Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Herman Cain, the GOP’s black friend: How he's come undone (Crouch gets his Farrakhan on)
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS ^ | Monday, December 5 2011 | Stanley Crouch

Posted on 12/05/2011 10:46:31 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: x
Stanley wants to lie in wait for a Black man coming down the road,

He may not have to wait very long. Gingrich has already mentioned Allen West as a potential running mate.

21 posted on 12/05/2011 4:42:41 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
And make no mistake about it, HE is the number one black thinker around here, not this Herman guy.

Probably because he's not smart enough to understand what Thomas Sowell has been saying for the past 40 or so years.

22 posted on 12/05/2011 4:45:51 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Geesh. Nice stream of so-called thought.


23 posted on 12/05/2011 4:47:03 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Except that he didn’t have an affair with her, and he didn’t harrass anyone, and he didn’t lie about any of it, or anything else, because he isn’t a liar.

The stake in the heart was when it came out he did not tell Gloria about Ginger-snap. She was blindsided about this one, and it broke his back. He lied to her, by omission.

24 posted on 12/05/2011 4:50:54 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

You tell yourself whatever it is you have to to justify the destruction of an innocent man by false accusations.

For you, it’s because he didn’t tell her.

For others, it’s the Lybia answer.

For even others, it’s because he was never serious.

But for no one was it because the allegations were true, any of them.

The stake in the heart was when conservatives sold their souls.

Herman is still alive, and he’ll do just fine.

For the rest of you...time will tell, won’t it...


25 posted on 12/05/2011 5:05:50 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chris37
You tell yourself...

I got that far. You are not me, you have no clue about me, and you're the expert, all of a sudden, about me.

26 posted on 12/05/2011 5:17:21 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Oh yes I do have a clue about you. I got it right here-

“The stake in the heart was when it came out he did not tell Gloria about Ginger-snap. She was blindsided about this one, and it broke his back. He lied to her, by omission.”

I remember the head line now:

-Herman Cain accused of financial aid to a woman without telling his wife.-

Anyhow, good luck to you, and see you at The Fall.


27 posted on 12/05/2011 5:32:28 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Yes. He did lie. Thanks for the quote. I sure wish he hadn’t lied to his wife (proven, not media lies). He would have been good. Too bad he wasn’t ready for prime time.


28 posted on 12/05/2011 5:38:51 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

I never said he lied, you did.

I guess his heart is too big to be president though, what with how picky we are and all. I guess I’ll go support the adulterer now, not.

You don’t defeat the devil by selling your soul.


29 posted on 12/05/2011 5:45:58 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

That is true for all of us who fall into mindless collectives...dancing to elitists’ tunes of the world instead of being the salt of the earth the way we were meant to be.

There is no real meaning in our skins. It’s just a way the elite use to move us into group-think; divide and conquer us. I had hoped Americans were moving beyond this condition of false race meaning but the Liberal elite love the power of race division too much to ever let it go. I am so sick of it.


30 posted on 12/05/2011 6:02:21 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chris37
I never said he lied, you did.

That is correct, I said he lied. So did Cain when he admitted lying to his wife (by omission, a lie is still a lie) for years about his relationship with someone we now know is a hooker.

If you are married, it's a simple test: If you tell you spouse everything, would she/he shoot you? We now know how he came down with his decision: He lied about it. He knew the hooker was out there when blood was first dumped into the water with the other bimbo eruptions, yet he continued, only to eventually be exposed. It's good for the GOP it happened when it did.

31 posted on 12/06/2011 5:14:22 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Here ya go- lie 1    [lahy] Show IPA noun, verb, lied, ly·ing. noun 1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood. 2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one. 3. an inaccurate or false statement. 4. the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers. verb (used without object) 5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive. 6. to express what is false; convey a false impression. Like I told you before, but you refused to read, tell yourself whatver you have to to justify allowing a good man to be destroyed BY A BUNCH OF LIARS, REAL liars, not your tortured definition. Dunno what else to tell you other than follow the lemmings marching over the cliff. Have fun, goodbye.
32 posted on 12/06/2011 8:27:08 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chris37

That was the biggest non-sequitur I’ve seen in a while. You didn’t need to fetch a dictionary to look up lying for me to know Cain lied. There’s nothing tortured about my definition. Next thing you’ll probably want to do is explain what the definition of “is” is.

We’re better than Democrats because we don’t tolerate liars and cheats in our mist. If you want to be like the Dems, you go right on ahead. If you want to call me a lemming for insisting on some truthfulness, you go right on ahead with that too.

I don’t care what you think, just don’t expect me to join you.


33 posted on 12/06/2011 9:17:52 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Oh yes, you do tolerate liars and cheats.

You have one as your frontrunner, and you deserve him.

And don’t expect me to join you, I refuse to be a hypocrite. The right is so utterly lost, it’s not even funny.


34 posted on 12/06/2011 9:52:39 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Believe it or not, I mostly agree with you...and every candidate we've seen so far is fatally flawed in some way. That's why I don't have a dog in the hunt at this time.

You have one as your frontrunner, and you deserve him.

I don't believe I ever said I was a Gingrich man, but you sure do a nice job of trying to tar me with that brush. Good day, sir. Talk to me when you are not willing to put words into my mouth as if you were some sort of garden variety troll.

35 posted on 12/06/2011 10:02:59 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

“We’re better than Democrats because we don’t tolerate liars and cheats in our mist.”

My use of the word “you” refers to your collective use of the word “we”.

I can see that you are looking for any excuse to duck out of this conversation, much as you did in your second post to me yesterday. If you say you don’t support Newt, that’s fine, and I believe you. Sadly, you fail to see what was done to Herman, and the evidence of that is in your comments regarding him.

I’m no troll, I am simply here to speak the truth, especially to those who don’t want to hear it or acknowledge it. I know truth hurts, and I think it’s going to hurt even more as the right travels further down this road.

Don’t listen to the guy on the side of the road telling you you’ve taken a wrong turn, just continue on.


36 posted on 12/06/2011 10:20:01 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: chris37
I can see that you are looking for any excuse to duck out of this conversation...

If you wish to see it that way. I prefer to see it as refusing to engage in a conversation with someone who practices any number of similar logical fallacies in an attempt to gain an upper hand. Yes, I did "duck out" yesterday, I was hoping you'd knock off the BS today, but to no avail. Your loss. No wait...you win!

Whatevah.

37 posted on 12/06/2011 10:35:18 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (To Obama, bipartisanship is giving the opposition the opportunity to do as they are told. (WGensert))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

No, I don’t win.

We all lost.

Goodbye.


38 posted on 12/06/2011 10:54:43 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Gingrich saw his image further damaged in 1997 when he was fined $300,000 for ethics violations. After a disappointing Republican showing in the 1998 election, Gingrich resigned the Speakership and his seat in Congress.

Read more: Newt Gingrich Biography (U.S. Representative) — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/biography/var/newtgingrich.html#ixzz1ft8YVfDy


39 posted on 12/07/2011 2:08:55 PM PST by chainsaw (Sarah Palin would be my first choice. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson