Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rome, Sweet Rome: Could a Single Marine Unit Destroy the Roman Empire?
Popular Mechanics ^ | October 31, 2011 | Alyson Sheppard

Posted on 11/02/2011 8:30:47 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

Rome, Sweet Rome: Could a Single Marine Unit Destroy the Roman Empire?

It was a hypothetical question that became a long online discussion and now a movie in development: Could a small group of heavily armed modern-day Marines take down the Roman Empire at its height? We talked about the debate with James Erwin, the man who scored a movie writing contract based on his online response, and ran the ideas by Roman history expert Adrian Goldsworthy.

James Erwin was browsing reddit.com on his lunch break when a thread piqued his interest. A user called The_Quiet_Earth had posed the question: "Could I destroy the entire Roman Empire during the reign of Augustus if I traveled back in time with a modern U.S. Marine infantry battalion or MEU?"

The question struck a chord with the 37-year-old Erwin, a technical writer from Des Moines, Iowa, who happened to be finishing a book called The Encyclopedia of U.S. Military Actions (Through Facts on File). Erwin tells PM that he wasn’t impressed by other users’ early attempts to answer this question, and so, posting under the username Prufrock451, he came up with his own response. Erwin wrote a 350-word short story chronicling the fictitious 35th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), which suddenly disappears from modern-day Kabul and reappears on the Tiber River in 23 B.C. Erwin posted the piece, finished his meal, and went back to work.

After work, Erwin checked reddit. Thousands of users had read his post and they demanded more. Excited and overwhelmed, Erwin continued submitting pieces of this growing Internet phenomenon. The next day, Los Angeles–based management firm Madhouse Entertainment contacted him about representation. Within the week, after Erwin had put just more than 3500 words to screen, Warner Brothers Studios bought the movie rights.

Erwin’s story, which he titled Rome, Sweet Rome, has a cult following among reddit members, its own subreddit on the site, and has inspired fan music and art. But from the beginning, his posts received comments critiquing the accuracy of his conjured tale. Other redditors commented. Historians commented. Marines commented. "You can definitely tell that the story was something that I dashed out on my lunch hour without doing a lot of research beforehand," says Erwin, an encyclopedia writer and two-time Jeopardy! champ. "Any Marine is going to see mistakes in it, and I’m sure if there were Romans around, they’d say the same thing." He plans on doing intensive technical research during the screenwriting process.

So—disregarding troubling questions about time travel and just why some temporally displaced Marines would feel compelled to destroy an empire——could a single MEU destroy the Roman Empire? To sort through the flood of online responses, PM talked to a Roman military expert and found out how the two sides would line up.

Infantry

An MEU typically contains about 2200 troops, along with their artillery and vehicles. According to Erwin’s original reddit story (which will be altered for the movie), the Marines are transported back in time with what they have with them, including M1 Abrams battle tanks, bulletproof vests, M4 rifles, and grenades.

The year Erwin chose (23 B.C.) falls in the reign of Augustus, great-nephew of Julius Caesar and considered the first Roman emperor. His legions numbered nearly 330,000 men. They wore heavy leather and metal armor, carried swords and javelins, and operated catapults. They would have never heard the sound of an explosion before. "Obviously, there is a massive difference in firepower," says Roman military expert and author Adrian Goldsworthy. "Not only would Roman armor be useless against a rifle round—let alone a grenade launcher or a .50 caliber machine gun—it would probably distort the bullet’s shape and make the wound worse."

In the reddit story, however, Erwin said the Marines would not be resupplied with bullets, batteries, or gasoline from the modern world. "There would be no way of obtaining replacements for these supplies in the ancient world," Goldsworthy says. "An average unit of Marines is not likely to be able to make an oil refinery, start generating electricity, or create machine tools to make spare parts for equipment." And even if they could figure it out, it would take many months or even years. So, as soon as the Marines ran out of gas, their tanks would become little more than hunks of metal.

"In the short term and in the open, modern infantry could massacre any ancient soldiers at little risk to themselves," Goldsworthy says. "But you could not support modern infantry. So all of these weapons and vehicles could make a brief, dramatic, and even devastating appearance, but would very quickly become useless. Probably in a matter of days."

Reinforcements

Erwin’s reddit story stipulates that no more Marines will come back in time, although they may recruit in the ancient world. The Marines would have to; even at their lowest periods, the Roman Empire could conscript hundreds of thousands of soldiers whenever it wanted.

"A Roman centurion would say ‘Let’s take 1000 of these guys. Five hundred of them don’t come back? Get another 500 guys,’" Erwin says. "Americans have never been very good at sending people out as cannon fodder. Marines are better trained and are much harder to replace. No Marine sees himself as a cog, and no Marine is."

Both sides pride themselves on having competent leaders down to the smallest unit level. Goldsworthy says the battle would depend on who had the better officers. Erwin believes it would be shock and awe versus numbers.

"Marines are the best warriors ever trained," he says. "But they can’t fight an endless wave of soldiers. No one can."

Tactics

The Roman legions and Marines are both highly trained with a clear unit structure and hierarchy of command. They emphasize aggression, dominating the opponent, unit cohesion, and being flexible on the ground. "It’s easy to arrange people like chess pieces and march them in a direction," Erwin says. "But when you’ve got basically huge gangs of people going toward each other at knifepoint, it’s very hard to maintain a plan. So they have to improvise."

Romans depended on intimidation to psych out their opponents. They marched in unison and appeared as big and conspicuous as possible, overlapping shields to protect each other from attack. But wearing bright colors and lining up straight isn’t going to do much good against a unit of Marines, who would be best off attacking guerilla-style while the Romans marched.

One advantage for the Marines: a knowledge of military history. The Marines would know from Rome’s history that its legions could be susceptible to ambushes, such as the one that led to their crushing defeat at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. The Marines would have serious disadvantages such as navigation, Goldsworthy says. Besides losing all satellite navigation, their modern maps would be practically useless—everything from the course of rivers to the placement of forests would be different. But, at least in their first encounters with the Marines, the Romans probably wouldn’t know that.

The key for the Marines would be to stay on the move and avoid getting bogged down in one place. If they stood still, Goldsworthy says, the Romans could easily surround them and then take advantage of their huge numbers advantage. The Romans would probably use a variety of nasty siege weapons on the Marines, such as the scorpion, a large crossbow that rapidly fired long bolts. Romans were also known to cut off opponents from water and food supplies, forcing them to surrender or die.

Who Would Win?

Historian Goldsworthy says the MEU would probably lose in the long term—without the ability to resupply their modern weapons, they simply wouldn’t be able to overcome the Roman numbers. However, he says, they could destabilize the Roman Empire, encourage civil war, and initiate regional fracturing. "[The Marines] might discredit the Emperor by defeating the closest army to Rome," he says. "But they would lack the numbers to control Rome itself—with a population of a million or so—let alone the wider empire."

What about in the film? Erwin says he knows the ending, but won’t reveal it anytime soon. He’s currently on leave from his technical writing job to work on the screenplay full-time. A release date for the film version of Rome, Sweet Rome, or what it will be called, is still unknown.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: alternatehistory; bc; beiteversocrumbly; caesar; godsgravesglyphs; marines; meu; militaryhistory; romanempire; romanlegion; rome; romesweetrome; scifi; timetravel; usmc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-177 next last
To: PzLdr

I believe that’s the same one as post 16.


51 posted on 11/02/2011 9:43:09 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
There is an old novella from the 1930s called Lest Darkness Fall that is probably one of the first alternative Roman history science fiction stories. If you're interested in this thread, you would probably be interested in this story. This involves only one individual mysteriously transported back in time. The protagonist of "Lest Darkness Fall" finds himself in Italy during late antiquity after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. Justinian (Emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire) is trying to reconquer and reestablish the Western Roman Empire and the protagonist gets himself involved with the Lombards fighting against the Byzantines. I always thought that this story would make a great movie. However, the time setting would probably have to be changed since few people are familiar with the history after the fall of the Roman Empire. Most of what people know about the Roman Empire is from "Gladiator."
52 posted on 11/02/2011 9:46:32 PM PDT by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

I would love it if that’s the ending, where they are summoned to the imperial court to meet with Octavian himself, and they accept.

Wouldn’t that be a heck of an ending.


53 posted on 11/02/2011 9:47:49 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Only problem is that I think a modern America would find it very difficult to live in the Roman Empire.

The casual brutality, slavery, etc. of the time is quite appalling.


54 posted on 11/02/2011 9:57:59 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Point not addressed. Some modern flues are descended from the flue virus of 1918. There is also the bubonic plague http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2792352/posts and any number of bioweapon possibilities.

How ruthless a campaign do we want?


55 posted on 11/02/2011 9:58:21 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

They wouldn’t have modern filtration methods so solids would quickly clog the fuel injectors.

:)


56 posted on 11/02/2011 9:58:32 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The Marines would have no motive to fight the Romans. They would have a motive to join the Romans and wipe out the Arabs.


57 posted on 11/02/2011 10:05:11 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Good point. Each side would have different germs and anti-bodies.

My bet is that the Romans would have the immunity advantage, since it is their turf and they did not live in modern sanitation.


58 posted on 11/02/2011 10:16:17 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
A few dozen Spanish with muskets and swords defeated 5 0r 20 million Aztecs,

Not exactly. The Aztec client states rebelled and attacked along with the Spanish in an attempt to throw off the Aztec oppression. And there were a lot more of them then there were of the Aztecs.

Of course, later they found out the Spanish were not much better. That is usually the way it goes.

59 posted on 11/02/2011 10:16:53 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

just thinking about the disease/medical angle is interesting. Are soldiers vaccinated against smallpox now? Plus all the other ways of dying of illness that we no longer take for granted but were a normal element of human life forever, up until very recently.

a solar-recharge capability for communications would certainly open some interesting possiblities for the romans once they co-opted the survivors (hopefully).

If they lost, but managed to somehow preclude augustus marrying tiberius’ mother it might have saved his children, as well as germanicus. That single issue (tiberius and his mother) was a major negative in how the roman empire developed. You could argue that germanicus being removed from the rhine left that territory to be allowed to be lost.


60 posted on 11/02/2011 10:31:22 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

their primary weapon was smallpox.


61 posted on 11/02/2011 10:32:04 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Germanicus being removed from the rhine by tiberius may have altered the long-term outcome there. Rome, at the time, seemed to view the loss of varus legion as a setback which they quickly set to making right, hunting down those involved, recovering eagles, etc.


62 posted on 11/02/2011 10:33:45 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 19th LA Inf
I'm still laboring with my second fiction piece, and the "don't-kill-your-grandfather" dilemma forced me to think about alternative universes or time travel..then I got lost.

lol

63 posted on 11/02/2011 10:34:04 PM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JayVee

Ranks of Bronze, about survivors of crassus army. I liked it quite a bit. Birds of Prey was set in roman-era almost as a placeholder. Poul Anderson wrote a great deal in this general time-frame, both from the roman side and stories set in germania during the roman era.


64 posted on 11/02/2011 10:36:31 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

One of my “what-ifs” is if Julius Caesar’s daughter, Julia, had not died birthing Pompey Magnus’ son?

First, the schism between Pompey and Caesar would not have happened and, thus, no “Crossing the Rubicon” Civil War.

Second...can you imagine a rightful heir with the blood of Caesar and Pompey running through his veins?


65 posted on 11/02/2011 10:37:49 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The marines would ultimately prevail, but Titus Pullo would single-handedly take out half of ‘em!


66 posted on 11/02/2011 10:38:10 PM PDT by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimC214

I thought I had read all of anderson’s saga/viking-era stories, but I haven’t seen this one. Buying now!


67 posted on 11/02/2011 10:43:50 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant
They would have a motive to join the Romans and wipe out the Arabs.

That reminds me of another 'what-if?'.

What if Caesar (a friend of the Jews) had not been assassinated and had left for his invasion of Parthia (Iran) and consequently made a province of the Middle East? (He was scheduled to leave two days after the Ides of March)

No Roman sack of Jerusalem and no rise of Islam.....ever.

A man can dream, can't he?

68 posted on 11/02/2011 10:47:08 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: doctor noe

And if there were any female grunts, Titus would conquer them in his inimitable way with his knowledge of their ‘button’.


69 posted on 11/02/2011 10:50:47 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Interesting - I was waiting for someone to bring up the Byzantines. I always wondered what would have happened if Constantine XI had a couple machine guns or even a good sniper with rifle in 1483.

The Turks would have been finished and the M.E. would be a very different place today.


70 posted on 11/02/2011 10:54:08 PM PDT by PGR88 (I'm so open-minded my brains fell out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

The Marines would take olive oil and turn it into bio-diesel. The tanks would continue to operate. Rome would fall in a week....


71 posted on 11/02/2011 11:00:57 PM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

There really aren’t any new ideas in MovieLand are there?


72 posted on 11/02/2011 11:06:23 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

While we are at it, I believe that one could run an Abrams on alcohol. Mileage would suck.


73 posted on 11/02/2011 11:11:52 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; SunkenCiv; KevinDavis

Okay the very sight of the tanks and helicopters would frighten the Romans, let alone the explosions. It would be like they were fighting dragons or something.

Although the Marines won’t be tall compared to the Romans like they would if it were WW2 Japan. The Roman Legions wanted their soldiers to be at least 6ft tall and well built, at least in the early days of the Empire.


74 posted on 11/02/2011 11:15:09 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

Control Rome?

Can you imagine the abject terror of being surrounded by tanks, buildings exploding around you and seeing unknown attack helicopters for the first time sending down its own dragon-like flame on the city?

They’d be begging for terms of surrender.


75 posted on 11/02/2011 11:17:47 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

even their spotlights at night would be frightening to the Romans.


76 posted on 11/02/2011 11:20:52 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
Seeing that it was possible that such weapons could be invented, the Roman power brokers and Caesars would have spared no expense at copying such devices

Good luck with that. They might have forged guns and cannons far earlier at the least though. For much of the technology though, they'd be able to do little more than a cargo cult.

77 posted on 11/02/2011 11:28:31 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I'm reading Claudius, the God (the sequel to Robert Graves initial publication) again.

I just got passed the part where Messalina made the arguement why monopoly was best. I'm facinated by the whole issue of why Claudius failed.

78 posted on 11/02/2011 11:29:11 PM PDT by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

My question. Why would the Marines want to take over the Empire or even fight them? They might come to terms with Agustus—trade a few things for food and wait to reverse anything and return home. They might join the Roman to seize China and crush Germany? It wouldn’t take much—just show them how to make gun powder and crude cannons. An interesting idea.

I thought of one alternative history idea. What if Mexico won the battle of BuenaVista and the Mexican War? California stays with Mexico—they find the gold and become a great power. or

What if a time traveler went back to Germany in 1943 and gave Hitler the history of the war, and ways to improve his V-1s & V-2, Jets and tanks maybe even the A-Bomb! In exchange he ends the Holocaust? Would he do it?


79 posted on 11/02/2011 11:33:46 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Can you imagine watching the Detroit Lions about to win the Super Bowel, and the Emperor decides to thumb down a play on the field?

That means the player at issue has to commit suicide in front of the entire audience - immediately - before the game can commence.

I’m pretty certain that people do NOT understand how far we’ve come...


80 posted on 11/02/2011 11:34:21 PM PDT by raygun (http://bastiat.org/en/the_law DOT html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The endless harems...


81 posted on 11/03/2011 12:03:54 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Curiosity bump...


82 posted on 11/03/2011 12:09:38 AM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

That would make for an amusing ending.

The American Marines storm Rome, kill the emperor declare themselves to be the new leaders

And then die of smallpox infections.

Sounds like an outer limits episode.


83 posted on 11/03/2011 12:09:57 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Unsupplied, no. With supply lines, yes.


84 posted on 11/03/2011 12:30:34 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

If the vehicles run on diesel, you could probably rig them to run on biodiesel. Failing that, you can make ethanol or methanol. I have no idea how long a modern military vehicle could run on that kind of stuff though. They’d probably be better off with old Russian vehicles if they had to try that.


85 posted on 11/03/2011 12:33:35 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Bookmark! Great comments on this thread. :)


86 posted on 11/03/2011 12:47:45 AM PDT by Hetty_Fauxvert (Fuel up the Cain Train! Donate today! - - - https://www.hermancain.com/donate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Not a chance. They would run out of ammo, fuel etc. before they could get that far. In terms of firepower, yes, they could mow down a thousand Roman soldiers, but there would be more, as the article points out.

Also, the Romans were highly disciplined warriors and a small band of powerful warriors didn't destabilize the Empire in 200 BC (Hannibal) when he had a close political alternative, there is no way a modern unit could do the same -- they would be aliens for everyone with no base.

87 posted on 11/03/2011 1:38:14 AM PDT by Cronos (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2787101/posts?page=58#58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Slightly off-topic but I'm a fan of counterfactuals - have been since the ancient days of Usenet and soc.history.what-if. I'm hoping this thread stays around & mutates or else becomes an alternate history ping list. Nothing better than adding the Freeper point of view to historical mash-ups.

Back on topic - a single Marine armed with an unloaded rifle with a fixed bayonet or perhaps just a K-Bar versus a Centurion in full battle gear?

88 posted on 11/03/2011 1:48:00 AM PDT by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Could a Single Marine Unit Destroy the Roman Empire?

Why single? Wouldn't a married Marine be capable of the same amount of carnage?
89 posted on 11/03/2011 2:01:12 AM PDT by Cheburashka (If life hands you lemons, government regulations will prevent you from making lemonade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Found the story here...

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0Bx_wEpbf68sZNjY1OWI2ZTItNjAxMS00MTEwLWI5ZTgtYjk2MzdmNTU5NzJh&hl=en_US

Will read it tomorrow.

Also a lot of discussion here...

http://www.reddit.com/r/RomeSweetRome/

90 posted on 11/03/2011 2:04:32 AM PDT by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; decimon; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...

 GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks GeronL. Seven hills, 28 legions? Or, One Hill. One Marine?

With enough ammo, food, and transportation, a single Marine could have done it. :') Armored formations would mean nothing against automatic weapons.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.


91 posted on 11/03/2011 3:41:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

So all of these weapons and vehicles could make a brief, dramatic, and even devastating appearance, but would very quickly become useless.

The Romans wouldn’t stand a chance if the Marines had “Hollywood Guns”!
(they never run out of ammo)


92 posted on 11/03/2011 4:26:42 AM PDT by Recon Dad ("The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win and cheat if necessary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

BTTT


93 posted on 11/03/2011 4:39:03 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
"1632" by Eric Flint
In April of the year 2000, a six-mile sphere centered on Grantville, West Virginia was displaced in space and time to Germany and May, 1631. The inhabitants of Grantville decided to start the American revolution early; the nobility of Europe were not amused.
http://1632.org/

This story deals with the same issues of how to leverage a modern advantage while adjusting to the limitations of older technologies and dwindling resources.

1632 Series (wikipedia)

94 posted on 11/03/2011 5:02:14 AM PDT by tentmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
"So all of these weapons and vehicles could make a brief, dramatic, and even devastating appearance, but would very quickly become useless."

The thing is, the Romans would have no idea of how they worked, or their limitations. One huge demonstration outside the walls of Rome, destroying some abandoned structures with artillery, slaughtering thousands of sheep, cattle and pigs from the air, and you could bluff them into damn near anything.

I don't think a single human would need to be killed to effect major changes in their society.

Then there is always the God route, openly accept that you were chosen by a single great entity to rise Rome to rule the world but they would have to change their ways first. Admit you're just humans like them, but you were chosen and hand picked because God was upset his son was killed and he was going to give humans one last chance to straiten up or he would destroy the world and start over.

You could install western values in a couple of generations and with the technological advances, hell just accurate maps, you could bring the whole world into a age of enlightenment.

Basically, you become the UN but rule it with an iron fist.

95 posted on 11/03/2011 5:18:19 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

The Spaniards that defeated Montezuma existed at a transitional period of warfare. Muscle powered weapons were slowly giving way to fire-fighting. The Spaniards could continue to fight even when their powder & shot were expended as fire-fighting was a “fair-weather” activity in those days.

Then you have the fact that the Aztecs never saw warhorses or war dogs. Both would have been as terrifying as an Abrams or an LAV, and neither of the latter can live of the land.

Finally we know that the Spainiards made use of native allies. This was the key to their victory. The Marine MEU would have to do the same. I think that would be most difficult as that is a SpecOps function and the Italian city-states mostly remained loyal to Rome during Hannibal’s depredations.


96 posted on 11/03/2011 5:54:26 AM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Yeah, Rome sees this demo and gives up the Empire...The Romans were not barbarians living in huts. They would look to the size of the force test it, when they found how strong it was they'd wait them out and let them expend their resources.

A MEU has enough supplies to sustain itself for a week. In a situation like this they could stretch it out to a month or two on the outside a year. Fuel and ammo are finite.

If I were the MEU CO I'd get on the ships and sail back to America go to Titusville, Pa and drill for oil. With oil all things are possible. Within a few years you're self-sustaining and then go back to Rome.....

97 posted on 11/03/2011 6:00:59 AM PDT by Recon Dad ("The most important rule in a gunfight is: Always win and cheat if necessary.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

The colonel commanding the MEU would have to combine cunning with a level of ruthlessness not seen in Western warfare since the SS were defeated. He would also have to be able to manipulate Roman religion, supersticions, etc. You are after all an alien society that has a greater understanding of your target than they have of you. That is your chief advantage.


98 posted on 11/03/2011 6:05:26 AM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
"they'd wait them out and let them expend their resources."

Not if they think God was going to resupply them. Working on their religions and superstitions is how this battle will get won. If they think God was sending these men then they would follow with God will see them taken care of, the CO would play on that completely. I still think a merger without violence would be possible, allow the emperor and senate to remain in power, just with some changes.

99 posted on 11/03/2011 6:11:23 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Big question: has even one member of the MEU studied Latin or Greek? If so, it could be like our special forces in Afghanistan before the Taliban fell - the Marines could augment one side of the squabbles and their picked winner would be irresistible.

Second question: Bio diesel? If even one member knew how to make it off the top of his head, which is very easy, that would make an even bigger difference. Their armor would eventually break down and run out of ammunition, but they could go quite a few miles first. Planning for those limits would allow them to accomplish quite a bit if they had the extra range from unlimited diesel.

When they collide, my money is on the Marines.

Finally: could they make black powder on their own? It's not the same as their initial loadout, but I'd guess they would have dozens of Marines who are handloaders. Rome would have issues dealing with that, unless a Marine decided to sell that knowledge to the other side (unlikely with the USMC).

Night vision and a modern knife alone would be formidable and would last for a very long time if they conserved their batteries.

100 posted on 11/03/2011 6:13:48 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson