Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Defends (anti)Abortion (pro-life) Record
National Review ^ | 20 Nov 11 | Katrina Trinko

Posted on 11/20/2011 5:15:41 PM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last
To: xzins
“saving lives + working for change”

Pretty meaningless utterance, frankly.

121 posted on 11/21/2011 10:01:40 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

You say all this stuff, but you don’t explain yourself, so it makes it really easy to disregard.

Sorry I asked.


122 posted on 11/21/2011 10:11:04 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’ve explained it a number of times on this thread, but you refuse to listen. So, there’s not much I can do for you. Sorry.


123 posted on 11/21/2011 11:29:46 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: xzins

We ran the numbers on the proposed Iowa “fetal pain” legislation. It would have, theoretically, saved six babies.

But, in fact, it wouldn’t have saved them either. They would simply have been murdered a few days earlier.

And in exchange for that the “pro-life” Republicans get what? They get to sacrifice the most important sacred principles associated with their oath. They get to participate in the ongoing destruction of the cornerstone principles of our nation and our state. Hurrah!

But again, any argument over how many they save is a utilitarian argument, not a moral or a constitutional one.

And, none of it matters anyhow, because they give everything away every time with their commitment to judicial supremacism and their resulting abandonment of republican constitutional self-government with its critically important checks and balances.

They don’t care though. They’re getting what they want: fake credentials that will earn their organizations millions more in donations from naive, ignorant pro-lifers, and more votes for the morally-compromised formerly grand old party.


124 posted on 11/21/2011 11:39:33 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Let me ask you a question: If you have the power to pass legislation that is compromised, that ends with “and then you can kill the baby,” why not simply exercise that power to ban the practice of child-killing altogether?


125 posted on 11/21/2011 11:45:35 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson