For someone who pi22es and moans about all the abuse he’s suffered at the hands of those mean, stupid, fools who have a hard time recognizing his cleverness in spotting something as inconsequential as whether or not Sarah Palin will run for president, you seem to have a hard time grasping the obvious.
If the content you refer to, and of which you seem to be quite proud, was meant to be read for content, then it would behoove the writer of said content to actually write something worthy of the word content. Unfortunately, it resembles something more akin to vilification, vitriol, pettiness, and middle school venting than anything resembling content.
When you finally post something of import, please let me know. I love to be proved wrong.
>> Unfortunately, it resembles something more akin to vilification, vitriol, pettiness, and middle school venting than anything resembling content.
When you finally post something of import, please let me know. I love to be proved wrong.<<
I need not prove you wrong. You proved yourself wrong.
All with a brain can look at your latest post and come to the same conclusion: “wait, CCdn didn’t actually spell out what he/she/it considers to be ironic. Like many liberals, he/she/it attempts to be coy when entrapped by a specific proposition. It doesn’t mean CCdn is a liberal, merely that he/she/it uses liberal thought processes.”
Your original post remains a non sequitur and you haven’t rehabilitated it by oblique statements.
Your concept of “irony” doesn’t resemble the real-world definition of the word and at this point I recommend you take the most sage advice of all time: when in a ditch and you have the shovel, the first step in getting out of the ditch is to stop digging.