Skip to comments.Who is Cain accuser Sharon Bialek?
Posted on 11/07/2011 4:20:54 PM PST by STARWISE
The public record on Bialek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time while living in Des Plaines.
Between 1993 and 1996 Bialek worked for four different companies in promotion and marketing positions.
In 1996, and part of 1997, Bialek was at the National Restaurant Association. After being let go from that job in mid-1997, she says that she went to Washington, D.C., to meet with Cain, president of the association, because she needed a job.
In 1999, Bialek's son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive. In 2001 came Bialek's second personal bankruptcy, filed after sizable legal bills. That year she was hired by WGN radio where she worked until 2004 when she took a marketing job and then a job at WCKG radio.
(news video at link)
(Excerpt) Read more at abclocal.go.com ...
Ugh! I didn’t think my opinion of marketing people couldn’t sink any lower. My apologies to FR marketing people who aren’t ditzy, skanky social climbers.
Here’s what I believe: Any idiot who kneejerkedly takes a position directly contrary to what they think the media is saying is just as much a prisoner of the media’s mind-wash as the most goosestepping liberal.
If you always take a position contrary to what Mr. Media says — if Mr. Media says x, so you decide “anti-x” — then Mr. Media still controls your brain. Because by saying x they dictate you will, without a moment’s thought, brainlessly parrot back “anti-x!”
Whether Herman Cain is innocent or guilty of what he is alleged to have done is wholly independent of whether the media “wants” him to be guilty.
Yes, of course they want him to be guilty. But that doesn’t men we don’t look at things with logic.
Laz would hit it. After a raft of precoitus paperwork....
And what exactly does that mean?
They established that she's the father.
No, but I have been investigated by many so I know the questions they ask. (Actually I probably have just watched too many Law and Order episodes).
I believe that she did try to get Herman’s help in getting a job back in 1997- but that she came on all flirty and he put the brakes on it.
I also believe this plot to profit was hatched as soon as Herman Cain announced his campaign and that she may have confronted him at the TEA Party gathering....like a groupie with a grudge.
“Hell hath no fury”.
Look, the skank works out of Chicago. ‘Nuf said.
If she was about 10 years younger and 50 pounds heavier, she could mass for Meghan McCain. And, it appears Sharon is following Miss Piggy’s “path to success.”
In the poker world we call this getting caught trying to steal a cookie.
This skank is exactly what’s wrong with America.
They know what they are doing. Problem is, it will explode in their faces.
I want a statement out of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton regarding this high tech lynching, that is all this is. The Democrats and RINOS truly are the new Ku Klux Klan.
Wait a moment.
Boyfriend makes the hotel reservations. She says Cain upgraded her to a luxury suite. How did Cain know where she was staying and what kind of room she had?
Somethin here doesn’t compute.
In fact, a lot of this doesn’t compute. After a genital grab and a crotch dunk, why didn’t she get out of the car? why not a criminal complaint?
Man, I’d love to get her on a lie detector. And Gloria, too.
That was supposed to be a question: It’s not clear if she was ever married to the boy’s father - was he already married?
When it has that liberal witch, allred connected to it, you are damn right, joe was and is his own man, you are comparing apples to oranges.
People with NO money, ( like bankrupts) rarely if ever donate to politcal campaigns..
Looks like it was make a deal time....
Look at the name of the att’y who sued her per the document link posted above.... AXELROD, DAVID Any relation to a White House insider?
Sorry folks, I see Flip Flopney’s hands all over this one.
As they were discussing this tonight on “Special Report with Bret Baier”, two things were said that caused me to pause and go “hmmmmm”.
1) It was revealed that Flip Flopney is spending ALL his radio and TV ad money in Iowa against Perry, and Perry only. Perry is way down, and Herman is tied with Flip in the polls. That makes no sense unless Flip knows something that causes him no worry of Cain.
2) Flip Flopney has declined the Fox invitation for a “center Seat” appearance on Fox. I guess Flip figures the fix is in for him and he doesn’t need the exposure. “Center Seat” has featured many, if not all of the other Pub candidates, either in the past or scheduled for the near future. Flip said no.
This smells to high heaven, and I have a sneaky suspicion the smell ain’t wafting over from Chicago-way.
But would Laz hit it? (g)
And all the credible women they dragged through the mud after Clinton raped and otherwise molested them. The Juanita Broderick rape alone should have been enough to send Clinton to prison for a long, long time
Of interest PING!!!
I’m not buying it at this point. The first 3 seemed pretty bogus and the timing/company this woman is keeping is a telltale. I think this will be proven to be a fake in a couple of months at most. This reminds me of something similar Nikki Haley went through during her campaign.
yea, saw it. . what's up with that?
David Axelrod is the prosecuting attorney??? Really?
"She's of the same political persuasion as Herman Cain," Harwood said. "There was no money on the table to go and have an interview. This is truly about an American girl who's got a big heart and wants to do the right thing."
Yeah, right! LOL!
And SHE was sued previously in a paternity case by the FATHER of her child? Apparently HE didn't trust her either.
4 jobs in 4 years? During the mid 90's? The boom years? And TWO bankruptcies 8 years apart? Now that's a strange situation.
Whaa? I live 15-20 minutes away from Mundelein, IL. This is getting scary. Time for some private investigation possibly?
Wow. The devil is in the details.
Wow. The devil is in the details.
Not that Axelrod.
Looks like 2 hookers to me. Just sayin’. Both slightly over the age to be first team and both desperate for $$.
Oops, didn’t pick up that Axelrod was on the other side. And her bankruptcies were 10 years apart, not 8. My mistake.
Even doing a name search without any other criteria comes up with nothing.
The doc you saw was a financial judgement against her. It wasn’t that David Axelrod and he wasn’t her attorney, he was the attorney for the lending company who was suing her. She doesn’t have an attorney listed on that doc.
(she also had a summary judgment against her and just this past September, had an asset seizure order against her..)
“According to the FEC, shes a person who has never donated to a Republic candidate or organization.”
And what Republican would have Gloria represent them?
For someone who has held so many communication/ marketing type positions, it seems odd that she reads from notes typed on copy paper stapled together, so that they must be flipped over in an awkward manner.
Same City... However...
No, David Axelrod is not connected to Sharon Bialek; plus Cook County court records
By Michelle Malkin November 7, 2011 03:54 PM
And you believe that why? Cain didn't say that, in fact Cain is only attacking the media and not disputing much in the way of specific details at all. So you're just throwing guesses out there with absolutely zilch to back it up.
This woman went on national TV and accused Herman Cain, a married man and successful business person, of trying to have sex with her in exchange for his help with getting her a job. Her claims are very specific and if true, it demonstrates that at minimum Cain isn't very concerned about his wedding vows. Now why exactly can't Cain specifically reject her charges. If none of this happened, why can't Cain go on TV and specifically address these accusations. I know I sure as heck would. I don't know anyone who has been faithful to their wife and was a good upstanding person who wouldn't be outraged enough to very publicly denounce the specifics of what this woman claims. Yet Cain is not doing that at all, instead he is launching into an attack on the media - which looks to me like he is trying to change the subject.
Here is part of Cain's denial statement:
Its easy to make accusations when, by virtue of your anonymity, you dont have to be held accountable for the claims youre making,
Yet this new woman isn't anonymous at all. She CAN be held accountable. If it is all BS, Cain shouldn't have much trouble making that point. Was he with her that night? Did he upgrade her hotel room? These are things he should know, and if there is nothing to her story he could squash her like a bug and win such a PR coup that all the other charges would likely be dismissed by the public as well. But Cain isn't doing that, he is trying to change the subject.
I have no idea if this is true, the accusations are probably overblown. But I remember when we got all the allegations against Arnold when he was running in the recall election. Women were coming out of the woodwork claiming he was a serial groper and sex hound. I remember conservatives dismissed the charges as media lies. Now it turns out those weren't lies at all - worse, Arnold even knocked up his freaking maid and has a kid with her. Cain's defense here is weak and he will have to do a lot better.
Different David Axelrod. That’s been determined early on...
Is that a herpe on her lip?