Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condoleezza Rice: My role models are ‘old white men’
The Daily Caller ^ | 11/18/2011 | Caroline May

Posted on 11/19/2011 5:15:31 PM PST by neverdem

Candy Crowley, host of CNN’s “State of the Union,” interviewed former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice before the 2011 Women Working for Change Conference about her new book “No Higher Honor,” the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and politics at National Harbor near Washington, D.C. on Friday.

Between questions about history and policy Rice had some advice for those attempting to find their path to success. According to the former secretary of state, people should first find what they love to do and dedicate themselves to it.

Rice recalled how her parents, when she was growing up in segregated Alabama, would tell her that she needed to be twice as good — Rice said that should apply even outside of a racial paradigm.

“They meant [twice as good] in a racial context but I think ‘you have to be twice as good’ is not bad advice for anybody because if you are constantly striving to be twice as good, you’ll work really really hard,” she said. “I think it is important to have people in your life who will take an interest in you and your career and help guide you.”

Rice then explained her philosophy on role models.

“I know we sometimes say you had to have role models who look like you, well I don’t really believe that. If I had been looking for a black, female, Soviet specialist role model, I’d still be looking,” she said. “Also my role models are actually white men — as a matter of fact, old white men, because that is what my field was dominated by.”

She added that women and minorities should try to steer clear of quickly crying “sexism” or “racism,” advising that they give people “the benefit of the doubt.”

“I think it is extremely important, particularly if you are a female or a minority, not to assume the worst in people. Give them the benefit of the doubt, maybe they just don’t like what you are saying. Maybe they just don’t like you. Maybe it doesn’t have to do with your race or gender,” she said. “And if you are constantly referring to race or gender as the reason you are treated badly, then you are just going to burn yourself out.”

Beyond Rice’s life lessons, the former secretary of state under George W. Bush again defended the administration’s decisions to go into Iraq and Afghanistan, noting the lessons learned from Sept. 11, 2001.

“We got rid of one of the biggest threats,” Rice said regarding Saddam Hussein and the decision to invade Iraq.

“Also, with all due respect to those wanted to save the Libyans from Muammar Gadhafi, and I am glad they did — but he threatened his people. Saddam Hussein put 400,000 of his own people in mass graves. Where is the humanitarian outrage about that?” Rice asked. “So those who believed there was a humanitarian reason for overthrowing Gadhafi, was there not a humanitarian reason for overthrowing Saddam Hussein?”

Rice further asserted that she believes that America can still complete the mission in Afghanistan.

Crowley asked Rice how history will remember the administration and its controversial foreign policy decisions, such as the use of enhanced interrogation.

“I think what history will say about that whole complex of instruments and tools is that the President of the United States protected the country under enormous threats, he did it in accordance with our laws, and in accordance with our values,” Rice said, adding that overtime as America learned more about the enemy there was not as much need to use some of the more controversial information gathering tools.

“They will say that [Bush] left his next president, President Barack Obama, an infrastructure that allowed finally — and I am very grateful to Barack Obama — to kill Osama Bin Laden, to continue the war on terror on the basis of what was put in place, and I think the historians will understand that we were in a different kind of war and we needed different tools.”

Rice added that she does not plan to go back into public service, but instead continue her work as a professor at Stanford — adding that it was a professor who got her involved in policy work as a Soviet studies specialist.

“There is nothing better being a university professor,” she said. “You have these great students you get to help see a world that they might otherwise not see. It was a professor who helped me see that I wanted to be –of all things– a Soviet specialist,” noting that as an young African American from Birmingham, Ala. she did not fit what most would think to be a Soviet specialist.

The 66th secretary of state also had some harsh words for people who assume all African-Americans should be Democrats.

“Nobody needs to tell me how to be black. I’ve been black it all my life. So I often say to people, if you think you know what I think because I have black skin, that says a lot about your prejudice, because you would not look at somebody with white skin and think you know what they think,” she said.

“So the people who want to criticize black conservatives or black Republican, first of all they generally don’t know us and the wide variety of views that we hold,” Rice continued. “But they also are among the most prejudice people in the world because they just want to look at you ant tell you what you ought to think and where you ought to be.”

Rice will be appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday morning with Crowley.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: condoleezzarice; oldwhitemen; rice

1 posted on 11/19/2011 5:15:34 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All


Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 11/19/2011 5:16:43 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Go Condi!


3 posted on 11/19/2011 5:26:19 PM PST by Gene Eric (Save a pretzel for the gas jet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

Would make a great number 2 with Romney. Not a great Romney fan but let’s face it he’s going to be the nominee and the main objective is to get rid of Obama.


5 posted on 11/19/2011 5:34:21 PM PST by golf lover (going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I just started reading her book this week.


6 posted on 11/19/2011 5:37:20 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golf lover

I will not be voting for Romney under any circumstances.


7 posted on 11/19/2011 5:47:28 PM PST by BooRadley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: golf lover

You do know you are at FR right? We do NOT vote for the pro choice, anti-second amendment, mandated healthcare freakin’ snake romney. Never...No way...EVER!


8 posted on 11/19/2011 5:52:17 PM PST by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: golf lover

Romney Supporters have been purged from FR once and I don’t doubt they wil be again..


9 posted on 11/19/2011 5:59:15 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“Nobody needs to tell me how to be black. I’ve been black it all my life. So I often say to people, if you think you know what I think because I have black skin, that says a lot about your prejudice, because you would not look at somebody with white skin and think you know what they think,” she said.

“So the people who want to criticize black conservatives or black Republican, first of all they generally don’t know us and the wide variety of views that we hold,” Rice continued. “But they also are among the most prejudice people in the world because they just want to look at you ant tell you what you ought to think and where you ought to be.”

Bears repeating..

10 posted on 11/19/2011 6:02:25 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We saw Condoleezza Rice at her lecture and book signing at the Reagan Library last night; not so much of a lecture but an interview on key episodes from her book and her service in the Bush 43 Administration, plus audience questions. She was similarly direct and insightful and really took it to "moderate" Republican presidential candidates (not individually but as a group) and to the foreign policy incompetence of the current president.

I was very impressed as I had expected her to be more subdued in her comments now that she's out of office. If she could stick to the principles she talked about and happened to be running for president, I would vote for her over the current crowd.

11 posted on 11/19/2011 6:03:21 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
My, my, that's terribly politically incorrect, Condi. You can't say that.

Oh, you just did. Never mind, then.

12 posted on 11/19/2011 6:04:03 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223

Good luck with your 4 more with Barry!


13 posted on 11/19/2011 6:20:20 PM PST by golf lover (going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BooRadley

Good luck with your 4 more with Barry!


14 posted on 11/19/2011 6:21:44 PM PST by golf lover (going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BooRadley

Amen. He is a gun-hating leftist.


15 posted on 11/19/2011 6:27:52 PM PST by ExpatGator (I hate Illinois Nazis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

“But they also are among the most prejudice people in the world because they just want to look at you ant tell you what you ought to think and where you ought to be.”

That’s worse than prejudice... that’s going back to slavery when your master told you what to think.


16 posted on 11/19/2011 6:31:03 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BooRadley

then you are voting for Obama


17 posted on 11/19/2011 6:34:59 PM PST by copwife (All God's creatures have a place in the choir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: golf lover
Would make a great number 2 with Romney.

Yeah, that's what we need, two baby killers on the ticket. You couldn't pay me to vote for either of them, ever/

18 posted on 11/19/2011 6:44:02 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Of course Obama loves his country but Herman Cain loves mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
She was an incompetent National Security Advisor and an even more incompetent Secretary of State.

And she's an Obama fan...

Condoleezza Rice on Obama's Victory

Rice meets with Obama, then defends his administration's approach

19 posted on 11/19/2011 6:45:15 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Don't Tread on Me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copwife

I still would bet Condi voted for Obama.

Of course there is no way of finding out.


20 posted on 11/19/2011 6:45:42 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

So what? Does that negate her extraordinarily important words on the topic of feminaziism/racism? We take our allies where we can, from my point of view.


21 posted on 11/19/2011 6:54:31 PM PST by jobim (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Stoat

Great story. Underestimate Dr. Rice at your own risk.


22 posted on 11/19/2011 7:04:05 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

All contributions are for the
Current Quarter Expenses.


23 posted on 11/19/2011 7:18:17 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: golf lover
the main objective is to get rid of Obama.

The only objective is to get rid of big-government, socialism, statism, etc., etc. and get back to a government that recognizes and adheres to the Constitution, i.e., not prohibiting the free exercise of religion, the infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, etc.

So if electing a Republican would result in more of the above-described actions by government, then I would consider voting for a Democrat if I believed their election would result in less of those actions. If both the Republican AND the Democrat would both result in MORE of those actions, then it would be worse for conservatives if the Republican was elected, since their failures would reflect on Republicans, and, therefore, in many people's minds, also on conservatism.

A great example of a Republican failure in this regard was President Bush's bailouts. Those actions were not conservative in any way, shape or form, but they established a horrificly unconstitutional precedent for future Presidents to follow and they tainted the Republican party with cronyism and unconstitutional and decidedly unconservative economics.

America will continue down the path to destruction until the Goldman-government cabal is ripped apart. A truly conservative President should and would do this even if it meant having to assign protective services to Treasury and Justice Department officials after replacing most of them. It would be quick and easy, like ripping off a bandaid(tm) if it was just done and over with.
24 posted on 11/19/2011 7:24:39 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: copwife

I agree, if we dont vote , we end up voting for the dem candidate- there is never a perfect candidate, but if romney or Obama is the choice, you pick the better of the 2


25 posted on 11/19/2011 7:31:08 PM PST by mriguy67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BooRadley

[ I will not be voting for Romney under any circumstances. ]

If Romney wins the primarys.. not voting for him will be two votes for Negrodamus..

1. no vote for the republican..
2. making one vote for Zero twice as potent..


26 posted on 11/19/2011 7:37:17 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Who were you before you became Timber Rattler? With your credentials you surely found this site sometime before Nov, 2011.


27 posted on 11/19/2011 7:44:26 PM PST by jstaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bobby.223

So you speak for all Freepers? I guess there is no point in posting anything from here on out. You’ll take it form here.


28 posted on 11/19/2011 8:08:50 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mriguy67

As the great Howie Carr says”You go for the one who will hurt you least”, and as I don’t think that anyone other than satan is worse than obama,it would have to be Romney.


29 posted on 11/19/2011 8:31:32 PM PST by copwife (All God's creatures have a place in the choir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jstaff
Who were you before you became Timber Rattler? With your credentials you surely found this site sometime before Nov, 2011.

My spider senses were also tingling.
30 posted on 11/19/2011 10:07:59 PM PST by PA Engineer (Time to beat the swords of government tyranny into the plowshares of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
hosepipe said: "If Romney wins the primarys.. not voting for him will be two votes for Negrodamus.."

While that is true, I am still quite content that I didn't vote for Schwarzenegger in Kalifornia. His incompetence and lack of principles accomplished nothing for conservatives and made it inevitable that Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown would get a return engagement in Sacramento.

I might vote for Romney if he gets the nomination, but I will forever despise the RINO supporters who joined the liberal media in suggesting that he is a Republican and not a Democrat.

31 posted on 11/19/2011 10:32:45 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Gene Eric

well.... leftists didn’t see a good reason to not recognize the Khmer Rouge either. The mass murderers still held the UN seat long after they lost their country.... all the way to 1993! The “Killing Fields” didn’t stop western governments and the UN from siding with the KR over other groups vying for control.


32 posted on 11/20/2011 12:02:40 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
I'm a sap for numbers.

Even Leftist Pollsters Can't Hide the Conservative Majority

Exit Poll for House Race (2010)

Giant Lines in Chinese Desert for Targeting

Even Kafka Would Be Scandalized at Obama Administration’s Effort To Banish References to God From Memorial to FDR

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

33 posted on 11/20/2011 1:43:47 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

well said...


34 posted on 11/20/2011 5:42:25 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

[ Great story. Underestimate Dr. Rice at your own risk. ]

What happens if you’ve hauled off and over-estimated her?..

You know..... BECAUSE SHE’S BLACK.. OR A WOMAN.. or a Rino..

True.. a female russian analyst is strange and a black one stranger still..
Most(not all) black people in this country are socialists.. and probably racists..
Hard to examine a 97+% percentage pro-Obama vote..

Only a few ways to explain it.. theres serious dysfunction there..


35 posted on 11/20/2011 5:58:08 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I kind of wish Cain talked to her instead of Henry the K.


36 posted on 11/20/2011 6:43:54 AM PST by Tribune7 (Perry, Cain or Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copwife

I am not certain whether it is even possible but I think you may have insulted Satan.


37 posted on 11/20/2011 6:54:56 AM PST by RipSawyer (This does not end well!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


38 posted on 11/20/2011 6:59:48 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: copwife

i’m not even sure satan is worse. i’d probably vote for him over obama, at least everyone one know what he’d be doing and it would be easier to counteract him


39 posted on 11/20/2011 11:41:08 AM PST by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem.


40 posted on 11/20/2011 5:52:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Oddly, Laura Welch Bush implied that she may have voted for Obama, as she is or was a Democrat.


41 posted on 11/20/2011 6:18:56 PM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Condi Rocks!


42 posted on 11/20/2011 6:20:53 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copwife

There is no difference between 000bama and Rmoney.


43 posted on 11/21/2011 5:28:01 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

LWB and GWB, two liberals married to each other.


44 posted on 11/21/2011 5:30:38 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I’m thinking judicial appointments. Whatever gets you through the night if obama wins. I guess it will salve your conscience when the country continues the slide obama and his cronies have begun.


45 posted on 11/21/2011 5:22:02 PM PST by copwife (All God's creatures have a place in the choir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

” Saddam Hussein put 400,000 of his own people in mass graves. Where is the humanitarian outrage about that?” Rice asked. “So those who believed there was a humanitarian reason for overthrowing Gadhafi, was there not a humanitarian reason for overthrowing Saddam Hussein?””

DUH....

Libya was freed by ØBOWMAO THE ISLAMO-MARXIST DEMOCRAP!

Iraq was INVADED by W, the JEW-LOVING, CHRISTIAN-FASCIST RETHUGLICAN.

/sarcasm off...


46 posted on 11/23/2011 12:17:37 AM PST by Yehuda (Land of the free, THANKS TO THE BRAVE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson