Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seattle Welfare Recipient lives in Million Dollar Home
nwcn.com ^ | December 2, 2011 | Chris Ingels

Posted on 12/03/2011 6:57:25 PM PST by MamaDearest

SEATTLE -- She lives in a beautiful waterfront home on Seattle’s Lake Washington. Yet, she's on welfare assistance.

  This week federal agents moved in to put a stop to it. They raided her south Lake Washington home armed with a search warrant.

  KING 5 News is not naming the woman or her husband because they have not been criminally charged.

  Search warrant documents unsealed Friday in federal court reveal that she received more than $1,200 a month in public housing vouchers, plus monthly cash from the federal and state government for a disability, as well as food stamps.

  Property records show the woman lives in a 2,500 square-foot home, with gardens and a boat dock, that is valued at $1.2 million.

  Records show she has received welfare benefits while living in the plush home since 2003. Records also show she truthfully provided her address when she applied for benefits. 

  How could the government allow housing subsidy dollars to someone who openly lives in one of Seattle’s most desirable neighborhoods?

  A federal official spoke to KING 5 News on condition of anonymity. He says the housing voucher program provides coupons that help low-income people pay their rent. He says it allows people to get out of housing projects and move into the place of their choosing. However, he says a “flaw” is that the program doesn’t analyze where people are living, even if it is at a ritzy address that should raise a red flag.

  Court records show the couple gave money to charities and traveled around the world to exotic places like Turkey, Tel Aviv and resort towns in Mexico.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: class; crime; economy; home; seattle; wealth; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2011 6:57:29 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
Records will probably also show that she voted for The Messiah 37 times in 2008.....

Stay tuned.....

2 posted on 12/03/2011 7:01:11 PM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Taxes should NOT be raised on anyone, rich or otherwise, until government quits wasting our tax money through bogus spending, wasteful social programs, and extremely poor accountability.


3 posted on 12/03/2011 7:01:45 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
Yes, what we need to do is to elect career politicians, they are the only ones that can understand and fix the problems. Just frigging damn.
4 posted on 12/03/2011 7:02:09 PM PST by org.whodat (Just another heartless American, hated by "AMNESTY" Newt, Willard, Perry and his fellow supporters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Who cares? It’s Obama’s Stash ... not like it’s our money / Sarcasm!!!!!

TT


5 posted on 12/03/2011 7:02:26 PM PST by TexasTransplant (Radical islam is real islam. Moderate islam is the trojan horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Wanna put the brakes on this kind of thing?
Try this....

(document presented in language of applicant).....Public Assistance Implementation and Usage Contract.

This contract, entered into on (date) and expiring on (18 months from implementation date) by the (state agency) and applicant(s) listed herein (must submit names of applicant and children born to her via birth records),allows for the provision of food,housing allowance,child care and education for the purposes of job placement during the contract period,and is understood by all parties concerned that the provision of aforementioned assistance is on a one-time basis,not to be repeated or reinstated at any time for any reason between the applicant(s) and the agency named herein,and is for the aforementioned time period only,and can only be implemented following presentation of documents proving legal citizenship status and a drug screening process,both of which are to be conducted by the agency.

Once legal citizenship status and drug screen results are known by the agency and the applicant and found to be favorable,this contract can then be implemented.The following covenants hereby apply and are agreed upon by both the named agency herein and the applicant(s) seeking assistance (failure of any one of these covenants will be considered a contract breach on the part of the applicant,and will result in immediate termination of the contract;assistance will be terminated immediately and can never be reinstated at any time in the future for any reason:

Applicant MUST disclose the name(s) of the absent parent of applicant’s child/children so that an attempt to obtain monetary support for those children can be made through DNA analysis. Failure to disclose the absent parent’s name will result in automatic immediate cessation of benefits.

applicant will submit to random home visits which will be unannounced and will occur during the 5-day work week,normally during the early afternoon hours;

applicant will submit to random drug testing as directed by the agency;

applicant must not conceive,adopt (formally or informally,including family members,immediate or extended) marry or cohabitate during the contract period;

applicant must attend a one-year vocational program via a voucher provided by the agency;applicant must attend each class ( two absences will be allowed during the contract period and a doctor’s note must be submitted upon returning to class for each absence) and a transportation voucher will be provided by the agency for transportation during class hours;child care will be provided by the agency during class hours only.

Once applicant graduates from vocational training, a two-month job-placement period will commence,with child care provided by the agency; Upon applicant’s employment,there will be an additional 4 months of ongoing assistance to allow applicant enough time to establish themselves in their occupation and to make child-care arrangements for after the contract period.

Once this contract has reached its expiration date,the assistance provided,all provisions and covenants and financial considerations as well,will cease and terminate permanently.The applicant is barred from any and all future assistance.

I,________________ hereby agree to adhere to all covenants,rules,etc of this contract. I realize and fully understand that I am bound by this contract in order to receive assistance in any form,and that any violation or breach will result in my not receiving any form of assistance any further. I agree further that this contract was fully explained to me by the agency caseworker and that I will fully comply. (sign & date here)____________________________

Agency hereby agrees to and will implement to the best of its ability and obligations,all covenants of this contract.

(agency sign & date)_______________________


6 posted on 12/03/2011 7:02:52 PM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

She probably wasn’t even breaking any rules... lol. Plus if you won a million bucks in the lottery, its not considered ‘income’ and you can still get food stamps and stuff.


7 posted on 12/03/2011 7:04:17 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

A 99 percenter grabs onto the “american dream”. LOL! Woo! Hoo! Suckers!!! And I can say, that it is only going to get worse. Believe me.


8 posted on 12/03/2011 7:04:56 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Stop BIG Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Bet she drives a late model luxury car too. $1200 a month welfare can buy a pretty nice ride.


9 posted on 12/03/2011 7:11:42 PM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

CLose enough to hobnob with Bill Gates on the estate. What the state giveth the state taketh away. Hope she had her fun but the stolen dream ends here. Pay it back now.


10 posted on 12/03/2011 7:13:44 PM PST by tflabo (Restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Just the tip of the entitlement iceberg. Multiply this story by a couple million more welfare cheats at least and you start to get the picture why our country is sinking fast.


11 posted on 12/03/2011 7:20:53 PM PST by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

that’s a nice address, Lake washington

people have no shame anymore


12 posted on 12/03/2011 7:23:37 PM PST by preamble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Records will probably also show that she voted for The Messiah 37 times in 2008.....

Liberal Seattle, like Portland and San Francisco. If fraud was eliminated from federal give-aways programs, it's likely multiple billions would be recovered, no new taxes required.

2008 Washington Presidential results by precinct

Snip: Seattle city - Obama 84.67% McCain 13.87%

13 posted on 12/03/2011 7:27:05 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Registered Democrat, no doubt.


14 posted on 12/03/2011 7:43:59 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Mrs. Van Jones?


15 posted on 12/03/2011 7:47:26 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

So she got to live there rent free?


16 posted on 12/03/2011 7:54:24 PM PST by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest; Just Lori; Libertina; Lexinom; horatio; freebird5850; Horatio Gates; Ramius; ...
WA Ping

No surprise to me...

17 posted on 12/03/2011 7:54:24 PM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gimme1ibertee
applicant must not conceive,adopt (formally or informally,including family members,immediate or extended) marry or cohabitate during the contract period;

Combined incomes (with none of the democrat "marriage stigma") give some of these "social program recipients" a very good life indeed.

18 posted on 12/03/2011 8:02:20 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

One of ‘Holder’s people’?


19 posted on 12/03/2011 8:03:22 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero est un espece de merde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
"If fraud was eliminated from federal give-aways programs, it's likely multiple billions would be recovered, no new taxes required."

Scamming government is a big BIG industry. When the whole nation sees graft, corruption, embezzlement and crony capitalism pervade the system from top to bottom, the temptations are hard to resist.

20 posted on 12/03/2011 8:03:53 PM PST by Baynative (The penalty for not participating in politics is you will be governed by your inferiors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Seems to me a certain dem governor benefited from the unusual recount rules in WA.

The 2008 voting results are indicative of just one reason I don’t live in WA.


21 posted on 12/03/2011 8:05:51 PM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

of course she does.


22 posted on 12/03/2011 8:05:59 PM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Maybe she was running out of time to meet with the rest of the board, couldn’t get to her bank soon enough, and stopped by the welfare office, instead. Seeing who she was, they just gave her the vouchers, cards, etc.

;-)


23 posted on 12/03/2011 8:08:02 PM PST by familyop ("Don't worry, they'll row for a month before they figure out I'm fakin' it." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Sounds like a Philadelphia school teacher.


24 posted on 12/03/2011 8:08:48 PM PST by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
He says the housing voucher program provides coupons that help low-income people pay their rent. He says it allows people to get out of housing projects and move into the place of their choosing.

Nice choice, honey! I'd say this program works pretty damn well! A bit TOO well.

25 posted on 12/03/2011 8:13:27 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

There is a 100% chance that these people are democrats


26 posted on 12/03/2011 8:13:43 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Go Steelers (what's the baseball team called again?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
You mean a former Philadelphia School Superintendent
27 posted on 12/03/2011 8:13:43 PM PST by Tribune7 (Perry or Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Typical democrat party social parasite.

I would point out that Bill Gates lives on Lake Washington.


28 posted on 12/03/2011 8:16:07 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

bookmark


29 posted on 12/03/2011 8:17:14 PM PST by GOP Poet (Time for Bambi and his commie crew to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: From The Deer Stand

Exactly, it is disgraceful how these asshats waste OUR money then chastise us for not paying “our fair share” ... Getting very old


30 posted on 12/03/2011 8:17:23 PM PST by DirtyDawg (eat fruit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

“One of ‘Holder’s people’?”

Not visiting Tel Aviv.


31 posted on 12/03/2011 8:18:23 PM PST by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Yep.


32 posted on 12/03/2011 8:19:23 PM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

A ritzy place like this would need more than a welfare means to keep up — she’s got to have either more income under the table, or substantial savings (I don’t think welfare looks at IRAs or 401(k)s).

How this situation can’t stink even to Rat Hell, I don’t know. Wouldn’t even Rats know that events of this kind will endanger their base?


33 posted on 12/03/2011 8:34:49 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Whoa... after reading this, I started thinking, “Hey, wait a minute...” Two people living together, maybe have kids together, but aren’t married. Couldn’t a “stay at home” mom technically apply for welfare? She’s not bringing in any income, right?


34 posted on 12/03/2011 8:54:15 PM PST by ponygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

They visited Tel Aviv. Hmmm, wonder who they voted for.

But...the Dems can’t cut spending.


35 posted on 12/03/2011 9:11:50 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Day in and day out people say for their food with food stamps, & then they are able to buy beer, cigarettes, food for their pets, etc. No wonder they can also live in great houses.


36 posted on 12/03/2011 9:42:49 PM PST by Texas Gal (Yay shariah. It's as great as diarrhea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

People in TX have been taking advantage of a obscure law called adverse possion, which gives squatters the right to purchase the house they have been staying it for $16. There are a lot of empty bank owned homes that are potential targets. Sheriffs and their deputies have increased efforts to roust these low lifes and arrest them for trespassing (and anything else they can stick them with.


37 posted on 12/03/2011 9:56:12 PM PST by Nachoman (I HOPE we CHANGE presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Gal
Day in and day out people say for their food with food stamps, & then they are able to buy beer, cigarettes, food for their pets, etc. No wonder they can also live in great houses.

They also have ATVs, snowmobiles, boats, huge pole barns and spendy vehicles. They see the latest movies and fuel money for the vehicles seems to be no problem.

The powers that be in their infinite wisdom seem to be incapable of policing exactly who is truly "disabled" or "entitled." There are people truly needy, but lawyers and the government have partnered up to include everyone so that no one is stigmatized except the taxpayer who is fleeced for every penny of it including government salaries and legal fees.

If they can do it for OSHA fraud, why not welfare and disability income fraud???????

38 posted on 12/03/2011 9:59:23 PM PST by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

It doesn’t say how old she was, whether its financed by a mortgage or paid for and whether she reported all her income to the government. Only if she concealed income would it be a matter for criminal charges to be laid and that would be for not paying taxes on it. Food stamps don’t qualify as income.


39 posted on 12/03/2011 10:28:08 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Food stamps are not to be used for anything but buying food. Any other use of them is fraud.


40 posted on 12/03/2011 10:30:15 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Living in a high end neighborhood is not exactly a crime. If she bought the home with public housing vouchers - and truthfully reported where she was living, the feds and state government don’t have a legal leg to stand on. If it was legal to buy her home and no one objected, they can’t say she broke the rules now.


41 posted on 12/03/2011 10:35:48 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
hey my sil married to my bil BOTH got themselves on Ss disability....they got their precious handicapped parking pass...they get their meds paid for in part...they even have a friend who brings them "extra" food bank stuffs, like they need it....

they travel...gamble...infact my bil plays poker every single day...

they own two homes, an extra lot, 10 acres in the country, and TWO sports cars.... along with their regular vehicles...

yep.....the "poor"....

42 posted on 12/03/2011 11:02:59 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
However, he says a “flaw” is that the program doesn’t analyze where people are living, even if it is at a ritzy address that should raise a red flag.

The flaw is it brings ghetto behavior into neighborhoods where people work hard to live.

43 posted on 12/03/2011 11:28:40 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The flaw is it brings ghetto behavior into neighborhoods where people work hard to live.

megabump


44 posted on 12/04/2011 2:16:01 AM PST by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman
People in TX have been taking advantage of a obscure law called adverse possion, which gives squatters the right to purchase the house they have been staying it for $16.

Wow. Can you give more information about that?

I'm not a lawyer, but I do have experience with adverse possession law in another state (not TX).

Adverse possession requires use and possession of the property for a long time, ranging from 5 yrs - 25+ yrs depending on the state.

Additionally state laws that I'm aware of have other conditions that must be met, before title to property can be transferred under adverse possession doctrine. I.e. you cannot get a "right" to the property simply by squatting for a few weeks or months. You also get no right to it if you're paying rent and/or have permission of the owner.

45 posted on 12/04/2011 3:40:57 AM PST by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
My guess is this woman has a "boyfriend."

An older man, likely, maybe a widower. They probably use his funds to jet off to Tel Aviv, etc. Maybe they do not technically cohabit (which presumably would be disallowed by the terms of the state assistance?).

The article says she gets "disability" income. If she has no other income and no assets I guess she qualifies for food stamps.

What is harder to understand is how the state is willing to pay $1200 in "housing vouchers" for a single(?) woman. Is $1200 a typical rent for one person in WA state?

46 posted on 12/04/2011 3:49:13 AM PST by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

So basically, this woman acted as every politician in Washington has acted and for roughly the same amount of time, When will their homes be raided?


47 posted on 12/04/2011 4:06:20 AM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Nothing unusual here, simply our quota selected government employees doing their jobs, and I will bet they feel good about themselves.

Typical waste.


48 posted on 12/04/2011 4:47:58 AM PST by Evergolightly (Ones conclusions are founded in the path traveled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest
KING 5 News is not naming the woman...

I wonder if it could be Patty Murray?

49 posted on 12/04/2011 6:36:24 AM PST by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Again, wrong target is set up to shoot at. If the gov wants to give you money, why turn it down (not my feelings, but feeling of most I fear). The target should be the person who LET THIS HAPPEN. Some bureaucrat in some office wasn’t doing their job ... they should be fired and fined for the money that went to these people, jail time and fines would have a way of keeping it from happening again, and again and again as is the case now. Time to start going after the ROOT CAUSES of these kinds of problems in society, not the “results” as set up in media headlines.


50 posted on 12/04/2011 7:19:12 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson