Skip to comments.How Many Victims of Penn State Homosexual Predator Jerry Sandusky Will Think They are ‘Gay’?
Posted on 11/13/2011 6:04:45 AM PST by Diago
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality
November 10, 2011; Contact: Peter LaBarbera: firstname.lastname@example.org
CHICAGOThe discovery that former Penn State University defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky has been molesting boys as young as 10 years old and that university officials including head coach Joe Paterno did not do more to apprehend this predator has shocked America. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH), said the scandal exposes the continuing problem of homosexual predators in society. He offers the following observations related to the PSU scandal:
I worked with a gay man who I became friends with. He is the only gay person I was ever comfortable asking personal questions of. I asked him when he found out he was gay. He told me of his first encounter. He glamorizied it, but he had been molested by an older boy several times and had begun to think of sex as only between 2 men. I think this article is on to something.
Sodom fried for less.
CORONADO, Calif. (AP) - President Barack Obama says the Penn State sex-abuse scandal should lead to "soul-searching" by all Americans, not just Penn State.
"Obviously what happened was heartbreaking, especially for the victims, the young people who got affected by these alleged assaults," he told Westwood One Radio in an interview Friday night, in his first public comments on the scandal.
"And I think it's a good time for the entire country to do some soul-searching - not just Penn State. People care about sports, it's important to us, but our No. 1 priority has to be protecting our kids. And every institution has to examine how they operate, and every individual has to take responsibility for making sure that our kids are protected."
(Excerpt) Read more at wkrn.com ...
Meanwhile, remember this guy?
Obama's (former) "Safe School Czar" Kevin
"use a condom" Jennings
From the Washington Times...
EDITORIAL: At the president's pleasure
'Safe school czar' encouraged child sex with an older man
September 28, 2009
A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse. That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar". It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down.
In this one case in which Mr. Jennings had a real chance to protect a young boy from a sexual predator, he not only failed to do what the law required but actually encouraged the relationship.
According to Mr. Jennings' own description in a new audiotape discovered by Fox News, the 15-year-old boy met the "older man" in a "bus station bathroom" and was taken to the older man's home that night. When some details about the case became public, Mr. Jennings threatened to sue another teacher who called his failure to report the statutory rape "unethical." Mr. Jennings' defenders asserted that there was no evidence that he was aware the student had sex with the older man.
However, the new audiotape contradicts this claim. In 2000, Mr. Jennings gave a talk to the Iowa chapter of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, an advocacy group that promotes homosexuality in schools. On the tape, Mr. Jennings recollected that he told the student to make sure "to use a condom" when he was with the older man. That he actively encouraged the relationship is reinforced by Mr. Jennings' own description in his 1994 book, "One Teacher in 10." In that account, the teacher boasts how he allayed the student's concerns about the relationship to such a degree that the 15-year-old "left my office with a smile on his face that I would see every time I saw him on the campus for the next two years, until he graduated."
Mr. Jennings' denials about these events reveal a lack of remorse. He has not admitted that he made mistakes in this case, and he now refuses to answer any questions about the scandal. Don't forget, this is a presidential appointee we're talking about. Mr. Obama should make clear what his standards are for public servants serving at the pleasure of the president. Encouraging and covering up man-boy sexual activity are serious offenses. The White House should force Mr. Jennings to come clean.
Be the Change Announces New President and CEO
Assistant Deputy Secretary of Education Kevin Jennings to Succeed Be the Change Founder Alan Khazei
BOSTON, May 19, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Be the Change announced today that, following a national search, Kevin Jennings will succeed Alan Khazei as President and CEO. Mr. Jennings will officially begin his new role on July 25, 2011.
"We are delighted to draw a leader of Kevin's caliber to succeed Alan," said Be the Change board chair Josh Bekenstein of Bain Capital. "His experience both leading a national nonprofit as well as working in the federal government makes him the ideal leader to take the reigns as Alan takes on new challenges."
Be the Change was founded by Alan Khazei in 2007. Prior to founding Be the Change, Mr. Khazei co-founded City Year (www.CityYear.org), a national nonprofit that unites young people of all backgrounds for a year of full-time service, giving them the skills and opportunities to change the world. ..."
"Change will not come if we wait for some other person or if we wait for some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek"-- BARACK OBAMA
Then need the risk-taking pederasts to groom the rising cohort of soon-to-be “gay” teens for them to exploit.
Homosexuals can't reproduce, they can only recruit.
That's where the sodomite pederasts like Sandusky come into the picture: they are the front-line recruiters.
I think if you probed the backgrounds of most “gay” men, you would find similar stories of grooming and seduction by sodomite pederasts.
“Then need” should be “They need” above. Typing and sending too fast.
All of them, NAMBLA’s motto is “After eight is too late”
The PC crowd can attempt to spin it any way they'd like, but it doesn't change a thing.
I am totally taken back by all the people coming out in support of Joe Paterno. They've put Penn State football before the victims.
Joe Paterno knew about this pedophile and helped cover it up. Great coach or not, he should pay a penalty for allowing more young boys to become victims.
Why is what Sandusky did wrong?
Thats the fundamental question FReepers should be asking. The media and schools tell us that humans are sexual creatures. Sanduskys behavior is clearly homosexual - same sex attraction. It is also pedophilia, despite the vagaries of the definition, yet sex we are told is normal and good without any bounds. Man-Woman marriage is a religious imposition per their worldview.
If homosexuality isnt abnormal then that aspect of his action is morally OK to the secular media and government schools. What then is wrong with what he did?
Is it the age difference? Is it the vulnerability of the child? Is it that the boys were unwilling participants?
If the boys were 14-17 year olds would it change peoples perspective? If they werent fatherless children from vulnerable backgrounds would it be OK? What if all the children stated that they were willing participants, would that make it OK?
What if Sandusky groomed them until they were 18 or older and then started a physically sexual relationship with young men from vulnerable backgrounds. Would that be OK because consent is implied?
Sandusky speaks directly to the moral vacuum created by liberalism. We must ask liberals why is what Sandusky did wrong and under what circumstances would it be OK or acceptable behavior?
At what point would Jerry Sandusky’s behavior be acceptable?
The argument strikes at the heart of the worldview separating liberals from conservatives.
For a long time I have believed that most if not all gay men were young victims of older male gays. This article is not at all surprising.
I suspect that the boys that Sandusky targeted from all of those in that organization already exhibited effeminate characteristics. Since the organization was for “troubled kids”, parents likely sent their young boys hoping this all star team would help their sons “man up”.
Sandusky, as a Chicken Hawk, would understand this and was willing to take advantage. I’m not convinced that Sandusky’s treachery turned straight kids gay, they were likely leaning that way already, but his introduction to the “lifestyle” will scar their emotional well being for life.
Gays would love to lower the age of consent. Then their actions wouldn’t be illegal just immoral.
The difference is critical in this debate.
Pederasts are the homosexual “bridge” used to entice and recruit malleable adolescent boys.
>>The argument strikes at the heart of the worldview separating liberals from conservatives<<
The argument strikes at the heart of the worldview separating Gods law from the evil that permeates the world.
I didn’t say it, it’s in my owners manual.
Homosexuals feed us this BS about being born homosexual.
I have a Great-Nephew , queer as a three dollar bill who was molested by his father. His sister swings both ways, she was also molested by the father. The father didn’t serve one day in jail and a liberal judge actually gave him unsupervised visits with these children after the my Neice discovered what was going on. Of course he was related to the local Sherriff.
A very few of these creeps may be born with homosexual urges ,but most are recruited, and the recruitment office has never been so open as it is today. We have homo clubs in High school and many school boards are teaching that homosexuality is an accepted practice. Homo parades and homo marriage all promoting their sick agenda..It will never be accepted by me.
I believe that every homosexual is a potential child molester.I don’t want any of them around my grandchildren.
The preference for homosexual sex is their main driving force. There is no true marital love except between a man and a woman, everything else is horse dung.
Read it and weep.
Do you have any evidence for this chain of speculation, or are you simply making up a story in support of some pre-existing belief that you don’t wish to state outright?
If Sandusky had simply groomed the young men until their 18th birthdays, then had homosexual sex with them, he would still be a monster, but a “legal” monster.
And this scenario plays out every day on every campus of our Predatory Sodomite Universities, where the teens have been “groomed” by years of PC brainwashing (”Glee” etc etc etc) to accept homosexual overtures as totally normal and beautiful.
Sandusky just jumped the gun by a few years, so he is rightly condemned.
But what about the homosexual profs and coaches who are careful not to make their moves until their malleable charges are one day over 17 years old? After years of the “Glee” message, teens are putty in the hands of older pederastic sodomites.
They are even lauded, like PSU Presiden Spanier, who vowed to make his college the most “gay friendly” in America.
I’ve actually seen on a public board (not this one) someone defending Sandisky saying these were “post pubescent gay males”.
Age of consent is 15 in Holland.
Boy rape is common in Muslim countries.
Read the article I just posted on the teachers fired for reporting molestation. McQueary knew his career was on the line and kept his mouth shut. Paterno knew it’d hurt the program and lead to big lawsuits. So he shut up.
Many other “Penn States” out there. Look up info on DC child sex ring.
Why does the author bother to ask a question and never answer it? The statistics are out there in multiple studies: around 70% of boys who are molested by men have end up having sexual identity issues with homosexuality. - Lisak, “The Psychological Impact of Sexual Abuse”
Excellent point. All the questions you ask are not just about the “liberal” worldview, but about the worldview of anyone who takes a “libertarian” view of sexual activity.
Once sex outside normal marriage is accepted, there is no logical point for objection to any activity, other than the absence of physical force.
Lots of boys are very mixed up and unsure at that age—easy putty in the hands of a pederastic sodomite.
That doesn’t mean they were destined to by homosexual adults. They might have just needed a few more years to “man up.”
Pederasts steal that chance from these vulnerable kids.
Horsewhipping followed by public hanging would be about right for them.
We need to send the message to the sodomites: HANDS OFF OUR KIDS!
And that also means the coaches and profs who prey on “barely legal” teens who just arrived at Predatory Sodomite University.
I’ve been searching for the reason the old media has held on to this story. The homosexuals have everything they want now, except sympathy. Notice that it wasn’t the kids who brought this to the public’s attention. They don’t worry about the boys going public. Is this the first move in a sympathy campaign for homosexuals? Now that they have everything they want, homosexuality must no longer be viewed as a genetic condition. That would mean they’re ill and homosexuality could be fixed. Now it’s the feel sorry story. “Uncle Bob raped me when I was a boy. Don’t you feel sorry for me? I can’t help it. Give me your money.” I say, cut old Uncle Bob’s balls off and get some therapy. Oh, it was always just about the money. Sorry.
I would also suspect that a significant percentage of boys ( and very young teens) who are molested by adult women also have issues later in forming healthy relationships with women, in marriage, in the community, and on the job.
I am sad to see the flippant remarks made when the “hot teacher” articles are posted.
And of course we can point to societies that culturally “groom” boys to be gay, such as in Samoa where the first boy is raised hetero, and the rest are raised homo. Most of the boys raised to be homo in fact do incline that way, proving the case of nurture over nature when it comes to homosexual inclinations.
Probably most of them, unfortunately. One of the things that “gay” people have in common is they were molested by criminals as children
Perhaps, but at least these teenage boys seduced by women will not have problems with their gender identity.
That’s a WORLD of difference.
The Freepers are “asking” because they know the difference between right and wrong. Homosexual activity is wrong. Sex with children is wrong. Actually, sex outside of marriage is wrong.
The Freepers aren’t “asking” because they know the difference between right and wrong. Homosexual activity is wrong. Sex with children is wrong. Actually, sex outside of marriage is wrong.
I ran out of that place as fast as I could. Over the years, I wonder if some young, vulnerable, lonely, stupid 18-19 year old kid went in there, that this or some other professor molested.
I do know that sadly many of those molested will end up molesting as adults. Therefore a Don Lemon may be homosexual but he may also end up molesting children.
I’ve heard surveillance tapes of pedophiles talking about how much they want to be exactly like the adult who molested them, praising the way their molester was heartless and striving to molest kids with just as little remorse. Very chilling stuff.
Most pedophiles are stuck on a certain age group and are distinct from adult leaning homosexuals. They lose interest once the kid moves beyond their target age.
Great post. This is a homosexual child abuse scandal. That is a clear description of what is going on, but the media refuse to call it that.
The PC brainwashing teens get today prior to college age leaves them wide open to be attacked by sodomites.
Recoiling in horror, as you did in 1981, would now be considered “intolerant.”
Tax chick, most “gays” were molested as kids. It’s fact, not fiction. They aren’t “gay” anymore than you are. They are a psychological wreck because some sex fiend committed a crime on them when they were kids.
Very much so. I have yet to meet a man who was molested by a women who could be considered well-adjusted.
The damage is different from men who are molested by men but it tends to be every bit as significant.
Or the Omaha coverup. I thought it was so sick that PS was playing Omaha yesterday.
I do know one adult gay male who was attacked as a teen...he said he was around 16 when it occurred and the attacker was 20. That’s rather post-pubescent.
I’ve worked with many gay people and the vast majority have had rather normal up-bringings without histories of molestation to hear them tell it. Otherwise normal and rational people in everyday dealings.
The most telling discussion I ever had with any of them was one where I was told to think about the feelings I had for girls in high school and he said that he had those same feeling for other boys instead. He couldn’t explain it other than that’s what his brain and body told him to do. I had a hard time countering that argument.
Not all molesters are homosexuals and not all homosexuals are sexual predators. How many hetero child molesters (hello, fundamental LDS’ers) are lurking out there in our midst victimizing the young?
Yes, I understand that. My question was about the poster’s assumption that the boys who were molested were “effeminate” or “already leaning that way” before they were victimized by Mr. Sandusky.
Without evidence presented, this seems to me to be a “just-so story” invented to support the concept that there is a population of people “pre-set,” as it were, to become practicing homosexuals.
Probably not, but I haven't seen any articles or studies on the long term emotional, social, sexual identity, and psychological damage done when adult women molest boys.
The point is that the flippant comments found on the “hot teacher” threads are very dismissive of what could be serious damage to a child's life as an adult.
Only killing babies by abortion could possibly supersede this perversity for being the most horrible thing going on in the country that so many political leaders endorse. Thanks to God for the large block of Republicans, and the small block of Democrats, who have endorsed neither abortion nor sexual perversion.
oh yeah, that “effeminate” stuff is garbage.
Wintertime, I can’t tell if you are a man or a woman, but as a man, let me assure you that there is NO COMPARISON between a 25 year old woman seducing a 15 year old boy, and a 50 year old pederastic sodomite grooming, seducing, and raping a ten year old boy.
Me too. And that's one of many reasons I never recommend this forum to anyone. There was a time that I did, but the rise of inappropriate content changes that.
Restoring the Republic involves a LOT more than electing the right people. A return to moral clarity is required. It's all well and good to rail on the queers, but celebrating heterosexual lust is to be equally railed against.
Pederasts are a necessary “bridge” for the adult homosexual community, a key link in the grooming process that turns mixed up boys into easy putty for later homosexual overtures.
The argument strikes at the heart of the worldview separating liberals from conservatives.
Good question. Good point!
Homosexuals are usually the product of weak or non-existent fathers. Ask these homosexuals what their relationship with their father was like....I bet it was either that the dad was working all the time and ignored them, or beat them (that isn’t strength, but weakness), or psychologically abused them (mockery, mind games, etc.). The child didn’t develop the masculine traits needed, and became vulnerable to feelings for men that a lack of a strong father had.
As an adult heterosexual male who was molested by a pederastic sodomite at age 13, I'm calling BS on that, Bunny.
The other thing is that these boys didn’t have dads. From what I’ve read, homosexuality can also come from a desire for affection from a dad, which becomes sexualized so that boys look to the sexual arms of an older man because they so crave the non-sexual physical affection from a dad who wasn’t there.
So these boys were probably vulnerable in several ways. And because our society refuses to see homosexuality as a symptom resulting from different causes, these boys will never understand what they’re really longing for. Homosexual relationships will not be able to heal them and they will go from one hurt to another, never understanding the real solution for their hunger.
I say this because I have had to work through my own issues in the same way. My issue wasn’t homosexuality but it was a hunger, and until I came to understand what I was really dealing with, I looked to all the wrong things to satisfy the hunger. It surprised me when a pastor friend suggested that I read a pamphlet about homosexuality, but I was immediately able to recognize that the same dynamics were at work in my own heart and life. Gay people often think they are so different from everybody else, but anybody who has acquired untrue emotional expectations from before they were able to mentally process them deals with the same dynamics.
I hurt for these boys, and I am very, very sad that they will struggle because our society refuses to really understand where homosexuality comes from.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.