Skip to comments.Newt fires back at Pelosi: Bring it on!
Posted on 12/05/2011 12:16:16 PM PST by TBBT
Newt today said that if Pelosi wants to disclose information about himself from when she was on the ethics committee, that the House should immediately file charges against her as that is a violation of the rules of the House:
First of all Id like to thank Speaker Pelosi for what I regard as an early Christmas gift. If shes suggesting shes gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.
Heres the full clip:
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.
Do you really know something the rest of us don't, or have you allowed the leftists to convince you that the way to earn the respect of your peers is to spout off crazy nasty garbage?
“You mention ‘extortion’ again, and I’ll have your legs broken.”
I’m sure we can arrange for a nice honorarium from the Student Fund.
Now its time to tank Newt....to warm us all up for the Mittster.
Welcome to the United Soviet States of America..where the Pravda State Media vet the candidates to the pleasure and needs of the RinoCrat UniParty.
This election will be a non-election...featuring the state approved candidates-whose only distinction is whether they are black or white.
What’s tiring is defending Gingrich. Can you honestly tell me you think he’s conservative or he would be a good president? I’ve seen your posts, your a conservative. You shouldn’t be supporting someone like that.
Good grief! That picture scared the crap out of me. I have to go grab a beer.
Why did he do the ad and why did he fall for global warming in the first place?
Why always running around yakking about, the planet this, the planet that, the entire planet, blah blah.
What happened to “the United States of America”, Newt?
Why wasn’t that good enough for you?
My candidate never fell for global warming, not even once, not even close.
Most of the candiates didn’t, and Pawlenty even apologized for being duped.
“They” is the opposition - liberals, MSM and Democrat politicians and party. The ‘what’ is whatever Newt thinks “they” don’t know about. Arrogance...same arrogance that Cain had in thinking what ever innocent dealings he had with women....
The point is the real ‘what’ doesn’t matter. It is the accusation and hounding......
Regardless, my personal suspicion is where there are three marriages, there are other things not yet aired... Sad but true.
You want to go back to the days of Republicans like Gerald Ford and John Paul Stevens? When Republicans knew they were a permanent minority and set in the corner and behaved themselves?
Newt has never won a fight in his life.
Newt helped lead a conservative movement that in November of 1994 dealt the Democrats the worst electoral defeat in American history. Newt was elected Speaker of the House of the incoming Congress in 1995. As Charlie Sheen would put it, "Winning!"
Clinton ran laps around him.
The reason you think it makes you seem smart and cool to repeat leftist propaganda is because you are weak and stupid.
Madame Bitch has already implicated herself to the point this probably won't fly.
Wake up about Newt and do what? Vote for whom?
No, sanctimonious and holier than thou
It will probably take more than one beer...
One day I hope to see Pelosi in an orange jumpsuit in federal penitentiary. Or even better, turned over to the people to serve justice on her.
The American people caused that in 1994. Soon after, Gingrich threw us under a bus.
Or, perhaps, a leftist...
Which of the 84 charges against Neut as speaker should we start with?
You post garbage.
The same American people who voted in the Republican Congress in 1994 had just two years previously elected Clinton.
The difference was leadership and Newt had a big hand in providing that.
Clinton was saved by the liberal media and the liberal republicans in the Senate. Got that? The RINOs stopped Clinton from being removed from Office. Newt impeached Clinton — Newt is still the man!
why doesn’t Newt just tell us what the ethics committee was investigating?
Oh it’s all coming out. No question about that.
If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.
35 posted on Monday, December 05, 2011 3:31:27 PM by Semper911
—— why don’t you google it. It’s like ancient history. He says in the clip that he was accused of 85 ethics violations (He was Palinized before Sarah was) and was cleared of all but one... which was an oversight on his part.
No he is not. What Newt is doing is pointing out that there are rules and agreements in this world and that Pelosi is threatening to violate some of them.
Correct. So she DOES have some dirt on Newt. And she would be willing to fall on her sword and get sanctioned by the House (if it came to that) and release the dirt.
And Newt kisses his campaign bye-bye.
I will spend the rest of my life trying to get that image out of my brain - thank you. Thank you so bloody much!@
And here all that time I listened to Nancy talking about “the politics of personal destruction” I thought she was COMPLAINING about it...
I don't understand why the ethics committee didn't investigate san fran nan for the "We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it" comment.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree as this spawn of the crooked D'Alesandro family proves over and over.
The D'Alesandros were to Baltimore what the Daley's are to Chicago. See thread:
Since you obviously haven't noticed, I'll go ahead and point out to you that Free Republic is not a Republican Party site. It is an independent conservative site. Says so right on the top of the home page:
"Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!"
You should be banned for that.
Actually I think that pic can help me lose some weight, everytime I feel like eating all I have to do is look at that pic....problem solved.
To nickcarraway: Newt Gingrich does not “think” he’s intelligent, he flat-out KNOWS he is. And he is certainly FAR more intelligent than Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, or YOU.
Take your little Newt Hate Fest elsewhere, troll.
Then go for it. I’m sticking by what I wrote in my earlier post.
You do see that it will not matter because nobody will do a thing about it.
She won’t leak it until close to the election if Newt is nominated.
Nobody has done anything about Maxine Waters, have they?
How do you get socialist from someone who does something for money?That is called a capitalists anywhere else.Well then I guess people like you will just take their marbles home and re elect Obama.Wonderful “senseful” idea NOT.
Thanks, Walrus. I’m so sick of the GOP Cannibalism. Yeah, I supporting Newt, but ya know, like it’s been said—anyone on that debate stage is 1000% better than Barak Hussein Obama.
And as far as I’m concerned (after a really great glass of chardonnay), if you’re a Newt hater, and smarter than the rest of us, well shove it.
Newt & Nancy - Lovers Spat
“her little Starkist Tuna escapade “
I remember her as Speaker shepherding an increase in the minimum wage law which applied to all U.S. territories except Guam - site of one of her fishing warehouses.
But then again, she doesn’t have to worry about that Catholic ‘conscience’ thing. Amazing what illegalities you can get away with if you don’t have one.
Oh and thank you for pointing out my blindness. I might never have noticed that the Conservative site I occasionally post on, is in fact dominated by Conservatives.
Sadly, I didn’t know so many of them were as self-rightous as you.
Obama care is the law of the land and she did he part to force the damn thing through Congress. Pilosi is one of smartest in the dunce pool and the dunce pool consists of one unholy multitude.
Clinton never manipulated Newt. Newt pushed him to a balanced budget, welfare reform and several other legitimate Conservative points. He has a 90% rating from the ACU. He has a 98.6% Lifetime Pro-Life Rating from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).
Newt has his faults, mostly due to his having a fertile mind with lots of ideas he is open to discussing. He does so in public and as ideas are explored opinions change. The fact that someone can't alter his point of view is absurd.
Had ANYBODY but Bob Dole run against Clinton, & had
Perot not run, Clinton would have never been reelected. He won two elections and never won a majority of the electorate, far from it!
Enough of your trolling all posts Gingrich to constantly bad mouth him, We get it.
I am not a huge fan of Gingrich as President, but Cain flamed out. He didn't know how to fight back. He also was his own worst enemy by not being marginally informed with foreign policy. Bachman was high and now is low. She either wins Iowa or is done. She also has problems with employees as well. Santorum hasn't caught on and it doesn't look like he will. Romney is a non starter with 75% of the Republican electorate.
If Gingrich wins the nomination, he did so by earning it. I, and MOST Americans couldn’t give a flip about his personal life, Clinton has made that passe.
“Whats tiring is defending Gingrich.”
Oh yeah. You must be exhausted. Defendin’ is hard work. LMFAO.
She even cackles.
I don't need to Google it. I was a news junkey back then too, and I remember full well what happened. And I couldn't care less.
It doesn't matter what the facts are. Don't you see? The MSM will paint a picture of him that has nothing to do with the facts. They are already trying.
And the masses, who are not news junkies like us, will believe it. See also: Sarah Palin.
I agree. Would like to see the info now instead of October of 2012.
I'm sick and tired of Washington Kabuki.
What is with FR these days. Lots of angry comments.
I know what is in the public record; but obviously, Pelosi was referring to closed door meetings and dirt she has on Newt. Plus if everything the committee discusses is public record, why would Newt want charges filed against Pelosi for discussing it.
If there is anything fact or fiction, he needs to get it out before the dims “Cain” him....
“It doesn’t matter what the facts are. Don’t you see? The MSM will paint a picture of him that has nothing to do with the facts. They are already trying.”
The facts might not matter to you, but they very much matter to the rest of us. What you are saying is that we should just lay down and accept the MSM version of history and let them drain our support from our most viable candidate.
You should be ashamed of your postion. That’s exactly what they did to Cain. Difference is, Newt will fight. For himself and for us.
B#!ch slapping the B#!ch. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.