorado Democracy Alliance (CoDA).  Their success was titled the “Colorado Miracle” and is being replicated in other states.

Congresswoman Betsy Markey

With the help from Stryker in 2008, Markey beat incumbent republican Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave in Colorado’s conservative 4th Congressional District.  Abound Solar, Pat Stryker, and Colorado State University are all in the 4th CD. Between 2008 and 2010 election cycles, CSU employees also donated nearly $27,000 to Markey’s campaigns.

When the Waxman-Markey (named for Congressmen Henry Waxman and Ed Markey) cap and trade bill, which included a national renewable energy standard, came up for a vote, Congresswoman Markey danced around the issue for weeks because it wasn’t a popular bill in the 4th CD. Ultimately she voted “yes.” 

In an interview on my radio show following the vote, Markey cited “green jobs” as one of her reasons.  What she didn’t cite was her relationship to Pat Stryker and Abound Solar or the $2,000 campaign contribution she received from Henry Waxman the night before the vote.

Shortly after the vote, Abound Solar was part of a group that helped pay for TV ads thanking Markey for saying yes to Waxman’s bill. Todd Shepherd exposed the politically incestuous relationship and suggested:

“[T]he connections between Representative Betsy Markey (D, CO-4), billionaire heiress Pat Stryker, and Abound Solar, appear to have all of the fingerprints of the kind of pay-to-play agenda that has left many Americans wondering how they got stuck with unpopular bills such as cap and trade, formally known as Waxman-Markey (named after a different Markey)

Markey also urged the approval of Abound’s $400 million taxpayer-guaranteed loan. The Denver Business Journal reported, “Abound applied for the loan guarantee more than a year ago, and Markey and other members of Colorado's congressional delegation pushed for approval.”

Colorado State University

Located in Fort Collins, Colorado, CSU fancies itself the “green” university

“Colorado State University is internationally known for its green initiatives and clean-energy research including alternative fuels, clean engines, photovoltaics, "smart" grid technology, wind engineering, water resources, and satellite-based atmospheric monitoring and tracking systems. It's also known as a "green" university for its sustainability efforts on campus and abroad.

Abound Solar founders got their start at CSU as the university bragged in a 2007 press release.

Stryker also has a connection to CSU, having donated millions the university.  Furthermore, former CSU president Al Yates became Stryker’s mouthpiece and representative on CoDA. The Blueprint, a must-read book from Adam Schrager and Rob Witwer, details the Yates-Stryker relationship along with how democrats won control in Colorado.

Finally, CSU is home to the Center for the New Energy Economy headed by former

Colorado Governor Bill Ritter, a renewable energy activist, and funded by private donations, a third of which came from Stryker’s Bohemian Foundation. Ritter now makes $300,000 to promote renewable energy throughout the country.

Governor Bill Ritter

With the help of CoDA and Pat Stryker, Democrat Denver District Attorney Bill Ritter won the 2006 Governor’s race. His one term legacy is the state’s New Energy Economy, 57 pieces of legislation to move the state from reliance on less costly on fossil fuels to renewables. Ritter is a true believer, an eco-evangelical, who signed laws mandating 30 percent renewable energy standards and fuel switching.

In April 2009, Governor Ritter hand-delivered two letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu who was touring NREL. One letter urged the Department of Energy to grant a $300 million taxpayer-guaranteed loan to Abound Solar:

“This request for $300 million would allow [Abound Solar] to triple production capacity within 12 months, develop a second manufacturing facility within 18 months and hire an additional 1,000 employees.

Abound received $400 million in July 2010. By all accounts, the solar panel company will not meet Ritter’s original promise of triple capacity in a year and a new facility within 18 months. Just won’t happen that fast.

When Ritter left office in January 2011, he became the Director of the Center for the New Energy Economy at CSU and one of the highest paid administrators on campus, thanks to Stryker.

President Barack Obama

President Obama received $11,700 directly from Stryker and Joseph Zimlich, who is a director at Abound Solar and is also associated with Stryker’s Bohemian Foundation. No doubt Obama benefitted as well from Stryker’s donations to other democrat causes including Campaign Money Watch and Democrat White House Victory Fund.

In Obama’s weekly radio address on July 3, 2010, he announced an acceleration of “the transition to a clean energy economy and doubling our use of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power – steps that have the potential to create whole new industries and hundreds of thousands of new jobs in America.”

He said that Abound Sola:

“will manufacture advanced solar panels at two new plants, creating more than 2,000 construction jobs and 1,500 permanent jobs.  A Colorado plant is already underway, and an Indiana plant will be built in what’s now an empty Chrysler factory.  When fully operational, these plants will produce millions of state-of-the-art solar panels each year."

That radio address was the formal announcement that Abound Solar received a $400 million loan guarantee courtesy of U.S. taxpayers. Taxpayers get the risk while individuals get the profit.

To recap, Abound Solar receives support from Pat Stryker and Colorado State University both of which fund and promote Congresswoman Betsy Markey. She in turn votes yes on Cap and Trade and urges the federal government to approve the Abound loan.

Abound Solar then contributes to TV ads thanking Markey for her yes vote on Cap and Trade.

Governor Bill Ritter hand delivers letters to Energy Secretary Steven Chu urging the DOE to grant the loan guarantee.  When he decides not to run for a second term, he is offered a job at CSU, which is funded in part by Pat Stryker.

President Barack Obama benefitted from Pat Stryker’s political donations.  In July 2010, he announces a $400 million loan guarantee to Abound.

Can’t get a $400 million loan? Apparently you don’t know and fund the right people.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: aboundsolar

1 posted on 09/25/2011 8:04:07 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Colorado Miracle article from 2009.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/article/?q=ODJmYWRlMDkxMzYxMzM1NTY3YmMwZDc1MzZmMmYzMGU=


2 posted on 09/25/2011 8:17:16 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Time to move forward not to the center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The democrap party remains a crimnal enterprise more powerful and far reaching than any mafioso could even dream of. So long as media whoredom continues to be their propagaqnda arm, they will thrive as the Republic crumbles around US.


3 posted on 09/25/2011 8:17:45 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Looks like Ritter learned his crony capitalism back-scratching pay-to-play lessons from a certain Texas governor much in the news in the last few weeks. Hope the Thrilla from Wasilla is keeping good notes: you could run a convincing campaign against leaders of both parties based on your opposition to this kind of taxpayer-financed mutual back-scratching.


4 posted on 09/25/2011 8:18:46 AM PDT by Spartan79 (I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Obammany Hall.


5 posted on 09/25/2011 8:19:24 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
Shocking revelations!
6 posted on 09/25/2011 8:32:31 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

The good news is Cory Gardner-R beat corrupt Betsey Markey-D with 52% of the vote. Markey got 41%. I wonder if they will run Markey again in 2012.


7 posted on 09/25/2011 8:52:07 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Covers most of the biggest scumbags in this state.


8 posted on 09/25/2011 8:59:14 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cadmium telluride—sounds like a potential pollution problem from manufacturer, doesn’t it? And, isn’t this material limited to under 1/2 the theoretical maximum conversion efficiency of silicon? I think there are some manufacturing advantages, but this sounds like a long-term prescription for a failing company.


9 posted on 09/25/2011 9:20:02 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yah, well, what’s NOT crony capitalism about being too big to fail? Conservatives had better start realizing that monopolism is NOT capitalism, it is state corporatism or fascism. We let the commie yahoos co-opt us in their Wall Street sit down demonstration while they get millions of Americans are going “hell yes”, stick it to those Wall Stree b*stards. Capitalism’s tendency to evolve into monopolism has got to be regulated. We should be fighting to reinstall the Glass-Steagall legislation and repeal the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act which effectively gave commercial banks the green light to invest in crap loan derivatives and other “creative” instruments. “Too big to fail” is fascism. Solyndra is chump change. Our target acquisition sucks.


10 posted on 09/25/2011 9:30:04 AM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Well put. Sadly, there is no one to prosecute these criminal sonsabitches and ahng them for treason against the Sovereigns of the Republic, We The People. And for that we can place blame on the feckless, graft-riddled repubicans (to borrow a word from Mark Levin whom I admire greatly).


11 posted on 09/25/2011 9:36:07 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

(((ping)))


12 posted on 09/25/2011 9:36:45 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

And yes, I consider it trewasonous to put the people so far in debt that our great grandchildren will still be paying for the graft and criminal dole.


13 posted on 09/25/2011 9:37:22 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

And yes, I consider it treasonous to put the people so far in debt that our great grandchildren will still be paying for the graft and criminal dole. And add to that the eager lying and dissembling daily spewed forth from the fifth column enemy media who long ago transitioned from fourth estate of the Republic to propaganda bullhorn for the treasonous bastards and we have a Republic of sovereign voters who are so dumbed down and herded by media whoredom that guillotines are long overdue to clean the media fields.


14 posted on 09/25/2011 9:39:38 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The existence of China lays waste to the myth that green jobs are the future for America. They are for China, not for the US. Solyndra is a perfect example. We innovate here. They build there. For the same reason that manufacturing is a dying employment sector here,permanent green jobs in solar and wind which are manufacturing heavy will not take root here.The innovative Solyndra can testify to that. Once the technology is developed here, the permanent jobs will wind up in the China. In all fairness China should be funding Obama’s green jobs stimulus fantasy, not the US taxpayer.


15 posted on 09/25/2011 9:42:04 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui
Capitalism’s tendency to evolve into monopolism has got to be regulated.

Learn it or live it department: These issues were thrashed out 120 years ago and more in a German theoretical periodical called Ordo ("Order"). The magazine was the home of reform champions who argued that fair markets require good policemen who pinch anyone trying to put a thumb in the scales -- the people Adam Smith complained about, hatching their price-fixing conspiracies in the back booths of public houses in 18th-century London.

"Ordoliberals" rebuke classical liberals (laissez-faire liberals), who are 100% marketarian in their reliance on the market to correct prices and frustrate cartels. The marketarians do have some successes to point to: the London tin cartel of 30 years ago, which grew up on the example of OPEC, fell apart with rueful losses to the instigators. OPEC itself hasn't done all that well, although in their case they also had a counter-cartel, the OECD, to contend with.

The "ordoliberals" have common sense on their side: Good fences make good neighbors, and good policemen make good markets.

16 posted on 09/25/2011 11:19:03 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I wondered exactly the same thing...I may not know much about solar cell manufacturing but cadmium is highly restricted(banned in a lot of former applications) and I imagine so is telluride. No EPA screaming on this one?

The sad part of all of this is that any GOOD solar manufacturing will be painted/tainted with the Solyndra brush. Dammit, we invented solar panels here in the US, building solar arrays for satellites and I believe it is a viable addition to an American energy industry portfolio. We need to take this industry back, make it attractive to manufacture here...and get the government out of the business of picking winners/losers.


17 posted on 09/25/2011 11:25:15 AM PDT by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chuckee
We innovate here. They build there.

That would not be true if the Chinese paid human-being wages to their workers.

Zero safety, zero benefits, grinding hours, draconian management, noodles for breakfast, lunch, and dinner (and hurry up about it!) -- and wages based on convict slave labor and Malthusian labor-market mathematics.

How does anyone on the face of the earth compete with that?

Creativity and quality control are the two factors the Chinese have not mastered yet. They may never get over their lack of creativity -- their school system and traditional Chinese educational methods are potent impediments -- but for now it's enough for them, to steal our ideas, flout our patents and copyrights, and just grind out the fruits of our inventiveness in their sweatshops.

18 posted on 09/25/2011 11:26:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui

It’s not capitalism or free markets that evolve into monopolies, it is the government promotion of favored companies (corporatism, fascism or so called crony capitalism) and the over-regulation of small start-ups that seek to compete in the open market. The government’s role is to be the umpire, ensuring that companies follow the rule of law and as an arbitrator to settle disputes.


19 posted on 09/25/2011 11:51:06 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2; Clairity; Cincinatus' Wife; patriot08; smoothsailing; stevie_d_64
From the linked National Review article,

In a larger sense, this is also a story about the unintended consequences of campaign-finance reform. In 2002, Congress passed McCain-Feingold. That same year, Colorado citizens enacted Amendment 27, a constitutional amendment that capped state-legislative contributions at $400 per donor. By lowering the amounts candidates could raise and spend, these laws effectively took message control out of the hands of candidates and handed it to outsiders. (Emphasis added.)

Noting that there is "no such thing as a 'mom and pop' 527" because of all the arcane tax-law guidance required, the article's bottom line is that McCain-Feingold in 2002 handed the financing of American politics to large donors and 527 bundlers. And things like Abound and Solyndra become the quid that large donors, unrestrained and without effective competition now for the attention of politicians, demand for their quo.

Campaign finance "reform" has cartelized American politics and placed it firmly in the hands of billionaires and political fixers.

20 posted on 09/25/2011 11:57:11 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chuckee
A Very complete macro-overview of the global economy. No apologies offered or required by the post author. It is just the way it is... at this time. Sort of a problem though for those growing up expecting to land a “fat” manufacturing job in the USA.
21 posted on 09/25/2011 12:49:48 PM PDT by Lurk-know-more (tagless for the moment...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Historically, capitalist competition has resulted in monopolies with no help from government. Rockefeller and the turn of the century trusts were the result of aggressive, war lord type competition. Research Edison’s war against Tesla over AC or DC electrical grids to see how far companies will go to protect their turf and retard progress. Research business espionage, price fixing, cartels, etc., let alone the traditional cozy relationship between the CIA and businesses such as ITT, Air America, and a long list of corporate cover operations, to the point that the CIA was known as “The Company”, a rather scary notion for anti-fascists.

Conservatives suffer from 19th century conceptual models in a 21st century world. Capitalism does indeed have a tendency to become predatory, invasive, corrupt at the top and develop a ruling class aristocracy mind set. If competition is stiffled by zealot war lord practices, you no longer have capitalism, you have facism. Companies should be allowed to die due to their own stupidiy rather than an abrogation of the rules of fair business practices.

At some point, capitalist theorists are going to have to realize that if you vanquish your competition, you have nothing to keep you honest, your product improving, your management from becoming fat like ticks on a good hunting dog.

Reinstate Glass-Steagall NOW!


22 posted on 09/25/2011 1:50:42 PM PDT by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

“President Obama received $11,700 directly from Stryker and Joseph Zimlich...”

Thats about all ya need to know about that...


23 posted on 09/25/2011 2:19:46 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
“President Obama received $11,700 directly from Stryker and Joseph Zimlich...” Thats about all ya need to know about that...

That must just have been a part-time consulting job ..... normally he gets lots more .... as in the Shirley Sherrod Agriculture Department lawsuit.

That's the one that bought his "boogie mansion" in Chicago.

24 posted on 09/25/2011 10:10:38 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson