Skip to comments.What Could End Rush Limbaugh's Career?
Posted on 11/17/2011 10:04:23 AM PST by servo1969
It was surprising to hear Rush Limbaugh say the words, I dont have the guts to bring it up, but he did, on November 8th, to his massive radio audience.
Rush Limbaugh lacking the guts to address something publicly? Rush Limbaugh not willing to tackle controversy? Really?
He was responding to a statement by a caller named Lawrence as they discussed Joe Paterno and the scandal at Penn State.
CALLER: Whats that?
RUSH: Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it, and that's all I'll say. If you can figure it out on your own, fine and dandy. . . .
What was Rush talking about?
Lets put this in context. If there is any prominent figure in America who does not bow down to political correctness or media pressure, it is Rush Limbaugh. In fact, hes on record as saying that when people try to silence you, you should shout louder.
What is it that, in his words, could end his career? What is it about the Penn State scandal that is glaring; it's right in front of everybody, and yet Nobody has the guts to actually give the explanation for what was going on and why there was trepidation in reporting it?
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
I have no doubt that Homosexual activists can be deadly.
OTOH, if major power brokers are buggering kids and he doesn't have the goods to spell it out and they have the fire power to take him down, well, that would shut just about anybody up.
And if they have the fire power to take him down, well . . .
We owe a lot to Rush for getting this whole Conservative Talk radio thing going, and leading hundreds of thousands to conservatism, including my parents. But his show is no wear as captivating as it use to be.
And let’s not forget that Michael Brown is a talk show host who constantly talks about social issues - and has an audience nationally that would fit into one block of Rush’s listeners in a single big city.
A definite parting of emphasis, perhaps combined with a smidgeon of jealousy?????
Not true. I remember the Gay Community update with that guy singing falsetto and “My Boy Loolipop” referring to Barney Frank’s boy toy using his house for a gay prostitution ring.
That was in the mid 90’s.
After reading through the posts - it just occurred to me that Rush only criticizes elected officials and policy. Nothing on the ‘Nancy Grace’ milieu i.e. Michael Jackson, missing children, Anna Nicole Smith etc.,
Does anyone remember Rush discussing high profile trials like O.J. Simpson?
Perhaps his insurance does not cover libel or slander????
Could be that someone on his staff is "sensitive" to the issue.
I argue this issue every chance I get. I am disgusted with all the Libertarian types that simply cannot comprehend that there is something mentally wrong with males who do not want females. Pedophilia is just an alternative fetish to someone with this disorder.
Many of the libertarians use the tu quoque argument that "Heterosexuals do it too!" Oblivious to the fact that 2% of the population is accounting for the vast bulk of male child buggery. They simply overlook and refuse to consider every bit of evidence that doesn't conform to what they wish to believe.
If I were Rush Limbaugh, I'd keep my mouth shut about the gays, while trying to get the truth out about everything else. If Rush does summon the courage to come out against the gays, I predict he'll end up in prison or murdered within five years. (And, no, I'm not kidding.)
What are you trying to say here?
I think he is like Reagan -- someone who doesn't particularly hate homosexuals and is inclined to live and let live.
That, too. Big-time football is an institution to big to fail. But the sports industry has become so PC that it is hard to remember when it was not.
This is too easy, so hear it is, it was said in early reports that they were pimping the young boys out to the big football donors......For some reason after the second of third day this part of the story disappeared. My guess is it’s true, and that some of the men buying sex with young boys are big time pols, business men and newsmen.
The homosexual community will not and has not condemned NAMBLA. It is still part of the gay movement...
It’s pretty much a given that gays control the entertainment industry lock, stock and barrel.
Entertainers know they will be ‘blacklisted’ if they go against the gay agenda, which in essence means, supporting any conservative politician, or refusing to “pile on” when somebody says something against Sarah Palin. It’s like that old saying, “To get along, you go along.”
Mmm.. How about the fact that most of Sandusky’s child victims were reporedly black kids? Inner-city “throwaway” black kids. I guess it was just a little easier for Sandusky’s enablers to look the other way. Throw in the oppressive political correctness of the Penn State campus and the hounddog homosexual mafia and you have the recipe for the current scandal.
I don’t know why Rush would fear addressing any of this, but I have noticed over the decades that Rush generally steers way clear of issues concerning sodomy, pedophilia, homosexuality, beastiality, lesbianism, necrophilia, and all that gay stuff.
He barely touches it.
He’s a coward, like most of the other so-called conservatives.
Now our country is basically being ruled by the pro-sodomy and pederasty elites on all fronts. Thanks to those who should have spoken up but didn’t.