Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain Camp Fundraises Off Old Poll
The Corner ^ | 11/26/2011 | Katrina Trinko

Posted on 11/27/2011 6:18:36 AM PST by TBBT

This morning the Cain campaign blasted out a fundraising e-mail that included these passages:

I am excited to share a recent Rasmussen (conducted November 21-22) which shows me retaking the lead nationally with 26 percent support. I am leading Governor Romney and Speaker Gingrich by 3 and 12 percent respectively. …

Please donate $25, $50, $100, $500, $1000 or more today to my campaign for President.

While I lead my fellow GOP candidates in the national polls, I trail them in one important category: Money.


A reader e-mailed me to point out that in fact, this particular Rasmussen poll was not conducted November 21-22, but November 2. Via Robert Stacy McCain, it appears that the mistake can be traced back to a confusing Newsmax story.

A Cain aide acknowledged the error, but regarding whether a correction or any other action would be taken, e-mailed, “We don’t plan any further action.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cain; fundraising; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Yeh... Why send out a correction? It can only serve to make you look more foolish - with a campaign team that already has a perception problem in terms of competency. Besides poll numbers drive donation, maybe they'll make a few extra bucks from it - before folks realize the truth.

Nothing like making up for shortcomings by surrounding yourself with the best people.

1 posted on 11/27/2011 6:18:43 AM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT
I like Cain - but I think he may be over his head for the job of president. No doubt he is way better than Obama, and I'd vote for him in a heartbeat but I think Newt is breaking out and is showing that he has the inspiration and know how of making a real impact rooted in conservative ideas.
2 posted on 11/27/2011 6:35:36 AM PST by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

“with a campaign team that already has a perception problem in terms of competency”

Well, they were competent enough to get their name on the Missouri ballot, unlike other candidates who missed the deadline and are out...


3 posted on 11/27/2011 6:37:00 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless & Inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958

“I think Newt is breaking out”

If you vote in Missouri, Newt is not in the race.


4 posted on 11/27/2011 6:41:33 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless & Inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Nothing makes anyone look as silly as slug Newts :

Amnesty

5 posted on 11/27/2011 6:44:10 AM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Ouch...


6 posted on 11/27/2011 6:47:39 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Ouch...


7 posted on 11/27/2011 6:48:04 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

I vote in Mo. & was told this year the primary is just a beauty contest & the caucus will be the decider. I know some delegates will be decided by the primary but for the life of me I can’t understand why the change. I guess it could get interesting.


8 posted on 11/27/2011 6:50:43 AM PST by PoplarBluffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

At least he isn’t running for the GOP nominaton using liberal-socialist policy proposals!


9 posted on 11/27/2011 6:50:48 AM PST by noprogs (Borders, Language, Culture....all should be preserved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
I guess this beats the news that Newt has been hurt by his Amnesty platform and that now he's getting good vocal vibes from Bill Clinton.

When Bill Clinton starts to say he likes a Candidate that doesn't bode well with this Conservative.

10 posted on 11/27/2011 7:04:38 AM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoplarBluffian

If it’s a beauty contest then maybe the pretty cowboy Perry will get the nod. Look, his logo looks like an Easter egg.


11 posted on 11/27/2011 7:05:09 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (bloodwashed not whitewashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: not2worry

But oh the RINOs will thrill that here is someone who “gets along well” with Democrats! When in truth, Democrats should be shown Republicans’ backsides until (and if ever) they get some semblance of sense back.


12 posted on 11/27/2011 7:06:53 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (bloodwashed not whitewashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Actually, I suspect the release of the polling numbers is pre-mature, but will end up being pretty close - considering Newt’s MELTDOWN on legalization of Illegals.


13 posted on 11/27/2011 7:17:32 AM PST by BobL ("Heartless" and "Inhumane" FReepers for Cain - we've HAD ENOUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
Nothing like making up for shortcomings by surrounding yourself with the best people.

This is the reason why none of the campaigns have taken off to beat Romney. They all, to the last, have hired some of the most incompetent untested, and selfish hacks in memory.

None of them, save Romney, has hired anyone who has the needed political business sense. Especially the only so called businessman, Cain.

14 posted on 11/27/2011 7:19:20 AM PST by Waywardson (Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958
I like Cain - but I think he may be over his head for the job of president.

I like him too. He's probably not over his head for the office if he could get in, but he's definitely getting a schooling on how dirty politics is.

15 posted on 11/27/2011 7:22:56 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I received that email and just figured the Cain folks were lying. Looks like that’s the case.


16 posted on 11/27/2011 7:29:06 AM PST by NCPAC ((GlobalRhetoric.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Oh snap!
17 posted on 11/27/2011 7:31:58 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Cain is not the one that called me "heartless" and "inhumane"! MERRY CHRISTMAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958
I don't agree that Cain is over his head for the job of president. He meets the qualifications and once in the position, has potential to do a better job than many of his predecessors. Clearly he is in over his head with respect to campaigning for the job but should this be a disqualification? If so, then we might as well resign ourselves to the fact that only the slickest, smoothest, establishment-backed candidates need apply for the job.

Remember that the "professional" campaign staffers, who make a career out of this sort of thing, tend to gravitate to the establishment-backed candidates. Thus, there are slim pickings for the "mavericks" out there, who must hire staffers who are not as experienced and seasoned.

Once can only imagine the complexity of building a national campaign operation on shoestring budget in a matter of weeks with amateurs. This is what Cain has been faced with since his campaign started catching fire a few weeks ago. Should Cain survive the next couple months and win an early primary or two, he should benefit by hiring experienced staffers from the campaigns of those who are forced to drop out. Should he get the nomination, he'll have all the necessary resources available to him that are currently engaged in other campaigns (Romney, Gingrich, Perry, etc.) as well as the full backing of the GOP. Thus a Cain general election campaign will have zero resemblance to "fly-by-seat-of-the-pants" operation we are witnessing currently.

18 posted on 11/27/2011 7:45:00 AM PST by SamAdams76 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mike_9958
I don't agree that Cain is over his head for the job of president. He meets the qualifications and once in the position, has potential to do a better job than many of his predecessors. Clearly he is in over his head with respect to campaigning for the job but should this be a disqualification? If so, then we might as well resign ourselves to the fact that only the slickest, smoothest, establishment-backed candidates need apply for the job.

Remember that the "professional" campaign staffers, who make a career out of this sort of thing, tend to gravitate to the establishment-backed candidates. Thus, there are slim pickings for the "mavericks" out there, who must hire staffers who are not as experienced and seasoned.

Once can only imagine the complexity of building a national campaign operation on shoestring budget in a matter of weeks with amateurs. This is what Cain has been faced with since his campaign started catching fire a few weeks ago. Should Cain survive the next couple months and win an early primary or two, he should benefit by hiring experienced staffers from the campaigns of those who are forced to drop out. Should he get the nomination, he'll have all the necessary resources available to him that are currently engaged in other campaigns (Romney, Gingrich, Perry, etc.) as well as the full backing of the GOP. Thus a Cain general election campaign will have zero resemblance to "fly-by-seat-of-the-pants" operation we are witnessing currently.

19 posted on 11/27/2011 7:49:32 AM PST by SamAdams76 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Isn’t that the truth? Newt’s lame excuse was saving the state fee for other important needs. The fee is only $1000...if that is too high then Newt has got him some real problems...LOL...


20 posted on 11/27/2011 7:54:08 AM PST by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson