Skip to comments.
MSNBC Host: Why Should People Have Guns When We Have Cops
Townhall.com ^
| November 1, 2011
| Katie Pavlich
Posted on 11/01/2011 3:27:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
1
posted on
11/01/2011 3:27:56 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Let Mr. Melvin get mugged one time. See if that changes his thinking?
2
posted on
11/01/2011 3:31:21 PM PDT
by
Howie66
(I can see November (2012) from my house.)
To: Kaslin
I just can’t think of a single reason, mein Fuerher...can you?
3
posted on
11/01/2011 3:32:11 PM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Kaslin
Moron! And what happens when the cops enter your house without cause or a warrant??
To: Kaslin
Because I can’t carry a cop.
5
posted on
11/01/2011 3:32:25 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
To: Kaslin
Craig Melvin: one of the liberal castrati.
6
posted on
11/01/2011 3:32:41 PM PDT
by
Noumenon
(The only 'NO' a liberal understands is the one that arrives at muzzle velocity.)
To: Kaslin
> Why Should People Have Guns When We Have Cops
Because the police are just minutes away when seconds count?
What a DOPE.
7
posted on
11/01/2011 3:33:40 PM PDT
by
Westbrook
To: Kaslin
Because when seconds count, the Police are only minutes away, and will be there to take a report.
8
posted on
11/01/2011 3:33:53 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(We need a TEA Party march on GOP headquarters ~!!)
To: cripplecreek
Melvin starts his question on a false premise. Cops are NOT responsible for protecting the public. This question has been settled in a court of law.
9
posted on
11/01/2011 3:36:25 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: Kaslin
Why should people get MSLSD when they have alphabet soup?
10
posted on
11/01/2011 3:37:06 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(The epitome of civility.)
To: Kaslin
11
posted on
11/01/2011 3:37:48 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
('We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them.' -- Mitt Romney)
To: Mr. K
or secure the scene so Coroner can collect your dead, cold, body.
12
posted on
11/01/2011 3:38:43 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: Kaslin
EVERY law abiding person should carry. I don’t care what gender you are. It’s good for men to carry. It’s good for women to carry. Not all guys are buff and good fighters. ANYONE who’s smaller, older, has injuries or disabilities, is alone a lot, has responsibilities for others, are great candidates to carry.
YOU ARE YOUR BEST FIRST RESPONDER. Nobody cares about your life as much as you do. Act like you care about defending it.
13
posted on
11/01/2011 3:39:41 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: Kaslin
I am 30 minutes away from Police protetion at most times.
Here is how it works in a rural community.
We call the cops for a shooting or cutting or domestic dispute. An Officer responds and parks a mile away and waits for backup, that could be coming from 20 miles away.,
He doesnt enter a dangerous situation without backup. Cant say as I blame them for that, but it takes time to get two cops on the scene. Meanwhile the guy that was beating his wife, finish’s beating her and is sitting down drinking a beer when they get there.
Now the most I have seen us have to wait for an officer for an accident is 15 minutes.
Most times around here when a theft call comes in the deputy is warned to be on the lookout for armed citizens in the neighborhood.
14
posted on
11/01/2011 3:39:43 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: cripplecreek
15
posted on
11/01/2011 3:40:28 PM PDT
by
Iron Munro
('We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them.' -- Mitt Romney)
To: Kaslin
Why Should People Have Guns When We Have Cops Because sometimes we have bad cops?
16
posted on
11/01/2011 3:40:49 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: Kaslin
Sheriff, if law enforcement is charged with protecting the public, then, then, then why should that not be sufficient? Why should folks have to go out and get guns and arm themselves if we've got cops?The USSC says that law enforcement has no responsibility to protect you from criminals.
To: Kaslin
“Why Should People Have Guns When We Have Cops”
Why should we have cops when we have guns?
18
posted on
11/01/2011 3:43:06 PM PDT
by
Slambat
(The right to keep and bear arms. Anything one man can carry, drive or pull.)
To: Kaslin
Don't get Mace. Get a firearm.
Get BEAR spray AND a firearm.
19
posted on
11/01/2011 3:45:47 PM PDT
by
JSteff
((((It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and HAVE DOOMED us for a generation or more.))))
To: Westbrook
Liberals aren’t very smart, are they?
20
posted on
11/01/2011 3:45:54 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
