Skip to comments.
Ex-Coach (Sandusky) Denies Charges Amid New Accusations (close to 10 additional suspected victims)
NYTimes ^
| November 14, 2011
| MARK VIERA and JO BECKER
Posted on 11/15/2011 6:54:56 AM PST by maggief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: dfwgator
Sandusky isn’t a Michael Jackson.
61
posted on
11/15/2011 11:49:34 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Yes, I think it did stop because Sandusky saw him, but McQurey didn't stop it, and he left without the boy.
Why comment that both saw you, if you had stopped it, it would be a redundent statement.
Had he stopped Sandusky that would have been part of the narrative.
62
posted on
11/15/2011 11:52:30 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: fortheDeclaration
Sandusky isnt a Michael Jackson. What's the difference?
63
posted on
11/15/2011 11:53:18 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(I stand with Herman Cain.)
To: maggief
Not regarding what Sandusky was doing, that doesn’t change.
64
posted on
11/15/2011 11:53:31 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: Tupelo
Sandusky will get his day in court.
Do you mind if people are able to form opinions outside of court, or do we have endure lectures from those who think we are not able to do so until after the trial?
65
posted on
11/15/2011 11:55:07 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: Jukeman
There will plenty who were, this guy has been doing this for years.
66
posted on
11/15/2011 11:55:56 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Agreed! This guy won't be able to work again in a major University.
He sold his soul for a mess of pottage.
67
posted on
11/15/2011 11:57:29 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: maggief
Why would McQueary lie?
Why would he risk saying such a thing to Petrano?
Moreover, this isn't the only charge made against Sandusky, who likes to shower with young boys.
68
posted on
11/15/2011 11:59:28 AM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: SorbetCon
However he relayed it to Petrano, it still dealt with a young boy and should have been dealt with as a possible crime.
This guy had a history of these acts.
Petrano is in on the coverup.
69
posted on
11/15/2011 12:01:44 PM PST
by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: GAgal
It sounds from the transcripts that was not aired that he is admitting to seeking out some of the boys for sexual needs. By saying that he didn’t seek out every young person for sexual needs he is admitting that he did seek out some, correct? Why wasn’t that part aired? That’s a bombshell!!
To: maggief
The 10 year old ‘looking’ kid that McQueary saw was unidentified. Nobody but the kid who looked 10 years old and Sandusky would know, given the description McQueary gave, that it was HIM in the shower with Sandusky.
So Sandusky found someone who is willing to claim they were in the shower with him, but there was no rhythmic slapping of wet flesh against wet flesh, and no anal sex - despite McQueary’s testimony.
Color me unimpressed.
Color me disgusted at those circling the wagons around this sick bastard.
71
posted on
11/15/2011 12:08:03 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: fortheDeclaration
Of course he has and he needs to be punished for each and every one of them. All I am saying is there are Allreds of the world who are like pimps and they don’t care whether a crime has been committed as long as they can profit from a situation.
72
posted on
11/15/2011 12:39:13 PM PST
by
Jukeman
Click the Pic Thank you, JoeProBono
Gary Has Not Been Seen Since He Parachuted to Safety!
Follow the Exciting Adventures of Gary the Snail!
Become a Monthly Donor
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each New Monthly Donor
73
posted on
11/15/2011 12:48:25 PM PST
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: Tupelo
Tupelo,
Sandusky was a counselor for a camp that deals with troubled kids. By law he has to attended training and has signed forms stating that he knows what is and isn't against the law.
If he was observed naked, showering with naked boys and “horsing around” with them. He would be terminated, the police would be called in to investigate and all parents whose children attend the program would be notified.
The fact that that wasn't even done at the bare minimum shows to me cover-up has taken place.
We at freerepublic understand the Constitution and understand that this is not a court of law. This is a discussion forum where the we discuss topics and news stories.
Is your premise that legal issues should not be discussed until a juries verdict is read?
Would you feel better if we placed a disclaimer on each post that states “All accused are innocent until proved guilty in a court of law”?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson