I then found this story listed on Google that shows the Cain accuser with the middle initial L.
Funny thing is if you go the actually story here: HERE you see no mention of her middle initial. hmmm. Looking for more info on this.
Posted on 11/07/2011 10:55:06 AM PST by reegs
For those interested in watching the press conference live.
She's allegedly 4 -- but since none of the alleged first 3 were ever identified, I guess she could be any or all of them.
Didn't see your post before I posted basically the same question!
Funny thing is if you go the actually story here: HERE you see no mention of her middle initial. hmmm. Looking for more info on this.
Thank you! Anyone can make a claim against anyone. Every GOP candidate is going to get this treatment. Are we only going to defend the candidate with the "slickest" PR team?
I don’t give a damn about consensual sex (as long as it is with an adult of the opposite sex).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So. Herman Cain could feasibly have 25-50 affairs and as long as they were consenusal and with an adult of the opposite sex, you are OK with him running as a conservative.
Got it. Thanks for that input. I always am so interested in what liberals think.
Unimportant?
My God has our school system utterly failed our nation.
Look, you want to run for the White House.. you, if you aren’t a complete fool, know your life will get picked over, so the first thing you do is go do your own “opposition research” against yourself. You find your employer paid a woman who alledged you harrassed her a sizeable sum of money to shut up... and you think that’s “UNIMPORTANT”??
If you think that, you are proving that you are even more unfit to sit in the White House than I originally alledged.
If you did do your due dilligence, you would know that this item is out there and that its likely going to come up and you better have an answer for it. Cain’s was a deer in headlights for 2-3 days, then lashing out at another Republican without proof only to backstep and now to try to poke jokes over Twitter.
Unimportant?? Please, we already have a bozo in the white house who is unfit and not baked, I sure don’t see any reason to send another one. Anyone who wants this job should know damned well his life is going to be picked clean, and for him to be blindsided by this doesn’t show he didn’t think it wasn’t important, it shows he didn’t do his due dilligence, and his reactions to it have been sadly Obamaesque... all over the map for a few days, then blame someone else, and then finally try to turn it into a joke.
I’ve had my fill of those sorts, just because this ones got an R beside his name doesn’t mean he’s any more prepared for the job... and clearly he isn’t.
Why would you bring Newt Gingrich into a discussion of how the establishment is trying to lynch Herman Cain?
Unless you believe Newt Gingrich is a party to that lynching.
Or unless you believe it’s not a lynching, that the establishment is justified in putting a noose around Herman Cain’s neck, and that the only appropriate response in that case is to deflect public attention to “some other bad guy”?
So which is it?
Are you trying to deflect attention to “some other bad guy” or do you believe that Newt is in cahoots with the lynch mob?
And remember, it was YOU who brought New Gingrich into a discussion involving the attempted lynching of Herman Cain, not ME.
Just please remember that.
So you *admit* you've done this in the past.
I should go to work for Politico . . .
I agree it happens everyday. I’m telling you as a married businessman - its incredibly dumb and shows poor judgement.
http://consumer.public-record.com/results.asp
More than one result for Sharon Bialek in Chicago, bankruptcies, tax liens, ....
If it’s the same woman....
think someone wants some MONEY??? $$$
******************
I hope you took a screenshot of these results because the come back with “no results” for me. Evil works fast.
perhaps he expected her to do the zipper work? I wouldn’t say that’s a disqualifying part of this attempted adultery case.
Not saying I believe her, it seems like bs to me.
You are witnessing the Cain being Palin’d, IN REAL TIME. The truth doesn’t matter, just the meme.You are right. I was wrong to forget the lies they told about Sarah. This is just a continuation of that, as you suggest.
My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out.
criminal record search would be good too... why is this woman at home with her kids (single mother), and who is she being paid by?
Not to mention she stayed silent all of last week while this story made the rounds. She waited until Monday (for maximum political effect) to announce her allegations, just like Politico did a week ago.
Sounds like she may have gone on to advanced studies from there.
Sheesh. Forget Newt, already!! We need to be circling the wagons and telling the media and public, “NOT AGAIN! NOT *EVER* AGAIN!!”
Bringing up everyone else’s dirty laundry is just a circular firing squad.
With all the stimulus money Obama and the Dems have stashed away, they will indeed have women pouring in from all angles.
Ultimately, Obama is going to destroy any opposition by whatever means necessary. Ergo, the Right had better prepare for all-out war.
So today's charade was opened up with a lie. Nice. Yet they expect us to believe the rest of it? I don't think so.
Yeah, no wonder Holder wants FOIA changed.
So many kids lost their innocence because of the details of Bill Clinton's actual assault of an intern in the papers and on TV. Oral sex, semen stains, phallic cigars - it was awful.
My 11 year old daughter has become a fan of Herman Cain because she pays attention and knows that I like him. She wanted me to explain to her what people were saying about him on the news this morning.
I saw a little more of her innocence fade away. She was already heartbroken by all of the terrible attacks on her hero Sarah Palin.
The copy/paste up-thread indicates that her voter registration is inactive. If so, she's not a registered anything.
Sorry, but you declaring it bunk doesn’t make it so. You don’t want to believe her, and that’s fine, but proving she is lying is not simply you saying so.
Cain has completely mishandled this situation from the get go if all of this is nothing more than bogus bs.
So far, its a he said she said, and its a he said/she said in the context of a guy who’s had payments go out to at least one woman to keep her quiet... That doesn’t look good, and the so called “air tight” declarations of bunk by you and others don’t remotely ring true.
If this is a witch hunt, it will hopefully be shown to be quickly, but the so called proof and declarations so far on this thread are woefully inadequate for even fellow conservatives, they sure aren’t going to be for the general electorate.
No degree?
Accoding to Michelle Malkin it’s a different dude.
She said that she had a brief conversation recently with him where she asked him if he remembered her, to which he replied that he did.
Is that the truth? Does he know her?
Great find!!! Bump!
If it is true you shouldn’t have to read it. It should just be natural. When a statement is read it is not believable!
2009-M5-000279 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 02/13/2009
2008-M6-003386 DAVIS WAYMON & CLA HARROLD ROGUAYYAH 07/30/2008
2008-M5-001007 STERLING ESTATES HARTLEY GORDON 06/05/2008
2006-M1-176955 MRC RECEIVABLES CO HARTLEY SHARON 10/02/2006
2006-M5-001770 STERLING ESTATES HARTLEY GORDON W 09/25/2006
2006-M1-167313 CAPITAL ONE BANK HARTLEY SHARON R 09/01/2006
2005-M1-172026 ASSET ACCEPTANCE HARTLEY SHARON 10/13/2005
2005-M5-000835 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 05/05/2005
2004-M1-175144 ASSET ACCEPTANCE HARTLEY SHARON 11/09/2004
2004-M5-000302 STERLING ESTATES L HARTLEY GORDON 02/18/2004
2002-M1-147913 UNIFUND CCR PARTNE HARTLEY SHARON 08/09/2002
1994-M1-171427 WELLINGTON KENNETH HARTLEY SHARON 12/05/1994
1994-M2-001454 WILMETTE REAL EST HARTLEY JAMES 05/18/1994
1994-M1-712527 WELLINGTON ARMS AP HARTLEY SHARON 05/03/1994
Sharon Hartley (alias?)
“I thought she looked like a fairly fat woman. High mileage, her best days are behind her. Scrap heap tramp.”
She reminds me of the countess character played by Jennifer Coolidge in the movie Best in Show.
Let me ask you this, why do you think you need to be a party to what goes on in the bedroom between two consenting adults?
Too bad you aren’t using the same energy to vet Cain. Just sayin’
Hello Teddymittlover, I wondered when you would show up. What’s the game plan from Mittens today? Has the home office sent you their talking points yet? Or are you just going to wing it by insinuating this whole lie is somehow true? So like your master rat Willard. Perhaps you’re going to claim you support Perry and Cain again? What’s one more lie amongst the multitude?
I thought thought the very same thing when I read “stimulus package”. Did she really use that phrase? It definitely was not in use 15 years ago. These are the sorts of “tells” that I like to look for when confronted with a possible LIAR.
Child Parentage Case
I’d love to follow the money in all this. I’d bet my mortgage it twists and turns all the way back to that slimy bastard Soros.
..she didn’t know where the headquarter’s were?
According to her story she worked for the NRA in Chicago and was in DC to meet Cain. She didn’t work at the DC offices. Or that’s the way I understood her story.
MRC Receivables looks like a debt collector too.
I believe it. Some socialist hate conservatives so much they will do anything to get a RINO in office over a conservative.
married name sharon hartley? https://w3.courtlink.lexisnexis.com/cookcounty/FindDock.asp?NCase=&SearchType=2&Database=4&case_no=&Year=&div=&caseno=&PLtype=1&sname=Sharon+Hartley&CDate=
anyone wanna talk to her husband? lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.