Posted on 11/18/2011 5:17:46 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
NEW YORK (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain says "all of these women are lying" about unwanted sexual advances.
In appearance on David Letterman's "Late Show" airing Friday night, the former pizza executive is again denying any impropriety during his time running the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
born December 13, 1945 in Memphis, TN (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Parents were
Luther Cain Jr., born March 16, 1925 in TN, died March 29, 1982 in Atlanta, GA
Lenora Davis, born July 27, 1925 in GA, died August 20, 2005 in Atlanta, GA
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of his birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Herman Cain is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama ISN'T!
Click on the cane, (Obama, You're Fired.)
Agreed. Not sure why Conservatives still appear on his show every now and then.
*facepalm*
What this meant as a joke?
Actually, thus far, at most one woman (okay, two if you count her lawyer) is lying about unwanted sexual advances. Only Bialek has asserted that Cain made an unwanted sexual advance.
Kraushaar has asserted Cain was a “monster”, but has given no specifics, but we know that she is the sort who regarded a sophomoric e-mail circulated at her next job as “sexual harassment”. Besides that we have the one who’s not talking and remaining anonymous. Again whether Cain’s purported behavior is something a sane person without deBeauvoirian ideological commitments would regard as “harassment” is something neither we nor reporters for the AP know. Nor, given the breadth of the notion of “sexual harassment” feminists have advanced and in some cases codified into law (cf. Kraushaar’s complaint at her next job) is there any basis for inferring that the complaint was based on unwanted sexual advances. And, finally, the “he asked us to arrange a luncheon date” accusation, which involved no assertion that Cain made a sexual advance, unwanted or otherwise.
The fact that both Kraushaar and the still-anonymous complainant settled for a modest severance package, rather than filing an EEOC complaint, actually suggests that their complaints were far weaker than would have been the case were they based on actual unwanted sexual advances.
That's right. There's a difference between a sexual advance, and a woman saying she felt "uncomfortable." A woman can claim she feels "uncomfortable" if she overhears a man tell his wife on the phone, "I can't wait to get home tonight and make mad monkey love with you."
Or she can claim harassment if she sees an email comparing men to women in a computer cartoon. It doesn't mean there was an unwanted sexual advance.
How dare he give Cain a hard time about Mark Block smoking in the internet video, when Letterman used to smoke his cigar on every single show.
Freggin’ hypocrite.
I have issues with this show.
Cain did OK on somethings but got mocked hard on others.
Letterman was brutal.
Letterman’s such a condescending and hostile punk. He treated Herman bad but Herman didn’t seem to back down from him.
It is curious that Herman didn’t slap Dave between the eyes with his own female issues, but then again why mud wrestle?
If Gingrich is so smart why does he have so much dirty laundry hanging out?
Anyone who stays in Washington DC long enough eventually gets tainted.
That is true, but Newty is no Saint.
My take on this is that while Perry got hammered for going on the Lettermans show and playing along with poking fun at the 53 seconds gaffe, Cain got grilled HARD by Letterman.
Cain did well but he got grilled HARD and some of it is going to stick.
Hmmmmm....stinks of TROLL in here.
Sniff.. Sniff
AND, Letterman didn’t even shake his hand when Cain came over to sit down. Nice manners Dave.
Did Herman extend his hand?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
