Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Herman Cain flunks foreign policy
Renew America ^ | 11-3-2011 | Alan Caruba - Commentary

Posted on 11/06/2011 11:33:55 AM PST by smoothsailing

November 3, 2011

Herman Cain flunks foreign policy

Alan Caruba

It can be argued that domestic affairs are a president's top priority, but the Constitution expressly puts the chief executive in charge of setting and conducting foreign affairs. It is therefore essential to know if the candidate who wants to be president has a reasonable knowledge of events around the world.

On Tuesday evening I watched an edition of Fox News Bret Beir's Special Report where Herman Cain was "center chair" as the usual members of the panel got a chance to quiz him and, after he attempted to dispose of the charges of sexual harassment unleashed against him, syndicated columnist, Charles Krauthammer asked a question that dealt with foreign policy.

What would Cain do if Iran was going to unleash an attack on the U.S.? Cain gave a rambling, unspecific answer except to say he'd order an Aegis destroyer into the Persian Gulf to let Iran know he was serious, mentioning something about the use by Iran of missiles. It was distressingly clear that Cain had no more idea what he would do than he had regarding other potential foreign policy questions.

Foreign affairs are Herman Cain's Achilles' heel and it has not gone unnoticed by the political press and others. In the October 17 Washington Post, Chris Cillizza took note of Cain's appearance on "Meet the Press" where he was asked "whether Iran's involvement in an alleged plot to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador to the U.S. amounted to an act of war."

Cain replied, "After I looked at all of the information provided by the intelligence community, the military, than I could make that decision." That is what is known as a lawyerly response. "If, if it's an act of war, and the evidence suggests that, than I am going to consult with my advisors and say, 'What are our options"'"

If Barack Obama's extremely muted response is any indication, there aren't that many overt options, though one might hope that there are a host of covert ones in the works.

During a PBS interview with Judy Woodruff, Cain was asked about China as a potential military threat to the U.S. At one point Cain said, "They've indicated that they're trying they're trying to develop nuclear capability..." China conducted its first text of a nuclear device on October 16, 1964. It is estimated to have some 400 nuclear weapons. They are not "developing" a nuclear threat. They are a nuclear threat in the same way as other nations with nuclear weapons. This is why Iran is hell-bent on acquiring its own nuclear weapons.

A man no one could accuse of being anything but conservative, Bill O'Reilly of Fox News, had Cain on his program and, in a segment with Dennis Miller, the show's comic relief, O'Reilly said, "Look, I like Herman Cain. I like his spirit. I think he presents himself very well. But when he came on The Factor a few weeks ago, he had no clue about foreign affairs."

Cain lacks a good poker face. When asked questions for which he is unprepared, his eyes begin to blink like a deranged traffic light. He responds with some programmed answer that is often unrelated to the question. He is the proverbial deer in the headlights.

During a recent speech to a Republican audience, he said that so far as he's concerned, America is Israel's ally and vice versa. That got the predictable applause. Cain visited Israel in August on a fact-finding tour. He met with a deputy prime minister and the Mayor of Jerusalem.

However, when he was interviewed by Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday, he was asked about the Palestinian demand of "right of return," a major divide between Israelis and Palestinians, and Cain had no idea what it was. "That's something that should be negotiated," said Cain, grasping for an answer that sounded sensible, but the issue is not negotiable so far as the Israelis are concerned and with good reason. Someone even casually aware of the issues affecting Israel would know that.

Stephen Yates, president of the DC Advisory and former national security advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney, might not be expected to criticize a GOP candidate, but when asked he said of Cain, "These are the kind of questions a leading candidate cannot simply pass to advisors. To date, Cain has not projected command of these presidential imperatives."

A pizza company executive or one leading a restaurant trade association probably doesn't need to know much about foreign affairs, but a candidate for President of the United States needs to know more than some hasty daily briefings by his campaign staffers.

Cain dismissed the fact he had no idea where Uzbekistan is or its strategic importance to U.S. foreign affairs. "When they ask me who is the president of Ubeki-beki-beki-stan-stan, I'm going to say, you know, I don't know. Do you know?" Even Obama knows that a stable relationship with Uzbekistan is regarded as of vital importance to the war in Afghanistan for its airport and as a transit corridor to reduce dependence on Pakistan.

Cain thinks foreign affairs questions are "gotcha" questions, but they may well be the most critical questions a potential president has to understand and answer. It is testimony to the difficulty of these issues that Barack Obama has essentially carried out most of the policies put in place by George W. Bush when it comes to foreign affairs.

Right now Herman Cain is the candidate-de-jour in the polls, but so was Michelle Bachmann and Rick Perry when he got into the race. I like the fact that Cain is a bona fide conservative. I don't like the obvious fact that he couldn't find Uzbekistan on the map and probably doesn't know much else about the world.

On that count alone, I would not vote for him. Republicans have to get over their current love affair with Herman Cain and select a candidate more qualified to lead the nation.

© Alan Caruba



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boltontotherescue; cain; desperationtime; frontrunner; gnatshit; hopelessattacks; nitpicking; palinization; palintreatement; perryastroturfing; theyhatethisguy; toomuchathreat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2011 11:33:56 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Someone should read more broadly.


2 posted on 11/06/2011 11:37:09 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Another elitist who thinks we need the smartest guy in the room.

Oh wait - we already have him and he wrecked the national standing and alliance of the United States in the process.

Alan Carruba thinks he’s the smartest guy who ever lived.


3 posted on 11/06/2011 11:37:09 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

No pizza for you!


4 posted on 11/06/2011 11:38:22 AM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Interesting read and something that should be considered, but won’t be.

A religious-type fervor has developed on FR lately, the object of the worship being Cain.

No criticism of him can be accepted or even discussed.

I just read, but did not participate in, the Sunday Morning Talk show thread and quite a few people were vowing to write in or not vote if their candidate wasn’t selected.

It’s scary.


5 posted on 11/06/2011 11:41:35 AM PST by altura (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I want an American president who is expert in AMERICAN policy. If he masters that, and deals honestly and firmly with all foreigners,, we will all be better off.

“expertise” in foreign policy is code word for being an insider to the game designed to screw the US taxpayer and patriot in the name of globalism. If you ALWAYS put America first,,to them this shows you aren’t properly versed in foreign policy.

Foreign policy is simple if you always put America first, and act honestly. Every nation, friend and foe should expect that all theur dealings with us a conducted in the sanitizing daylight, that nobody is being cheated, and will be free of the fraud and intrigue that Europe specializes in.


6 posted on 11/06/2011 11:42:45 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
What would Cain do if Iran was going to unleash an attack on the U.S.? Cain gave a rambling, unspecific answer except to say he'd order an Aegis destroyer into the Persian Gulf to let Iran know he was serious, mentioning something about the use by Iran of missiles. It was distressingly clear that Cain had no more idea what he would do than he had regarding other potential foreign policy questions.

I'm not being a wisenheimer, but who has articulated a defined policy on Iran? When the question comes up all the candidates say we should be strong and clear, and then they mumble stuff about sanctions and supporting Israel and "the international community."

7 posted on 11/06/2011 11:42:49 AM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

First of all, the part about China is blatantly untrue.

From a a commentary written in 2005 about China -

http://www.economicfreedomcoalition.com/news/press-opinion-120305.asp

“The U.S. should be less concerned about China’s economic potential than by the military threat it poses. Three Chinese spies were recently indicted in the U.S. for conspiring to steal numerous naval warship technologies. This summer China and Russia participated in a week-long joint military exercise. China’s build up of nuclear, military and space technologies to rival the U.S., and its saber-rattling over Taiwan’s independence, signals a commitment to more red, not green. “

___________

Cain’s Foreign Policy Team
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/10/26/raising_cain_inside_herman_cain_s_new_foreign_policy_team#.TqhMZVVMvei.facebook

Cain discusses foreign policy in interviews:

with Dick Morris - http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/herman-cain-interview-on-new-ideas-to-tame-iran-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/

with Bill O’Reilly:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJjAJeyYhAg

Cain’s Position on Israel: http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/28/the-u-s-must-stand-with-israel/

Summary of Foreign Policy Stance:
http://www.hermancain.com/the-issues

Values Voters Speech:
http://www.therightscoop.com/herman-cain-brings-the-house-down-at-values-voter-summit/


8 posted on 11/06/2011 11:43:05 AM PST by justsaynomore (Pray for Herman Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Mr. Cain said, before making a decision, he'd consults the Generals. That's good enough for me.
9 posted on 11/06/2011 11:43:25 AM PST by Realman30 ("I've already made a donation to Haiti. It's called taxes". . . . El Rushbo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura
It’s scary.

Unbunch your panties. Happens every election.

10 posted on 11/06/2011 11:43:54 AM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

bumping just the entertainment value


11 posted on 11/06/2011 11:44:00 AM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
A man no one could accuse of being anything but conservative, Bill O'Reilly of Fox News,

Caruba = Fail

12 posted on 11/06/2011 11:44:10 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura

I’m not saying foreign policy isn’t important. But Obama had no foreign policy experience either when he ran for President. No one is born with it. I’m sure a new President will have good people to advise him. I don’t see what’s the big deal about it.


13 posted on 11/06/2011 11:44:39 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Yep.


14 posted on 11/06/2011 11:45:16 AM PST by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Isn’t that why a President has advisors that are knowledgeable in the things that he is not knowledgeable in.

No one knows everything about everything. I would prefer a President that admits that he doesn’t know something than one that falsely claims that he does.

That is one of the problems with Mr. o. He doesn’t have any advisors that know any more than he does.


15 posted on 11/06/2011 11:45:47 AM PST by Crazy ole coot (Mr. obama (the squatter in the White House) are you a Natural Born Citizen?? Prove it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Pssst...he’s not that knowledgeable on domestic policy either.


16 posted on 11/06/2011 11:45:50 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
A man no one could accuse of being anything but conservative, Bill O'Reilly

Well, I don't know about that...

17 posted on 11/06/2011 11:46:09 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Looking all around, digging under chair, looking in closet, now in basement, looking out in yard, in the freezer. Just out of luck, cannot find one I give a damn. I am just a little bit more than tired of spending zillions and getting real americans killed over some silly ass thing called foreign policy which has turned into little more than welfare and black mail. And a bunch of useless, as tits on a bore hog, bottom feeders in the united nations.
18 posted on 11/06/2011 11:46:39 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Another idiot who is lying about what Herman Cain - an EXPECT on nuclear weapons and ballistic delivery capabilities - said about China. "RenewAmerica" joins HotAir.com in the RomneyBot traitor category.
19 posted on 11/06/2011 11:46:50 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Cain lacks a good poker face. When asked questions for which he is unprepared, his eyes begin to blink like a deranged traffic light. He responds with some programmed answer that is often unrelated to the question. He is the proverbial deer in the headlights

Maybe he means Perry. I've never noticed what he described with Cain. Cain answers directly and if he doesn't know something he is refreshingly honest about it. So this is an out and out lie and it's actually irrelevant in this post-Obama era where we have a President that is still clueless on foreign policy after 3 years on the job.

20 posted on 11/06/2011 11:47:03 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

Bill O’Reilly is no conservative.

Now we’re hearing conservatives being told Cain is deficient in foreign policy.

The Left failed to derail him with a phony scandal so now its trying another line of attack.

They and the GOP establishment are getting desperate.


21 posted on 11/06/2011 11:47:32 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It is not mastery of facts that make a leader, it’s mastery of principle.

Many an idiot-savant has mastered “facts” as such. They don’t do much more than show off.

Someone grounded in principles can get any number of experts to lay out facts. The set of principles put them together in a meaningful way.


22 posted on 11/06/2011 11:48:53 AM PST by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

John McCain knows more about foregin affairs than any of the Republican candidates in 2008 or 2012. If you think his ass belongs anywhere near the presidency you’re nuts.


23 posted on 11/06/2011 11:49:10 AM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Sarah Palin, the only cure for the RINO virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

"Dr.Kissinger have you ever heard of Alan Caruba?"

"Yes, he's a moron."

24 posted on 11/06/2011 11:49:25 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

What is the capital of Assyria?


25 posted on 11/06/2011 11:50:02 AM PST by mdittmar (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altura

I am beginning to think that Perrywinkes define “religious like fervor” - as anyone who isn’t particularly enthused by being called “heartless” by a RINO.

Just saying.

Perrywinkes, used to regularly say the exact same think about Palin supporters. That we “went on Perry threads to disrupt”. Etc.

Word for word. The talking points remain on the same fax, only the candidate name is changed.

So did all the Palin supporters change religions?

Or are they simply realizing there is someone else on the scene, who believes as they do?

Now. Here we are on a Cain thread. A Cain thread.

Just saying.

Who is disrupting?


26 posted on 11/06/2011 11:50:16 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

No one seems to recall the famous commercial Hillary ran about Obama being unprepared for that 3:00 AM crisis phone call.

The voters discounted it and thought Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience wasn’t relevant to his being President.

Now a different, higher standard is applied to Cain. How convenient.


27 posted on 11/06/2011 11:51:06 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Exactly. Pinheads can go read a book. You want a man of action that supports the value of hard work. The Constitution supports this and the right to pray and worship about it. It also supports your right to defend it. The over-educated numbnuts we have in charge now just expects it.


28 posted on 11/06/2011 11:51:16 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I tend to agree with you.


29 posted on 11/06/2011 11:51:43 AM PST by Running On Empty (The three sorriest words: "It's too late")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I think a candidate for President should have a well-articulated set of priniciples for dealing with foreign policy and concrete proposals for advancing them re the major challenges on the world scene. When the USSR was the foremost of those challenges in the 1980’s, Ronald Reagan had a well-thought out philosophy regarding how to deal with the communists: “We win, they lose.” And he had a program, both overt and covert, for making that happen.

We should now have the same attitude regarding radical jihadism, led by Iran openly and by the likes of Saudi Arabia covertly. A new President, explicitly unlike Obama, should have a program ready to go to frustrate and defeat this enemy. They don’t have to reveal every detail of it - they shouldn’t, in fact - but they should let us know they have one ready. or so it seems to me.


30 posted on 11/06/2011 11:52:57 AM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Speed dial, superwoman kicks down door, end of problem, http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condoleezza_Rice
31 posted on 11/06/2011 11:53:55 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow demorats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr7zhnctF4c


32 posted on 11/06/2011 11:54:25 AM PST by tumblindice (The 2nd should be 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

It’s not like this is the first time someone has questioned his prowess on foreign policy.


33 posted on 11/06/2011 11:55:07 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Maybe Cain can hire an international affairs expert like Kissinger or Bolton and ask them to write his positions for him. Then he can read them back verbatim just like Perry did with Forbes’ flat tax plan.


34 posted on 11/06/2011 11:56:21 AM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Sarah Palin, the only cure for the RINO virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

I had the same concern about candidate Reagan....


35 posted on 11/06/2011 11:56:29 AM PST by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

What do you want him to say?


36 posted on 11/06/2011 11:56:54 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mylife

How are all the foreign policy “experts” currently destroying America’s future, working out for you?...


37 posted on 11/06/2011 11:57:16 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Mr. Reagan was in a much different position. He put a big scare into the 1976 convention.


38 posted on 11/06/2011 11:59:07 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: altura
A religious-type fervor has developed on FR lately, the object of the worship being Cain.

Concern trolls like you love to paint the motivation of the other side as something cultish. Trust me, I've seen plenty of that on the Perry side as well, running around foolishly claiming that Perry is the only one who can beat Romney. Well, guess what? Cain has doubled Romney in the most recent Iowa poll and has FIVE TIMES the support of Perry.

No criticism of him can be accepted or even discussed.

And another thing the concern trolls like to do is to pretend that they can't criticize a candidate. And that is pure horsecrap and you know it. You just don't like the retorts that get properly thrown right back in your face when you try to push liberal hatchet jobs against Cain.

Try this - working on your candidate to undo some of the positions that sunk him into single digits, instead of bashing the guy who is actually putting a hurt on Romney.

39 posted on 11/06/2011 12:00:02 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

I never did. Reagan had been making his position clear for years.


40 posted on 11/06/2011 12:01:33 PM PST by smoothsailing (FUMR-FUBO- the left is a seething mass neurosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Not only that but Cain has been a CEO and ran things. Obama had never run anything except his mouth before he was President.


41 posted on 11/06/2011 12:02:22 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Right now it would be very hard to be on top of foreign policy. It is probably more fluid than ever.


42 posted on 11/06/2011 12:03:05 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

They aren’t.
I think Obama is a damn fool for giving up a military position in Iraq.
I think he has set up Afghanistan in such a way as to get more of our soldiers killed
I think Obama has encouraged Iran and Syria.
He has undermined long time allies in the ME and set it on fire.


43 posted on 11/06/2011 12:03:25 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

As long as Cain or any president has the right advisors and listens to the military leadership, that is sufficient. Cain is an excellent decision maker.

Neither Reagan, Clinton, bush43 nor obama has any previous experience other than advisors briefing them.


44 posted on 11/06/2011 12:03:46 PM PST by ilgipper (Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Well when the author of the article cannot even get the question Cain was asked right, there really is no reason to waste any time responding to his hyper hysteric ignorance

Here is a clue. The reason certain candidates are polling in single digits is GOP voters are interested in solutions and idea from their candidates not these sort of childish personal attacks.

45 posted on 11/06/2011 12:03:55 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

It’s a fun part of politics if the time affords you. Sometimes I struggle and don’t get to play.


46 posted on 11/06/2011 12:06:04 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

All I have said here is that Bill O’Rielly is not a conservative, and that this is not the first time anyone has questioned Cain foreign policy knowledge.


47 posted on 11/06/2011 12:06:41 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: plangent
Personally,

I would rather have a president that thinks on it for a while, considers all options, then makes decisions that are in the interests of the USA as first priority.

Coming up with an answer in 20-30 seconds might look good at a liberal media staged event, but really does not say much for the candidate's deep reasoning abilities.

48 posted on 11/06/2011 12:06:43 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: greatvikingone
I wonder how many foreign policy geniuses it took to get us into a ground war in Afghanistan less than two decades after the USSR showed us what a stupid, stupid move that was? Probably the same crowd that thought “Let's train a bunch of militant Muslims how to fight guerrilla wars against a superpower.”

I am not sold on the value of genius or expertise. I do appreciate good sense, judgment, and a willingness to not just react for the sake of reacting and/or having an opinion.

49 posted on 11/06/2011 12:07:00 PM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Having a position, is much different than having foreign policy experience.

Aside from having learned a few things myself, over the last 32 years, my point was Cain’s character will lead him to good foreign policy positions, just as Obama’s lacking has determined his poor foreign policy positions.


50 posted on 11/06/2011 12:08:29 PM PST by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson