Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe's posse delivers promised Obama surprise
WND ^ | OCTOBER 31, 2011 | WND

Posted on 10/31/2011 6:55:28 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number.

Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies.

The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault.

The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined.

Earlier this month, WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi spent 18 hours over a two-day period in Arizona briefing the Cold Case Posse on a wide range of evidence regarding Obama's eligibility.

"The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama's birth certificate, not just a microfilm copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate in isolation," Corsi explained. "An individual microfilm copy could be forged, but forging the entire microfilm reel on which Obama's birth certificate is in sequence would be almost impossible."

Also, Corsi said, the posse wants the ink-and-paper original 1961 Obama birth records still held in vault by the Hawaii Department of Health to be released publicly and subjected to independent court-authorized forensic examination.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; arpaio; birthcertificate; certifigate; coldcaseposse; corsi; eligibility; fraud; hawaii; jeromecorsi; joearpaio; naturalborncitizen; obama; posse; sheriffjoe; sheriffjoearpaio; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-178 next last
To: azsportsterman
Obama can’t win Arizona without Maricopa, and the rest of the counties in Arizona will follow Maricopa’s lead (possibly excepting Pima County, also know as LA East).

I doubt that Obama can win Arizona, period. I think they've gone for the Democrat once in the last 60 years.

101 posted on 11/01/2011 4:42:47 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

In a time of war ammunition will become in short supply, morale may be very low, intel will be uncertain.

First and foremost Obama MUST be exposed, or we will be facing futures history books with the untruth, the lies, the manufactured past.

We owe it to our future descendants to enforce the laws, not to ignore them because a few people call it beating a dead horse. They are the quitters, they have no guts, they have no fortitude, they have an alternative agenda, they are not the ones you would want near you on a battlefield.

Go Joe, give em hell!


102 posted on 11/01/2011 4:49:00 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
We now have an officially sanctioned law enforcement agency that smells fraud. Not a Dentist with a law license.

Not a good thing for Team Kenya and Jakarta Boy.

103 posted on 11/01/2011 5:16:20 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

He has volunteers doing the leg work. Retired NYC Detectives. So the good people of Arizona are not paying a dime for this.

So now they do interviews. Hawaii road trip. I can see the hospital administrator now .... “Was he born here? Hell no. Anymore questions?”


104 posted on 11/01/2011 5:27:40 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
Good luck in your future occupation as dog catcher after Obama’s cronies are done with you.

The bullseye on his back can't get any bigger. 0 has been going after him hard for three years.

105 posted on 11/01/2011 5:31:06 AM PDT by Tribune7 (If you demand perfection you will wind up with leftist Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I’d love to see Obama decked out in pink underwear.

No sweat. 0h0m0's underwear IS pink.

106 posted on 11/01/2011 5:33:14 AM PDT by melancholy (0b0z0's '12 campaign slogan: Read My Lips, Nooo...Newwww...Joooobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

If a law enforcement agency goes to a hospital investigating interstate fraud and asks for proof of SAD giving birth there, I would think the Hospital would be obliged to come clean. Telling Law enforcement agents to go scratch might not be in their interest.


107 posted on 11/01/2011 5:36:15 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

I say we flip the spin about this being a ‘fringe issue’ on it’s head.

There are hundreds of thousands of conservatives that think thhe birth certificate and NBC (father kenyan) need investigation. Any politician seeking conservative votes better be willing to listen to constituents and follow the law and evidence. This whole matter can be settled with a small amount of discovery. Let’s see the records and put the issue to rest.


108 posted on 11/01/2011 5:46:00 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
He is certainly acting his age.

So was the 91 year old buddy of mine who sky-dived a couple weeks ago.

109 posted on 11/01/2011 5:47:35 AM PDT by bcsco (A vote for Cain will cure the Pain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Amen, brother.


110 posted on 11/01/2011 5:48:14 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

“He is certainly acting his age.”

So are you!


111 posted on 11/01/2011 5:49:42 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

The Constitution is not silly. Fraud is not silly. The birth certificate/social security number/identity issue is not silly. It is fundamental.


112 posted on 11/01/2011 5:52:52 AM PDT by esquirette ("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: azsportsterman

Pick a populous county with a Democratic sheriff in some other red state. Can the Republican candidate win Georgia if the Dem sheriff of Fulton county declares the GOP candidate ineligible in Fulton county? The idea of a county sheriff having any such authority under the law is laughable on its face, but folks have been believing in fairy tales for thousands if years so don’t let reality stop you.


113 posted on 11/01/2011 6:28:11 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
This is a great idea! Let pressure State Attorney Generals to do the same!

Absolutely. Several states TRIED to enact a law requiring acceptable proof, but the Governor of Arizona would rather have Federal Money than to do her job. Same thing with the governor of Oklahoma.

Just because Barack Hussein Obama II, born in Mombasa, Kenya in the Coast Provincial General Hospital, fooled us once about his “Hawaii” birthplace, is no reason for us not to demand his true certificate of birth for the 2012 AMERICAN National Election.

There would have to be a whole lot better proof than i've seen so far for me to believe the "born in Kenya" theory. Currently I am leaning more toward a "born in Canada" theory, but I don't discount the possibility that he actually was born in Hawaii. I put no stock in it qualifying him, even if he was.

114 posted on 11/01/2011 6:37:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama is an "unnatural born citizen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
Still batting .000 I see.

Don't worry, you'll get better when you grow up.

1. No Sheriff, in any county in the United States, controls access to the ballot.

Not normally, no, but I believe he can if he wishes to do so. The Sheriff is the Highest law enforcement officer of a County, and is the only one specifically mentioned in the US Constitution. At the very least, he can stir up such a hornets nest of outrage and humiliation that it will amount to the same thing. Now whether he chooses to do so is another question all together.

2. This "posse" is a posse in the modern sense, a group of hangers on who inflate the ego of a public person, not an official (if volunteer) part of law enforcement. A real, official, investigation, could go to the grand jury, and seek a grand jury subpoena of any public records relevant to its investigation. It wouldn't have to whine about how its lack of access to those records hinders its "investigation."

It could do so if the investigation was related to a crime committed in the County. As this is an extensive Federal issue, the Sheriff of a single county lacks jurisdiction for an investigation of such crimes as may have been committed outside of his own county. Now I should very well hope they can find evidence of a crime committed IN Maricopa county, for that will allow a much more extensive effort, but till then, they have to discover what they can within the law enforcement powers of that county.

Tell Dr. Conspiracy I said to "get stuffed."

115 posted on 11/01/2011 6:51:57 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama is an "unnatural born citizen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER
If a law enforcement agency goes to a hospital investigating interstate fraud and asks for proof of SAD giving birth there, I would think the Hospital would be obliged to come clean. Telling Law enforcement agents to go scratch might not be in their interest.

If it is related to a crime having occurred within the Law Enforcement Agencies jurisdiction, I believe the Hospital would have to answer to a judge if they refused, but I don't see any angle where they can be compelled in this case. Perhaps if enough information of a crime is uncovered, it might be possible to force their hand, but till then, I would be very surprised if they didn't ignore him.

116 posted on 11/01/2011 6:55:04 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama is an "unnatural born citizen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: noprogs
Michelle can’t defend him because she has already been disbarred for insurance fraud......

I've heard rumors that Michelle was disbarred because of something to do with the Chicago mayor's office. Do you have more information on any details?

117 posted on 11/01/2011 6:58:00 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Obama is an "unnatural born citizen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: melancholy; Cicero

I’ll pass on seeing the underwear but will take Man’s Country’s and Larry’s word for it.


118 posted on 11/01/2011 7:24:10 AM PDT by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Any politician seeking conservative votes better be willing to listen to constituents and follow the law and evidence.

That eliminates Ricky La Raza as he's of the opinion it doesn't matter.

119 posted on 11/01/2011 7:25:58 AM PDT by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Quite frankly, I do not care who it (this approach) eliminates.

Imagine a politician standing in front of an audience saying:

I want your vote...but I don’t care how many of you think eligibility is an issue. The law in this matter is old and vague with regard to the Kenyan parent. The assertions of LFBC forgery are unproven in court.

So, stop presenting me with an issue that washington power-players and the press can tarnish me with. I will not pursue this issue.

Thank you and don’t forget to vote on Tuesday.
/////////////////////////

If they aren’t active in pursuing the issue - they might as well be giving this speech to conservatives that think this issue is unsettled, which is a majority of conservatives.


120 posted on 11/01/2011 8:15:41 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

They keep re-electing him to kick butt and take names, that is exactly what he is doing.


121 posted on 11/01/2011 8:47:54 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (Millions of government bureaucrats are gang raping and choking the life out of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bgill

LOL!

I assumed 0h0m0 wears them. If he follows Reggie’s admonition not to wear any, it would be a heck of an uglier scene.


122 posted on 11/01/2011 11:55:26 AM PDT by melancholy (0b0z0's '12 campaign slogan: Read My Lips, Nooo...Newwww...Joooobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
"Maybe an investigation of perjury committed against the State of Arizona when Obama signed an affidavit claiming to be Constitutionally eligible to be President..."

Standards of other criminal investigations would have to be applied, to justify the expenditures of Arpaio's office and his subordinate's time on this matter.

Statutory Authority: Is there a statute against this specific allegation of electoral fraud, or would it be under a blanket definition of fraud?

Jurisdiction: How would an action defrauding the State of Arizona justify investigation by a County Sheriff? Wouldn't it be a matter for a state agency, like the Secretary of State, instead?

Statute of Limits: Is there an applicable time frame for a charge to be made?

123 posted on 11/01/2011 1:44:03 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: research99
Ah! ....But the threat of being charged with fraud might keep Obama off the ballot in Arapio’s district ( at least) in 2012. I don't think that would do his campaign any good in that county or anywhere in the U.S.

If Obama is not a natural born citizen the it would surely be fraud for him to solicit, accept, and spend the millions collected from unknowing supporters. It would also be fraud for him to allow his name to be on the ballot.

I am not naive, though. Election officials, governors, and judges don't give a twit about the rule of law.

124 posted on 11/01/2011 1:55:20 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Triple

My feelings exactly.


125 posted on 11/01/2011 1:57:21 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy

Democrats can do anything and get away with it.


126 posted on 11/01/2011 2:01:13 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

thanks - I think that there are lots of us.


127 posted on 11/01/2011 2:06:02 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: drjimmy
You are being obtuse.

Of course the sheriff will not be able to remove Obama from the ballot, in his or any other county. He probably won't be able to charge Obama with a crime no matter what the outcome of his investigation.

But what he might be able to do, if he can prove the online document is fraudulent, is charge someone in the Obama administration for commiting fraud against the people of his county.

Sheriff Joe won't be able to arrest Obama, or most likely anyone in his administration. But what he might be able to do, is put some evidence out there that the media (or maybe even Congress, or the SCOTUS) will no longer be able to ignore.
128 posted on 11/01/2011 2:08:04 PM PDT by MMaschin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I guess so.

I guess Maricopa county will issue a proclamation of sorts, detailing why Obama is not allowed on the ballot. Then the case can go to Arizona's supreme court, and force all of Arizona to remove him. Then on to the US supremos, and these people at the Hospital can explain themselves in front of that court. That could be embarrassing for them if they in fact know he was not born there and refused to let it be known .

129 posted on 11/01/2011 2:09:52 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
"If Obama is not a natural born citizen the it would surely be fraud for him to solicit, accept, and spend the millions collected from unknowing supporters. It would also be fraud for him to allow his name to be on the ballot.

Fraud could be easily charged, as donors identified with residence within Maricopa County are easily sorted from campaign finance disclosure reports.

That's a more probable angle of success than trying to keep Obama off the 2012 ballot, as eligibility for the ballot would be under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of State's office (unless there are County statutes which somehow supercede State regulations).

A conviction for fraud might get tied up in court, as it may have to be proven that the defendant had knowledge in advance that a fraud was being committed.

What evidence exists that Obama knowingly allowed his name to be placed on the ballot in violation of the NBC requirement? Would the separate document submitted to Hawaii and signed by Pelosi, meet that standard?

Even if the BC proves BO was not an NBC, can a court get a jury to believe BO was aware of "Vittle" and other obscure and sometimes conflicting case rulings, in advance of his candidacy?

130 posted on 11/01/2011 2:47:28 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: research99
What evidence exists that Obama knowingly allowed his name to be placed on the ballot in violation of the NBC requirement?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That he taught so form of constitutional law in a law school, and should have checked out his eligibility before taking millions in donations or allowing his name to be on the ballot.

131 posted on 11/01/2011 3:03:52 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Wouldn't counsel for the defense then have an easy explanation to make for a jury:

That "NBC status" is too inadequately defined for a conviction, and the recent federal court ruling could be cited which stated that determination of NBC status is instead under the jurisdiction of Congress?

132 posted on 11/01/2011 3:13:55 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: research99
That would take years to wind its way up the Supreme Court, I would expect. But...Hey! I am not an attorney.

However...In the court of public opinion, I would think such a charge or trial of that nature would be very damaging to Obama and the Democrat Party.

133 posted on 11/01/2011 3:22:34 PM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
A court trial of this sort would be spun by MSNBC as some sort of "persecution" by "Arizona right-wingers (like those who passed the SB1070 anti-illegal immigration bill).

Same tactic was used during the Clinton impeachment hearings, to obscure the underlying facts about criminal conduct.

134 posted on 11/01/2011 3:49:59 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

” Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s no-kill animal shelter, MASH, was created to house and care for animals that have been abused or neglected by their caretakers and rescued by the Animal Crimes Investigations Unit. The purpose of the shelter is to provide a safe, healthy and healing shelter for these tragic animals, who must necessarily await the outcome of their owners’ cruelty cases in court. Hopefully, their ultimate outcome will be adoption into loving, permanent homes...”

http://www.mcso.org/Mash/Default.aspx


135 posted on 11/01/2011 3:57:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Another reason to love that man!!!

Kind to animals, harsh to criminals. Which is actually another form of mercy...


136 posted on 11/01/2011 4:23:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

SHERIFF JOE IS AT IT AGAIN!

Oh, there’s MUCH more to know about Sheriff Joe!

Maricopa County was spending approx. $18 million dollars a year on stray animals, like cats and dogs. Sheriff Joe offered to take the department over, and the County Supervisors said okay.

The animal shelters are now all staffed and operated by prisoners. They feed and care for the strays. Every animal in his care is taken out and walked twice daily. He now has prisoners who are experts in animal nutrition and behavior. They give great classes for anyone who’d like to adopt an animal. He has literally taken stray dogs off the street, given them to the care of prisoners, and had them place in dog shows.

The best part? His budget for the entire department is now under $3 million. Teresa and I adopted a Weimaraner from a Maricopa County shelter two years ago. He was neutered, and current on all shots, in great health, and even had a microchip inserted the day we got him. Cost us $78.

The prisoners get the benefit of about $0.28 an hour for working, but most would work for free, just to be out of their cells for the day. Most of his budget is for utilities, building maintenance, etc. He pays the prisoners out of the fees collected for adopted animals.

I have long wondered when the rest of the country would take a look at the way he runs the jail system, and copy some of his ideas. He has a huge farm, donated to the county years ago, where inmates can work, and they grow most of their own fresh vegetables and food, doing all the work and harvesting by hand.

He has a pretty good sized hog farm, which provides meat, and fertilizer. It fertilizes the Christmas tree nursery, where prisoners work, and you can buy a living Christmas tree for $6 - $8 for the Holidays, and plant it later. We have six trees in our yard from the Prison.

Yup, he was reelected last year with 83% of the vote...

http://myownfaith.blogspot.com/2009/05/sheriff-joe-arpaio-of-arizona.html


137 posted on 11/01/2011 4:38:10 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I love him EVEN MORE now!

His methods should be copied all over the country. And the prisoners caring for the animals!! Now that is good rehabilitation. Guaranteed they come out of there much better men.


138 posted on 11/01/2011 4:56:11 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Has anyone checked the laws in Arizona? Counties have a lot of control over their elections. Just look back to 2000 in Florida.

Those Florida counties had the presidential election in their hands. One county, I forget, kept changing how they counted the chads and Bush still came out ahead. Dade county went through the Gore precints and didn’t gain much and tried to hide when reviewing Bush precints. They were stopped.

So if the state of AZ allows the counties to determine how they conduct the voting and the candidates requirements to get on the ballot then Sheriff Joe is doing his job.


139 posted on 11/01/2011 4:58:58 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Romney as president will just destroy the country slower than Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

What’s the problem? Taxpayer dollars aren’t going to this, and you never know, he might actually bag one. Kudos to Sheriff Joe.


140 posted on 11/01/2011 5:14:11 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

obumpa


141 posted on 11/01/2011 6:13:22 PM PDT by Dajjal (Justice Robert Jackson was wrong -- the Constitution IS a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Love Sherriff Joe; and all he and Posse trying to accomplish. A larger than life thorn, in someone’s side; no doubt. That said; how long, might one guestimate; that it will take to get/retrieve. . .be allowed to see; per said rightful/legal requests from this most corrupt Administration; all of whom, care not; whose eyes they poke; per defending their illegal/illgotten; private and public, territories..


142 posted on 11/01/2011 6:20:24 PM PDT by cricket (Stop the Madness . . . Freedom must prevail. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

No more info, due to an acute lack of urgency.

I’m sure it can be found for sure, but I do believe it was for participation in/intentional ignorance of medical insurance fraud....and then she landed that $300K/yr position on that hospital board.

I heard it on a radio talk show, possibly Beck’s.


143 posted on 11/01/2011 7:09:12 PM PDT by noprogs (Borders, Language, Culture....all should be preserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: research99

Perjury statutes would apply.

The people of Arpaio’s county were victims of that perjury.

The crime has widespread enough ramifications that if it was dealt with Arpaio’s county would get the Department of Injustice off their backs so they could actually enforce other laws, so this case should take priority as a prerequisite to be able to do some of the other law enforcement that needs to be done.

Secretaries of State don’t do criminal investigations. And the integrity of both the Arizona US Attorney and AG are compromised already, if I understand correctly. I don’t know if it’s correct or not, but I was told that county sheriffs have jurisdiction over crimes that impact the citizens in their county.

I know of no statute of limitations for perjury.

See, the issues you’re bringing up are exactly what has gotten us into this mess: as long as crooks can manipulate, bribe, threaten, etc the political critter in the place they want to pillage, they have it made because nobody else is ALLOWED to hold anybody accountable to the rule of law. That doesn’t sound like America, where accountability to the rule of law is what made us different than the very tyranny we rebelled against.


144 posted on 11/01/2011 7:30:29 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters; Goreknowshowtocheat; Absolutely Nobama; Elendur; it_ürür; Bockscar; Mary Kochan; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.


145 posted on 11/01/2011 7:34:33 PM PDT by narses (what you bind upon earth, shall be bound also in heaven; and what you loose upon earth, shall be ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: research99

Phil Berg is a big democrat donor; he filed a suit claiming that he was defrauded because he donated money to get an eligible candidate but didn’t get one. The judge ruled it was none of his business; he had no standing.

There is no civil case that the courts can’t deny standing for. They denied standing to an opposing candidate (Alan Keyes) because they said he couldn’t have won anyway. With the courts taking up future-telling and basing decisions on that, there is no charge that they can’t skirt in similar fashion.

The courts have amazed even me with their putrid sophistry that basically says, “Go F yourself, little people. We can throw out anything we want. You don’t have standing unless we look upon you with favor. So go away, pesky little gnats.”

That’s why it HAS to come down to CRIMINAL charges. Trial by jury. Due process. Standing. All that stuff.

The courts would have us believe this is a political issue. It’s not. The man has forged 2 different birth certificates - and was so aware that the COLB was forged that his people gave the media in their packet of “documents” a copy of the COLB taken from a Snopes page. They didn’t even pretend to have anything genuine to copy from. Given that he claimed in his book to have seen his birth certificate - and given that HI Gov Neil Abercrombie has said that what they have in HI would not convince skeptics that he was born there (IOW, it ISN’T a “clean”, straightforward birth certificate like the forgeries Obama has presented - the BC Obama has used his entire life was NOT from Hawaii. IOW, Obama has known his whole life that he was not born in Hawaii, because he’s been using a birth certificate from someplace else, not having a legally-valid one from Hawaii even to this day.

That means he is clearly guilty of both forgery and perjury. This is not a political issue; it is a criminal issue. Law enforcement are the proper people to deal with this issue. Of course, Fast & Furious has revealed to us just how much integrity democrat-controlled law enforcement has... And everybody else is too busy saying these crimes are either imaginary or don’t matter, to actually do their jobs and enforce the law.


146 posted on 11/01/2011 7:44:58 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

I’m not a birther, but it raises some major red flags that he chose to spend millions obscuring his history.

Why spend millions fighting the lawsuits when the whole issue could have been resolved with $20 and a SASE?

I honestly want to see his travel records and his college transcripts.


147 posted on 11/01/2011 8:09:49 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper ( For those who have had to fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected shall never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1; TigersEye
"This shi* is silly."

Your right this shi* really is silly. In fact, it's down right astounding any conservative...heck, any supporter/upholder of the Constitution doesn't think what's in the white house (both the usurper and the "document" he released) is categorically absurd. I mean, who's buying this thing? Seriously?

 

And, of course, this doesn't even touch on the issue of how in the world someone born with foreign citizenship (& thus allegiance owed to a foreign country) could possibly be considered a "natural born Citizen" and therefore Constitutionally eligible to be the Commander in Chief of the military.

148 posted on 11/01/2011 11:46:42 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

It’s about time! Go git ‘em, Sheriff Joe!


149 posted on 11/02/2011 2:20:54 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama's birth certificate There isn't one.

Well, then let's see the entire microfilm roll containing the Nordyke twins' birth records. ;')

150 posted on 11/02/2011 2:27:51 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson