Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Bathhouse Setting Study HIV (25-33% of Gay and Bisexual Men in NYC estimated to be HIV Positive)
NYU 2011 Research Report ^ | 10/13/2011 | Demetre Daskalakis, MD

Posted on 10/13/2011 7:23:34 AM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash

Page 19 - In a bathouse in New York City, Demetre Daskalakis, MD hopes to solve the mysteries of long-term resistance to HIV infection. In this unusual setting he established an HIV testing site in 2007.

(Excerpt) Read more at communications.med.nyu.edu ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: aids; hivaids; homopsychoagenda; homosexualagenda; stds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: cradle of freedom

it is.

Homosexuals for some strange reason have to define their whole life , what they do, where they hang out, who they hang about with, how they act etc all about what turns them on sexually.

Now we have to put up with homosexuals giving blood.

LJ and I think wagglebee have a list and facts of homosexuals average life span, what diseases the average homosexual get etc


41 posted on 10/13/2011 5:30:31 PM PDT by manc (Beware pro OWS trolls who promote the protests on here,then send freep mail. Marriage= 1man+1 woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: manc

Imagine Thanksgiving dinner—what do you see? Mothers, fathers, grandfathers, grandmothers, aunts, uncles, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters, male cousins and female cousins. See a pattern here? There are people of BOTH sexes at a typical Thanksgiving dinner. I wonder what a Thanksgiving dinner in the gay areas of San Francisco looks like? What will their “families” look like in a generation of same sex couples with children? Would it be a world of separation of the sexes and children being isolated from whole familes of mothers and fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers, aunts and uncles etc. Gays may “borrow” familes from others such as their neieces and nephews or they may adopt children but what will their extended families be like with only people of one sex or only gay or lesbian friends. There has never been such a subculture.


42 posted on 10/13/2011 7:18:52 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
In fact, I have a personal theory that true "San Francisco bathhouse" behavior never existed for long in previous human history. Rapid spread of infectious disease would quickly wipe out any group that engaged in it.

Possible, but remember that long-distance travel was not particularly common before the 20th century, so venereal disease outbreak would likely affect only one locality at a time.

However, modern experience has been something along the lines of what you have suggested: the AIDS epidemic has slowed (but by no means halted) the rampant carnality of many homosexual men. The novelty of our times has been the homosexual couple seeking legal and societal normalization as a societal unit on equal footing with a married couple.

43 posted on 10/14/2011 3:14:35 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
A couple, heterosexual or homosexual, who have never had sex with anyone else have zero chance of contracting AIDS or HIV, regardless of what sexual activities they engage in.

Yes, although it would be wrong to suggest that if homosexual behavior can be "tamed" and "normalized" it will be innocuous (not that you have). The promiscuity factor goes hand-in-hand with the unnatural vice and the refusal to subordinate impulse to will (or even just the sheer perversity of the will)

44 posted on 10/14/2011 3:23:53 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver

Anal sex, straight or gay, is inherently unhealthy. The human bowel is loaded with truly massive amounts of bacteria, and intimate contact with it is by definition bad for your health. AIDS did not create the unhealthy nature of gay sex, it just added to it.

One of the funniest things I ever read was by a liberal minister who wrote an entire essay about how our “prejudice” against this type of sexual activity and this part of the body was merely a stereotype.

As if bacteria and parasites can be bullied into being politically correct in the same way people can.

And they call themselves “the reality-based community!”


45 posted on 10/14/2011 3:40:15 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver

In this case I was not referring to “veneral disease” as such, but rather to the many, many infectious diseases anal sex does such a dandy job of transmitting. They aren’t normally referred to as STDs even though they are indeed transmitted primarily sexually.

You hear very little about these outside of specialty medical journals because it isn’t politically correct to discuss the huge number of health problems caused by homosexual behavior, especially when promiscuous. AIDS is the only one talked about, and the normal spin on it implies that it is somehow Reagan’s fault.


46 posted on 10/14/2011 3:45:44 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Being gay isn’t the problem, being a slut is the problem.”

It is part of the lifestyle. The acts of the sodomite’s behavior include rimming, felching, both of which result in fecal consumption. Fecal consumption leads to constant contamination of the upper GI tract with fecal coliforms and this results in a host of health issues. They are now teaching children that this is acceptable.


47 posted on 10/14/2011 4:26:14 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Being gay isn’t the problem, being a slut is the problem.”

It is part of the lifestyle. The acts of the sodomite’s behavior include rimming, felching, both of which result in fecal consumption. Fecal consumption leads to constant contamination of the upper GI tract with fecal coliforms and this results in a host of health issues. They are now teaching children that this is acceptable.


48 posted on 10/14/2011 4:26:19 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

They put the dodo in the mouth?????


49 posted on 10/14/2011 6:20:37 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Clintons Are White Trash

The gay community has a problem with not just promiscuous sex, but with the sexual encounters being fueled by meth and other party drugs... which are sometimes even used in conjunction with Viagra.

This results in extended sex sessions which are very damaging to soft tissue. Blood, semen, saliva, and fecal matter co-mingle, resulting in a host of health issues as well as disease transmission.

PNP, or “Party and Play”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_and_play


50 posted on 10/14/2011 5:00:22 PM PDT by Third Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan; Neoliberalnot
In this case I was not referring to “veneral disease” as such, but rather to the many, many infectious diseases anal sex does such a dandy job of transmitting. They aren’t normally referred to as STDs even though they are indeed transmitted primarily sexually.

You hear very little about these outside of specialty medical journals because it isn’t politically correct to discuss the huge number of health problems caused by homosexual behavior, especially when promiscuous. AIDS is the only one talked about, and the normal spin on it implies that it is somehow Reagan’s fault.

Ah, I see now. Yes, it's true: rarely do we hear about the sanitary aspect of anal sex.

It is also true, by the way, that a large minority of self-identified homosexual men do not engage in anal sex, probably for the reasons you have cited.

The problem with the left's vision for "comprehensive" sex education is that there is no way not to have a slant against sexual behavior that was once (and still is in some sectors of society) considered deviant--and I am referring to everything from sodomy to oral to abortion to even many contraceptives--if you are totally objective about what those things actually are and what are the consequences or potential pitfalls.

51 posted on 10/15/2011 9:14:54 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Where have you been—yes, check out rimming and felching activities among male homos—it is the reality of the lifestyle and not what you see on TV. Fecal material is an aphrodisiac to male homos which is the main reason so many of them seek deviant sex in filthy public restrooms.


52 posted on 10/15/2011 1:11:33 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

I guess they will need to re-release the move “Please don’t eat the daisies”, “Please don’t eat the Poo Poo”.


53 posted on 10/15/2011 2:22:38 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Please remember is isn't just the HIV.

HIV positive homosexuals and IV drug users are walking petri dishes for many highly infectious diseases that normally behaving people can and **do** get!!!! TB is one of them. Not only are they immune compromised, but their lifestyle puts them in contact with many others who are carrying very dangerous and deadly infectious diseases!

Those who are not homosexual, are not IV drug users, who do NOT live promiscuous and on the edge lives, are JUSTIFIED in being very irritated with these guys and ( some) gals. With self-restraint HIV infection, and its spread to innocent victims, could be stopped in its tracks. And....Let's not forget the other infectious diseases that these guys and ( some) gals are spreading around.

54 posted on 10/15/2011 4:37:46 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson