Posted on 10/11/2011 8:18:29 PM PDT by Fred
In order to be found “unconstitutional” it would have to violate some article of the constitution. You’re talking about a Provision that would further limit the power of the Federal Govt as opposed to extending its power.
I can hear the campaign slogan now, “NO TAX FOR GOLDMAN SACHS!”
Yeah, and then the GS dudes can give bigger campaign contributions to Obama.
Because you are wrong and using improper assumptions, just as HC said...
9-9-9 becomes 20-20-20?
That’s part of the appeal of 9-9-9.
It’s simplicity lends itself to greater transparency.
Any time there’s a proposed increase (or decrease, as in Cain’s enterprise zones) it’ll be readily apparent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.