Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ginger White, latest Herman Cain accuser: Who is she?
WaPo ^ | 112911 | Krissah Thompson and Sandhya Somashekhar,

Posted on 11/29/2011 5:51:20 PM PST by Fred

The woman whose accusations may have prompted Herman Cain to reassess his campaign for president is a 46-year-old single mother of two grown children. Ginger White, who has worked as a fitness instructor, alleges that she carried on a 13-year affair with Cain.

In two television interviews with Atlanta stations, she appeared soft-spoken and said she came forward only to defend her reputation after she feared the story would leak out. Cain has emphatically denied the affair, calling White a “destitute” friend whom he tried to help. “I couldn’t imagine anyone coming out and lying about this. Who would want this? It’s really not been fun,” White told Atlanta television station WSB outside her apartment Monday.

White has been frequently unemployed, according to news reports, and public records reveal financial difficulties that resulted in several eviction notices.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anitahill; cain; cainaffair; gingerwhite; johnwhite; kimberlyvay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-89 last
To: Never on my watch

” For a significant portion of the last thirteen years Mr. Cain was suffering from stage 4 cancer. “

Cain was diagnosed in 2006 , had surgery and completed his last round of chemo in January 2007.


51 posted on 11/29/2011 7:32:07 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Has anyone noticed she has not said that she had a sexual affair. Why is everyone assuming that the affair was about sex?


52 posted on 11/29/2011 7:44:07 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Ann Coulter was right: this pattern looks like it has David Axelrod’s fingerprints all over it.
________________________________________________________

Do you remember the media puff piece they did about Axelrod and his disabled daughter? Now, I’m not getting at the fact about his daughter’s condition, and I wish her the best....just curious as to why it was reported on THEN....and not before, especially during 2008 and right after the election when the ‘worship’ was at it’s peak.

What I’m getting at is Democraps ALWAYS exploit a situation for political purposes. It’s almost like the media was trying to supplant.....”Oh, that David Axelrod wouldn’t hurt a FLY. He has a disabled daughter, you know.”

Am I cynical and jaded? YES. We’re talking about liberals, here.


53 posted on 11/29/2011 7:46:57 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Good catch.

The more I think about Coulter’s analysis, the more I think she is spot on. Now, it may be that something will eventually come out about Cain that is true, if the Rats keep at it long enough. But the fact remains that the Chicago Way has been used to derail (or try to derail - we’ll see) a GOP candidate with lies and innuendo, the worst kind of politics of destruction.

Never mind that Cain may have other problems with his campaign. (Who knows, really, how well he would have done had he not this horrible attack to distract him.)

As I said previously, this makes me want to donate to Cain to keep him in the race as long as possible. I’d pay money to fight back against the Chicago Way.


54 posted on 11/29/2011 7:55:27 PM PST by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Fred

As soon as Herman Cain secumbs and drops out of the race, these women (er golddiggers) will suddenly crawl back out under the rocks (er tenaments) where David Axelrod found them (er was dragging $100 bills).

Just got a phone robocall inviting me to Herman Cain rally at Dayton, OH Mariott tomorrow.


55 posted on 11/29/2011 8:07:41 PM PST by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Go, Cain. Yep, he’s going! His better half prolly whupin him side his head with a rolling pin.

60 text messages in 2 months, maybe Rick or Newt hacked into his phone and made all those texts.


56 posted on 11/29/2011 8:20:22 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

And what will it do to this phlegm-fest when Gloria tells the world that many of the text or other phone contacts were with her speaking to this delusional woman? ...


57 posted on 11/29/2011 8:22:55 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Seems like one of these “women” would accuse Cain of kicking a dog or pulling the wings off a butterfly. Anything to break up the monotony of “sex this, sex that, sex the-other-thing.”


58 posted on 11/29/2011 8:23:15 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (The instinct toward liberalism is located in the part of the brain called the rectal lobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Oh, and try not to give yourself away too quickly, n00b.


59 posted on 11/29/2011 8:23:55 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

You seem to forget that the left believes conservatives are obsessed with sex. It goes along with the guns and Bibles don’tchaknow.


60 posted on 11/29/2011 8:26:24 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Am I cynical and jaded? YES. We’re talking about liberals, here.

Are you cynical and jaded? NO! You are being realistic. We're talking about liberals, here.

61 posted on 11/29/2011 8:34:03 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (The instinct toward liberalism is located in the part of the brain called the rectal lobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: All

Damn at least you would think they could have brought out a decent looking lady by now.

Compared to his wife these accuser are nothing but skank azz hos.


62 posted on 11/29/2011 8:34:49 PM PST by Bailee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinOfKingston

Well, there ya’ go! Hehehe!


63 posted on 11/29/2011 8:37:14 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (A MUST WATCH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KeOLurcQaqI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Now that sounds like some fine fiction writing. If Gloria Cain were to actually say that, then I would think twice, but then again, If a frog had wings, he wouldn’t bust his butt everytime he jumped.

My guess is that Gloria Cain is mortally embarrassed and not happy to have been put in this position of a proven fool in front of the whole world.

Look, like many others, started out favoring Palin, then Perry. When Cain caught attention, he caught my eye, because he sounded too good to be true. Now it looks like Cain re-proved the axium, if something sounds too good to eb true, it usually is.


64 posted on 11/29/2011 8:38:37 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fred

I find interesting two mainstream media outlets have publish some not so flattering stories about Cains accusers. Earlier we had ABC paint an ugle picture of Sharon Bialek and now we got the ComPost on Ginger White.


65 posted on 11/29/2011 8:44:44 PM PST by GR_Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Don’t try to be a 3rd grade bully, ButtHead. Having been around the block a time or two, I don’t suffer fools lightly.

Looks like all you Cain groupies will have to find another train to hop on. Maybe ronpaul.

Cain brought ALL this stuff on himself. Even his “Billy badass lawyer” couldn’t figure a way to poopoo this one.


66 posted on 11/29/2011 8:45:52 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

I doubt a person with your choice of alias was ever “for” any of the people you listed. Bless your little pea pickin’ heart, though.


67 posted on 11/29/2011 8:45:55 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Bevis is at FR for an agenda, nothing more. we have several recent sign-ups doing the same verminous posting on any of the politically focused threads. Either Romney workers or obamanoids. I suspect this one is too stupid to be and Romneybot. The thuggish nature of it’s posts smack of axelgreasy hiree.


68 posted on 11/29/2011 8:54:53 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thank you. Not many peas to pick this year.
Actually, the handle was more of a reflective jab at many we see here sometimes.

I would not be re-naming myself Nostradamus, if I were you. Your “ESP vision” misses the mark.

Have a great evening my FRiend.


69 posted on 11/29/2011 8:54:53 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
troll..

Soros or Axlrod paying you?? you sign up Nov. 2011 just to spread dirt..your not welcome...

70 posted on 11/29/2011 8:56:56 PM PST by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Oh I see now.....YOU are one of the 25% that polls say “strongly approve” of the job Obama is doing.


71 posted on 11/29/2011 9:02:09 PM PST by lilyramone (The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: haircutter

And you are who? Someone in authority? Now I’m so scared.


72 posted on 11/29/2011 9:04:33 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: lilyramone

Yep, you be seein about as well as another recent mind-reader.

Would say that July 20 2011 normally notes a noob too, but I won’t be rude and say something childish.


73 posted on 11/29/2011 9:08:58 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Looks like all you Cain groupies will have to find another train to hop on. Maybe ronpaul.

That comment demonstrates that what he/she/it know about various conservative factions is "nothing," which tells me its trips around the block have been few, and have never been in conservative neighborhoods. But its comment about hopping on trains is pretty amusing given its admission - claim- that it's hopped a lot of trains in this primary season, from one candidate to the next. Note in its listing it carefully left out the one liberals like the most, which is apparently something the trolls are drilled to do in their Alinsky "Divide and Conquer" 101 class.

74 posted on 11/29/2011 9:09:19 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Herman Cain obviously knew this woman was broke, and vulnerable. In he rides on his white horse, money in hand, to “help” her out, give her advice, and get laid all at the same time. He said himself that he was helping her financially, so he knew she was on hard times. Don’t know why the defenders of Cain use this woman’s bad financial condition as if it is a strike against her, when it was equally a strike against Cain, as he was the one financing her, for some reason. Guess what that reason might have been?


75 posted on 11/29/2011 9:25:09 PM PST by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Newby.

Please.

Of all the women that accused him, 2 wouldn’t even reveal their name, one said she felt ‘uncomfortable’ that Cain was talking about some other women in a way that was maybe-sort of not kind of possibly appropriate, one works at the Obama Treasury dept and won’t give details, and the last two are grifters with history of filing bogus harassment cases, stalking, and seriously checkered backgrounds.

So far NONE of them has any substantiation. It’s pure rumor and shadow games. And YOU fell for it. And I’m supposed to be convinced by some newby, pantywaste, puke-cannon, weak-kneed weasel who is completely sucked in to these cheap political gutter tactics?

Your intellectual illegitimacy is showing, newby.


76 posted on 11/29/2011 9:29:19 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Proof can be posted at any time.


77 posted on 11/29/2011 9:31:40 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
60 text messages in 2 months... how many text messages - and when - before that? When did this whole Cain attack first begin? approximately 2 months ago... She likely contacted him out of the blue with new problems - at the suggestion of someone who could make it worth her while... 60 text messages between them in 2 months... I would say the average text message session is maybe 30 back and forth - 15 each. Tie this in with the Chicago connection, and the fact all of these women are from the NRA - you have a tried and true dem operation... Newt is my candidate but anyone who allows this to succeed against Cain or fails to defend him - is just stupid and doing the media and barack's bidding.
78 posted on 11/30/2011 1:34:37 AM PST by true believer forever (First, they came for the rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Oldie. What does newby or oldies have to do with the scheme of things? NOTHING! Truth be known I probably have some years and experience on you, which also means zero substantive in the Cain situation.

From a personal attack standpoint your “showed you ass” as they say. Some of Cain supporters would do him a better service to quit the “hot pants groupie” act and remember our previous Conservative Morality.

Not one poster on FR, you nor I, have any facts regarding the original allegations or the facts on this most recent alleged dalliance, its 100% conjecture.

What is evident is his lawyer was very careful with the words in his statements and that is very telling. Lawyers, especially big shot ones, are wordsmiths and do not utter a single word off the cuff. Unless we are also lawyers, we have no real way to know what he “actually” meant on the first 4 or the 13 year affair, reminiscent of “what the meaning of IS is”.

It is 1000% OK for Cain followers to stick with him and if he comes out of all this on top, I will be one of the first to cheer for him, but what I know of human nature and of similar “opportunity” situations with the ladies, I do think there is more than anyone who actually knows the facts is admitting.

Closing your eyes and whistling past the graveyard is really not good for you or for Cain.

In the current GOP primary situation, I have now focused more on Newt, even with his warts, but I am still not closed minded about Mr. Cain.

79 posted on 11/30/2011 7:23:09 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

So, bearing false witness is now your schtick. Fits your past posting spittle quite well. Sadly, you will have one or two here who will gladly join in the bearing false witness. You serve your father, as you slither along in his shadow ... the father of lies, of course.


80 posted on 11/30/2011 7:23:46 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
One of the best truisms ever is, “the simplest explanation is often the best”.

Too much speculation is never going to resolve one issue.

81 posted on 11/30/2011 7:26:39 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
Oldie. What does newby or oldies have to do with the scheme of things? NOTHING! Truth be known I probably have some years and experience on you, which also means zero substantive in the Cain situation.

Let's see, you say being a newby or oldie means nothing, then in the next sentence go on to tell us that you likely have more experience than me, which I will gladly, on your cue, take to mean NOTHING. Being an 'oldie' here means something because the longer one is here the less likely there is an axe to grind as the posting history will tell what kind of person they are, quickly.

Bottom line is, I could care if you've drawn breath for 5 or 105 years. Existing on this earth gives your opinions no weight than anyone else if you don't know a damn thing about what you speak.

From a personal attack standpoint your “showed you ass” as they say. Some of Cain supporters would do him a better service to quit the “hot pants groupie” act and remember our previous Conservative Morality.

There no 'showing of my ass' here, just you being an a-hole trying to push these women's slander as proof, when no proof as yet has been shown. Calling a spade a spade isn't groupie behavior, it's fact.

Not one poster on FR, you nor I, have any facts regarding the original allegations or the facts on this most recent alleged dalliance, its 100% conjecture.

No, YOUR statements are 100% conjecture. What I stated to you is fact - none of these women have provided credible evidence of what happened, two of them won't even give their names. Quit trying to shade this as if I've made statements that were never made.

What is evident is his lawyer was very careful with the words in his statements and that is very telling. Lawyers, especially big shot ones, are wordsmiths and do not utter a single word off the cuff. Unless we are also lawyers, we have no real way to know what he “actually” meant on the first 4 or the 13 year affair, reminiscent of “what the meaning of IS is”.

Ms. White's lawyers have offered up just as much wordsmithing, and Ms. White has obviously been very well coached, not only by what she says but by what she does NOT say. She leaves alot to speculate about, just like the other ones did, but no proof, which she seems to back away from. Just like the others did, which smells like an orchestrated shadow game.

It is 1000% OK for Cain followers to stick with him and if he comes out of all this on top, I will be one of the first to cheer for him, but what I know of human nature and of similar “opportunity” situations with the ladies, I do think there is more than anyone who actually knows the facts is admitting.

Closing your eyes and whistling past the graveyard is really not good for you or for Cain.

Whistling past what graveyard? THERE IS NO PROOF. This is the SIXTH woman to come out and make all sorts of noise, but in the end there's not 'there there'. When there is something there and we all choose to ignore it, then you have a point. It sounds to me like you've come to a predetermined conclusion and tried to make it look like you were forced into it by Cain's actions, then come onto this forum to try and persuade others to do the same.

Quit wasting our time with crap till you have something.

82 posted on 11/30/2011 10:49:00 AM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Your tagline is one of the very best I've seen at FR! ... That rant was darn good, too. And spot on to boot! Don't ya just love the n00bs signing onto Freerepublic to tell conservatives what to think, how to perceive the fabricated crud, and whom to not vote for? And this election season has two devilish sources for this crud, the disgruntled Romney hacks who were zotted and have come to take their revenge, AND the axelgreasy spittlists working to divide and suppress conservative turnout and opposition to the anti-Americans barry bassturd.
83 posted on 11/30/2011 5:11:12 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Although you unintentionally continue to reinforce my points.
Thank you so much for your sageness.

Look, I am by no means against Cain. I do not care for the way he, his campaign staff and his hotshot lawyer have conducted the klintoon style defense. If Cain's supporters have no problem with that, then that is your prerogative.

My primary contention is that whether or not any of these multiple allegations prove out, he is no longer as likely to win the nomination, to which many polls indicate. But if he does, I will wholeheartedly support him against nobama.

84 posted on 11/30/2011 7:48:06 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

“Look, I am by no means against Cain. I do not care for the way he,....”

Where’s the “Blue Dress”? What did the Text Messages “say”. Where’s the video? So far nothing.


85 posted on 11/30/2011 9:34:49 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

I reinforce your points only in your deluded mind.

I have laid out the facts as simple as they can be: every single one of the accusers against Cain are seriously flawed. Of the ones that will even give their names and/or what actually happened, they have serious cracks in their credibility. That is not conjecture or wishful thinking - that is fact.

Your primary contention since entering this thread seems to be running with fabrications from grifter sleazebag women and acting as if they are true in order to get others to doubt and possibly switch to some other candidate, and paint everyone who resists you as some kind of kool-aid drinking true believer.

Nice try, no cigar. I’ve been in politics too long to get fooled by provocateur amateur hour.


86 posted on 11/30/2011 10:57:48 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Thanks! I have a buddy who lives on a few hours sleep and always says ‘I’ll sleep when I’m dead’. Thought of him saying that one day and it popped into my mind ‘and vote Democrat too’ - and a tagline was born.

It’s amazing sometimes to sit back and watch how people work the threads. The noobs are the best though because they rarely even have half the skill they think they do. You’d think they’d realize that those of us who have been here 10+ years have been thru a few rodeos.


87 posted on 11/30/2011 11:07:23 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
With some of these n00bs, I suspect their employer sent them with a list of 'to do' items and they're merely playing out their deceit. I got a freepmail this morning which asked 'does your mother know you use language like that' veering off from a thread more than a wekk old, in response to my highlighting that the n00b was trying to sow ill will and posting dissonance. There was not one off color word in my postings. The n00bs, some of them, are here to invite freepers to the DNC/Romney circular firing squads.
88 posted on 12/01/2011 7:24:49 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

RIGHT!!! s/


89 posted on 12/01/2011 8:41:56 AM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-89 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson