Skip to comments.Voice analysis: Cain truthful, Bialek ‘inaccurate’ [VIDEO]
Posted on 11/10/2011 9:44:27 AM PST by NoLibZone
Wednesday night on Atlanta CBS affiliate WGCL-TV, reporter Mike Paluska interviewed private investigator T.J. Ward, who uses computer software to determine with a high degree of certainty whether someone is telling the truth.
The software works by analyzing your voice, from emotional stress to your thought process, Paluska said.
Two samples were played for the software, said to cost $15,000: one of GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain from his Phoenix press conference on Tuesday, and the other of his accuser Sharon Bialek from her Monday press conference in New York City.
The report showed a low risk of untruthfulness for Cain, while showing subject not sure, high stress, high risk statement and inaccuracy for Bialek.
In my exam taken from his speech, [Cain] is being truthful about not having any knowledge about these allegations brought against him, Ward said.
You don’t think this means Bialek is lying or anything? (sarc)
You won’t be here long.
I emailed it to Matt Drudge late last night.
The $50.00 question is why has he not yet decided to post it...
I can only speculate as to why not, but I’m giving him one more day before I fire off a nasty email to him.
LOL! You and I think alike; I, too, was just about to tell her about that spell checker!
P.S. - RE: “Help full” — Good one!
I could have sworn it was up on Drudge for a little bit this afternoon, but now it’s down again.
I sent it to him, again.
I did too. It was actually on Drudge today for several hours! I don’t know why he took it down but was pretty excited to see it there while it lasted.
Yep, it was. I wonder why it’s gone now.
Whew! Glad you let me know about it before I fired off that nasty email I was drafting to Matt!
Fire it off anyway! As I said, he took the article down!
Please, lets get real, those women came forward to show how serious they are about exposing an alledged sexual preditor. Refering to all the men who hold high positions, a show of hands of how many of you are guilty of the same thing as Cain? Stand up and Man up.
You signed up today to post this pile of dog manure???
Go back to DU.
Karen Kraushaar complained 2x now - so let’s see? Everywhere she’s hired they harass her in some way? Why would that be?
It is FAR too easy to file sexual harassment claims when one works for the federal government.
Someone at my husband’s work place that he supervised filed one against him because 4 guys were taking a break after having moved an office full of furniture and reset most of it. When told it was time to return to work and finish the job one of the guys said to the other guys working “come on ladies, time to get back to work.”
This was filed and investigated because he “ALLOWED” this guy to make that comment, just as if he’d put his hand on someone’s a$$. Then he was forced to go to a sexual harassment course. When he agreed to go so this would end but suggested that ALL his employees go so that EVERYONE would know just what is and what isn’t sexual harassment he was told “you are the one with the problem”.
I think the woman that reported that stupid comment has the problem, but now it’s on my husband’s record.
That's sexual harassment right there!
He already has, one L. Lin Wood, who has a reputation of his own, concerning defamation of character suits (he specializes in them). Not somebody who Allred, who usually tries her cases "in the court of public opinion", wants go go toe to toe with in a bona-fide courtroom...
I was attempting to make a vague reference to Baileys 1983 TV show, Lie Detector, but was too vague. My lame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.