Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survivors of sexual abuse appalled by Penn State unrest
CNN ^ | 11 Nov 2011 | Madison Park

Posted on 11/11/2011 6:47:52 PM PST by Hoodat

How does a survivor of sexual abuse respond to students rioting at Penn State?

"You're not getting it. You just don't get it," said Dave Lorenz who was abused by a priest as a teen.

"It's just stupid youthfulness."

Earlier this week, legendary head football coach Joe Paterno was removed in the midst of a scandal involving sexual abuse allegations against a former defensive coordinator, Jerry Sandusky.

-snip-

Watching footage of Penn State students rioting in the streets Wednesday night, Lorenzo shuddered, then hung his head.

What bothered Lorenz is that students "rallied around (Paterno's) house, cheering him up."

"The kids up there just don't understand what this does," he said.

"Stop thinking of the adult and start thinking of what happens to a child that goes through this. You love the adult, you may not know the kid. Start thinking of the kid and the horror they go through, because it's hell."

-snip-

Kayla Garriott, a 22-year-old college student who was sexually abused as a child, said the open support for Paterno was disrespectful to survivors.

"That's the first thing people look at -- that their football team is without their head coach that's been there so many years. Nobody looks at the eight children."

The rioters are "never going to be in those children's shoes. It's not about football. It's about eight children who are never going to get back their lives back. They're going to live with this the rest of their lives. They might not get over that."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: childabuse; clintonlegacy; jerrysandusky; joepaterno; paterno; pennstate; pennsylvania; sandusky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-271 next last
To: Elsie

One word: “Google.” :;
Seriously though. It is not hard to find.


181 posted on 11/12/2011 7:20:02 AM PST by Treeless Branch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

“If you haven’t looked at FREEPER NewinTexsas’ list of who had prior knowledge of what Sandusky was up to...please review...I’m sure he might repost it on this thread.”

Thanks for the ping:

People we know that knew Sandusky raped little boys.

President Spanier
AD Curley
VP Schultz
PSU Attorney Wendell Courtney
Second Mile Attorney Wendell Courtney
University Police (Detective Ronald Schreffler)
State College Police (Detective Ralph Ralston)
Department of Welfare (Investigator Jerry Lauro)
Child Services
County DA Gricar
County Prosecutors
Coach McQueary
Dr. McQueary (Chief Operating Officer/Administrative Director Centre Medical)
Coach Paterno
Various elementary and high school officials
John DiNunzio (Keystone Central School District Interim Superintendent)
Second Mile officials
Second Mile President Jack Raykovitz
Joe Paterno’s staff including down to the janitors

Still to be determined:

Media
NCAA Coaches (Nobody wanted him when he retired)
Board of Trustees
School Teachers


182 posted on 11/12/2011 7:30:05 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I keep reading about LITTLE boys and CHILDREN, but have YET to see any data that tells the AGE of these folks at the time of the 'crime' in question.

READ the GD Grand Jury report. It's been out a week!

183 posted on 11/12/2011 7:32:13 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Since I do not follow college ‘sports’, I had no idea who Joe was until this hit the news.

Since you do not 'follow' it would be a good idea for you to 'gather a few facts' before coming here and claiming no one has any facts.

184 posted on 11/12/2011 7:38:47 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: NewinTexsas

I have friends in academia and college coaching. Buddy yesterday spoke with Bobby Bowden who told him that everyone thought Sandusky was gay.

I’m in Dallas. Welcome, NewinTexas.


185 posted on 11/12/2011 7:52:17 AM PST by Treeless Branch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"...there have been some posts on FR calling for Sandusky’s wife to be hauled off to jail because some surmise that she must have known or must have been involved herself."

I think she at least needs to be investigated...considering the alleged call she made to one of the victim's prior to his GJ testimony.

If that is proven to be the case, then yes, absolutely, she should also be investigated and charged with covering up for the crime.

The point I was trying to make, and perhaps didn’t make all so well, was that we shouldn’t go on a witch hunt and presume that everyone and anyone even remotely involved is automatically guilty without knowing all the evidence. If Sandusky’s wife knew of his child abuse and was active in trying to cover up his crimes, then yes, she should be held accountable. And I'd have no problem with that.

186 posted on 11/12/2011 7:56:05 AM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Treeless Branch
I have friends in academia and college coaching. Buddy yesterday spoke with Bobby Bowden who told him that everyone thought Sandusky was gay. I’m in Dallas. Welcome, NewinTexas.

I'm NW of Houston. Barry Switzer said no way everyone didn't know. You just don't keep that sort of thing secret in the locker room for that long.

187 posted on 11/12/2011 8:11:01 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: MD Expat in PA
I've never called for a witch hunt. What I've stated repeatedly on a number of these threads is that it seems to me too many people are equating moral culpability with legal culpability. It reeks of psycho-liberal "diversity", "non-judgmentalism", and moral relativism. Sandusky, for example, is fully entitled to due process, and in a legal sense, is certainly entitled to the presumption of innocence. But as I've asked others (without any answers), would you have him come watch your children this weekend while you went out for dinner and a movie? Of course you wouldn't, even though at this point he's been found guilty of absolutely nothing. We have to (or very well should) make our moral judgments based on the information available. There's a lot to be said about liberals reacting to things strictly on the basis of "feelings", but at the same time God has blessed us with our instincts and gut feelings to complement our rationale and our intellect. In a moral person, a "gut feeling" that something isn't right can be of tremendous value even though there may not be any rigidly adjudicated and examined evidence at hand.

If somebody you deeply trusted, respected and admired told you to avoid making a business deal with "Person A" telling you little more than "he's bad news," you would probably heed their advice, even in the absence of any hard evidence. There's nothing wrong with that, and in fact, most of life's decisions are made absent, "all the facts." Unsurprisingly, it seems to me, people with a strong moral compass still tend to make better decisions in the absence of all the information than those who don't have a strongly internalized sense of values to guide them.

For example, I (and all of us) only have a few facts about McQueary's inaction at the time he says he saw Sandusky raping the boy. At this point, no charges have been brought against him, much less adjudicated in a court of law, and in those regards he's fully entitled to the presumption of innocence. That does not in any way preclude me from forming an opinion (a 'judgment') about his role in this based on what I know. I don't have the power to try, convict or sentence him in a legal sense, so I do not have to observe the legal rules of evidence in forming my opinions and actions about him. If he were a member of my community I most certainly would base my actions and interactions with him on my opinions and avoid anything to do with him.

Hypothetically, it may come out that he had a perfectly legitimate, wholesome reason for dithering and walking away from a naked 50-something ass-raping a young boy in the shower, and if that would ever come to light, I'd re-evaluate my opinion of him. As it stands, I can't possibly imagine any possible explanation other than sheer cowardice, and I'll speak of him and his inaction in that regard until I'm persuaded otherwise.

I would imagine if it were McQueary himself, or his little brother being sodomized, he'd have either physically tried to end it immediately, or at the minimum, not hesitated to call 911 at the earliest opportunity. If by his own testimony, he was able to look into the eyes of that boy and simply turn his back to him...that's all I really need to know.

188 posted on 11/12/2011 8:27:17 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: NewinTexsas

LOL, so now Barry Switzer is the new authority.

Keep adding people to your list. Soon we’ll have over a thousand people who knew. Because that’s the logical conclusion - everybody knew Sandusky was a child rapist and they protected him. Makes perfect sense, but why stop there? If you’re accusing dozens or hundreds of people of being complicit, why not accuse the townspeople as well?


189 posted on 11/12/2011 8:27:52 AM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Excellent, articulate post.

Thank you, Joe 6-pack.

190 posted on 11/12/2011 8:45:12 AM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
If you’re accusing dozens or hundreds of people of being complicit, why not accuse the townspeople as well?

It's not called College State and University City for nuttin'

191 posted on 11/12/2011 8:52:49 AM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: NewinTexsas

Wonder if Fidel will be pulling for the Nittany Lions today?


192 posted on 11/12/2011 8:54:09 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

Paterno is a control freak; he knew. His assistant and the assistant’s dad told him in a face-to-face conversation. He was forced to retire for this very reason. Are you trying to say that Paterno would essentially fire a 30-year assistant for no reason?

Paterno made the decision that the facade of integrity and morality at Peen State was more important than the boys who were sexually brutalized. It really is that simple.


193 posted on 11/12/2011 9:26:22 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: linn37

Paterno didn’t deserve an in-person firing.


194 posted on 11/12/2011 9:27:36 AM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

Thanks for pinging me on this thread. I live in the east and it was way past my time to be up. This subject cannot be defended or excused. I had no desire to argue with those that are angry yet loyal. Soon that will become a realization that enablers allowed this to go on, their beloved coach included.


195 posted on 11/12/2011 10:35:55 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: NewinTexsas
Since you do not 'follow' it would be a good idea for you to 'gather a few facts' before coming here and claiming no one has any facts.

I merely said that I hadn't SEEN any.

LOt's of people stating things, but with no LINKS to the ACTUAL police reports.

196 posted on 11/12/2011 10:51:18 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

I guess Joe Paterno’s choice of a high-profile, high-pressure attorney was a good one.

Wick Sollers is on the job now, doing damage control, as we can see by this thread with many “new” FReepers rushing to defend Paterno.

PUHLEEZE! It’s so transparent.

NY Daily News:

Joe Paterno hired a high-powered Washington lawyer to represent him Friday because, his son said, he wants to find the truth in the sex-abuse scandal enveloping Penn State University.

“My father’s desire is for the truth to be uncovered and he will work with his lawyers to that end,” said Scott Paterno, who confirmed that his father had hired J. Sedgwick “Wick” Sollers, who has represented former president George H.W. Bush in the past.

But legal experts wondered if he had begun to fear federal action in the case as well as Pennsylvania’s ongoing criminal investigation.

Paterno

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/college/joe-paterno-hires-lawyer-case-ends-defendant-penn-state-sex-abuse-civil-suit-article-1.976507#ixzz1dWDDrM6C


197 posted on 11/12/2011 11:00:37 AM PST by Palladin (Where is Ray Gricar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Here, that took 5 seconds.

http://www.attorneygeneral.gov/uploadedFiles/Press/Sandusky-Grand-Jury-Presentment.pdf


198 posted on 11/12/2011 11:02:00 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; Lancey Howard

Kudos to Lancey for his post, and thanks for repeating it for those of us who missed it.


199 posted on 11/12/2011 11:11:16 AM PST by Palladin (Where is Ray Gricar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
Paterno took it to the police commissioner and put him in touch with the witness.

When are you going to quit spreading that lie?

200 posted on 11/12/2011 12:11:30 PM PST by NewinTexsas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson