Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt fires back at Pelosi: Bring it on!
The Right Scoop ^ | 12/5/2011 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 12/05/2011 12:16:16 PM PST by TBBT

Newt today said that if Pelosi wants to disclose information about himself from when she was on the ethics committee, that the House should immediately file charges against her as that is a violation of the rules of the House:

First of all I’d like to thank Speaker Pelosi for what I regard as an early Christmas gift. If she’s suggesting she’s gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.

Here’s the full clip:

(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dims; dumbocrats; evilrat; gingrich; newt; pelosi; pelosiisasnake; ratpelosi; rats; stretch; stretchpelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last
To: Semper911
Oh it's all coming out. No question about that.

If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.

Do you really know something the rest of us don't, or have you allowed the leftists to convince you that the way to earn the respect of your peers is to spout off crazy nasty garbage?

101 posted on 12/05/2011 1:00:10 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“You mention ‘extortion’ again, and I’ll have your legs broken.”

I’m sure we can arrange for a nice honorarium from the Student Fund.


102 posted on 12/05/2011 1:00:56 PM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Mittt Romney - he lacks the courage of his absence of convictions .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Now its time to tank Newt....to warm us all up for the Mittster.

Welcome to the United Soviet States of America..where the Pravda State Media “vet” the candidates to the pleasure and needs of the RinoCrat UniParty.

This “election” will be a non-election...featuring the state approved “candidates”-whose only distinction is whether they are black or white.


103 posted on 12/05/2011 1:01:53 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

What’s tiring is defending Gingrich. Can you honestly tell me you think he’s conservative or he would be a good president? I’ve seen your posts, your a conservative. You shouldn’t be supporting someone like that.


104 posted on 12/05/2011 1:01:53 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Good grief! That picture scared the crap out of me. I have to go grab a beer.


105 posted on 12/05/2011 1:02:17 PM PST by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Why did he do the ad and why did he fall for global warming in the first place?

Why always running around yakking about, the planet this, the planet that, the entire planet, blah blah.

What happened to “the United States of America”, Newt?

Why wasn’t that good enough for you?

My candidate never fell for global warming, not even once, not even close.

Most of the candiates didn’t, and Pawlenty even apologized for being duped.


106 posted on 12/05/2011 1:03:23 PM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

“They” is the opposition - liberals, MSM and Democrat politicians and party. The ‘what’ is whatever Newt thinks “they” don’t know about. Arrogance...same arrogance that Cain had in thinking what ever innocent dealings he had with women....

The point is the real ‘what’ doesn’t matter. It is the accusation and hounding......

Regardless, my personal suspicion is where there are three marriages, there are other things not yet aired... Sad but true.


107 posted on 12/05/2011 1:03:49 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

You want to go back to the days of Republicans like Gerald Ford and John Paul Stevens? When Republicans knew they were a permanent minority and set in the corner and behaved themselves?


108 posted on 12/05/2011 1:05:15 PM PST by nickcarraway (I will not support Gingrich/Chafee or Romney/Pawlenty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Godzilla
“Pelosi will be walking stright into a chainsaw, just like Pickett at Gettysburg. Marching straight at Newt’s strong point” Your history reference says it all. The old timers are willing to forget about past. The attacks on Newt will be aimed at the vast majority who are under 60 and don't have a clue who this guy is. Newt is McCain redo with out the respect for his military service If the gezzers and the Mormon haters put Newt up as the candidate , the senate will be out of reach. Younger people and indies will see Him as the face of the Republican Party. Sadly they will be correct.
109 posted on 12/05/2011 1:06:38 PM PST by fantom (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
You say stupid things.

Newt has never won a fight in his life.

Newt helped lead a conservative movement that in November of 1994 dealt the Democrats the worst electoral defeat in American history. Newt was elected Speaker of the House of the incoming Congress in 1995. As Charlie Sheen would put it, "Winning!"

Clinton ran laps around him.

The reason you think it makes you seem smart and cool to repeat leftist propaganda is because you are weak and stupid.

110 posted on 12/05/2011 1:07:35 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

111 posted on 12/05/2011 1:08:07 PM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
She will simply leak the info "anonymously". She will do whatever she wants and will not be held accountable.

Madame Bitch has already implicated herself to the point this probably won't fly.

112 posted on 12/05/2011 1:09:02 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
I wish more people would wake up about him.

Wake up about Newt and do what? Vote for whom?

113 posted on 12/05/2011 1:10:10 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

No, sanctimonious and holier than thou


114 posted on 12/05/2011 1:12:45 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

It will probably take more than one beer...


115 posted on 12/05/2011 1:12:53 PM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

One day I hope to see Pelosi in an orange jumpsuit in federal penitentiary. Or even better, turned over to the people to serve justice on her.


116 posted on 12/05/2011 1:13:24 PM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

The American people caused that in 1994. Soon after, Gingrich threw us under a bus.


117 posted on 12/05/2011 1:14:04 PM PST by nickcarraway (I will not support Gingrich/Chafee or Romney/Pawlenty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Or, perhaps, a leftist...


118 posted on 12/05/2011 1:14:49 PM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: martinidon

Which of the 84 charges against Neut as speaker should we start with?


119 posted on 12/05/2011 1:16:20 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The American people caused that in 1994.

You post garbage.

The same American people who voted in the Republican Congress in 1994 had just two years previously elected Clinton.

The difference was leadership and Newt had a big hand in providing that.

120 posted on 12/05/2011 1:20:17 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
That is Newt in a nutshell. I wish more people would wake up about him. He is a dunce.

Bump

121 posted on 12/05/2011 1:20:17 PM PST by nickcarraway (I will not support Gingrich/Chafee or Romney/Pawlenty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Clinton was saved by the liberal media and the liberal republicans in the Senate. Got that? The RINOs stopped Clinton from being removed from Office. Newt impeached Clinton — Newt is still the man!


122 posted on 12/05/2011 1:20:47 PM PST by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

why doesn’t Newt just tell us what the ethics committee was investigating?
Oh it’s all coming out. No question about that.

If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.

35 posted on Monday, December 05, 2011 3:31:27 PM by Semper911

—— why don’t you google it. It’s like ancient history. He says in the clip that he was accused of 85 ethics violations (He was Palinized before Sarah was) and was cleared of all but one... which was an oversight on his part.


123 posted on 12/05/2011 1:24:27 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

No he is not. What Newt is doing is pointing out that there are rules and agreements in this world and that Pelosi is threatening to violate some of them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Correct. So she DOES have some dirt on Newt. And she would be willing to fall on her sword and get sanctioned by the House (if it came to that) and release the dirt.

And Newt kisses his campaign bye-bye.


124 posted on 12/05/2011 1:25:04 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I will spend the rest of my life trying to get that image out of my brain - thank you. Thank you so bloody much!@


125 posted on 12/05/2011 1:27:05 PM PST by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

And here all that time I listened to Nancy talking about “the politics of personal destruction” I thought she was COMPLAINING about it...


126 posted on 12/05/2011 1:29:36 PM PST by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
If she’s suggesting she’s gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee,

I don't understand why the ethics committee didn't investigate san fran nan for the "We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it" comment.

127 posted on 12/05/2011 1:31:36 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
"Pelosi is acting like a mafioso - ...

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree as this spawn of the crooked D'Alesandro family proves over and over.

The D'Alesandros were to Baltimore what the Daley's are to Chicago. See thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1757907/posts

128 posted on 12/05/2011 1:32:04 PM PST by In Maryland ("If stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?" - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: navymom1
Why do you assume everyone here is GOP?

Since you obviously haven't noticed, I'll go ahead and point out to you that Free Republic is not a Republican Party site. It is an independent conservative site. Says so right on the top of the home page:

"Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!"

129 posted on 12/05/2011 1:33:18 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

You should be banned for that.


130 posted on 12/05/2011 1:33:22 PM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Actually I think that pic can help me lose some weight, everytime I feel like eating all I have to do is look at that pic....problem solved.


131 posted on 12/05/2011 1:34:35 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

To nickcarraway: Newt Gingrich does not “think” he’s intelligent, he flat-out KNOWS he is. And he is certainly FAR more intelligent than Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, or YOU.

Take your little Newt Hate Fest elsewhere, troll.


132 posted on 12/05/2011 1:36:12 PM PST by Walrus (Big media is the natural enemy of liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Then go for it. I’m sticking by what I wrote in my earlier post.


133 posted on 12/05/2011 1:36:28 PM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

You do see that it will not matter because nobody will do a thing about it.

She won’t leak it until close to the election if Newt is nominated.

Nobody has done anything about Maxine Waters, have they?


134 posted on 12/05/2011 1:38:33 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How do you get socialist from someone who does something for money?That is called a capitalists anywhere else.Well then I guess people like you will just take their marbles home and re elect Obama.Wonderful “senseful” idea NOT.


135 posted on 12/05/2011 1:39:10 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Thanks, Walrus. I’m so sick of the GOP Cannibalism. Yeah, I supporting Newt, but ya know, like it’s been said—anyone on that debate stage is 1000% better than Barak Hussein Obama.

And as far as I’m concerned (after a really great glass of chardonnay), if you’re a Newt hater, and smarter than the rest of us, well shove it.


136 posted on 12/05/2011 1:39:46 PM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Newt & Nancy - Lovers Spat


137 posted on 12/05/2011 1:40:06 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

“her little Starkist Tuna escapade “

I remember her as Speaker shepherding an increase in the minimum wage law which applied to all U.S. territories except Guam - site of one of her fishing warehouses.

But then again, she doesn’t have to worry about that Catholic ‘conscience’ thing. Amazing what illegalities you can get away with if you don’t have one.


138 posted on 12/05/2011 1:41:09 PM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Oh and thank you for pointing out my blindness. I might never have noticed that the Conservative site I occasionally post on, is in fact dominated by Conservatives.

Sadly, I didn’t know so many of them were as self-rightous as you.


139 posted on 12/05/2011 1:42:29 PM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Pelosi is a dunce.

Obama care is the law of the land and she did he part to force the damn thing through Congress. Pilosi is one of smartest in the dunce pool and the dunce pool consists of one unholy multitude.

140 posted on 12/05/2011 1:55:35 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Alright, We get the point. You don't like Newt. Enough already with your hyperbolic Horse $h!t!

Clinton never manipulated Newt. Newt pushed him to a balanced budget, welfare reform and several other legitimate Conservative points. He has a 90% rating from the ACU. He has a 98.6% Lifetime Pro-Life Rating from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC).

Newt has his faults, mostly due to his having a fertile mind with lots of ideas he is open to discussing. He does so in public and as ideas are explored opinions change. The fact that someone can't alter his point of view is absurd.

Had ANYBODY but Bob Dole run against Clinton, & had
Perot not run, Clinton would have never been reelected. He won two elections and never won a majority of the electorate, far from it!

Enough of your trolling all posts Gingrich to constantly bad mouth him, We get it.

I am not a huge fan of Gingrich as President, but Cain flamed out. He didn't know how to fight back. He also was his own worst enemy by not being marginally informed with foreign policy. Bachman was high and now is low. She either wins Iowa or is done. She also has problems with employees as well. Santorum hasn't caught on and it doesn't look like he will. Romney is a non starter with 75% of the Republican electorate.

If Gingrich wins the nomination, he did so by earning it. I, and MOST Americans couldn’t give a flip about his personal life, Clinton has made that passe.

141 posted on 12/05/2011 1:56:32 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“What’s tiring is defending Gingrich.”

Oh yeah. You must be exhausted. Defendin’ is hard work. LMFAO.


142 posted on 12/05/2011 1:57:34 PM PST by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: oyez

She even cackles.


143 posted on 12/05/2011 2:00:18 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
— why don’t you google it. It’s like ancient history.

I don't need to Google it. I was a news junkey back then too, and I remember full well what happened. And I couldn't care less.

It doesn't matter what the facts are. Don't you see? The MSM will paint a picture of him that has nothing to do with the facts. They are already trying.

And the masses, who are not news junkies like us, will believe it. See also: Sarah Palin.

144 posted on 12/05/2011 2:01:57 PM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: martinidon

I agree. Would like to see the info now instead of October of 2012.


145 posted on 12/05/2011 2:05:24 PM PST by ChiefJayStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Exactly! If this weren't an act, he'd keep his yap shut and let her violate ethics committee rules. Then she's done.

I'm sick and tired of Washington Kabuki.

146 posted on 12/05/2011 2:06:04 PM PST by liberalh8ter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBBT; All
It's good to see Newt returning fire at that demented beeotch, and while I'm disappointed that Herman Cain is no longer in the race, I'm reminded of former SecDef Donald Rumsfeld who said "You go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time."

That is the bottom line at this particular point in time.

Sure, we would all like to have a more conservative candidate, however we are now faced with four basic candidates:

Mitt-Witt Romney = absoeffinlutely NO WAY(might as well vote for 0bama)

Newt Gingrich = looks to be the big dawg to beat.

Rick Perry = shows few signs of rebounding.

Rick Santorum = shows no sign of bounding.

Michele Bachmann = IF she could just get some traction, and had she avoided that joker Ed Rollins...

Jon Huntsman = Toke up if you think he's got a chance.

Ron Paul = The man of the year. Unfortunately, that year was 1901.

That's how I see it. YMMV.
147 posted on 12/05/2011 2:06:05 PM PST by mkjessup ("Newt is like Last Chance Texaco before Romneyville" w/credit to WARDADDY! Booya!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
“You are either a moron or a liar.”

What is with FR these days. Lots of angry comments.

I know what is in the public record; but obviously, Pelosi was referring to closed door meetings and dirt she has on Newt. Plus if everything the committee discusses is public record, why would Newt want charges filed against Pelosi for discussing it.

If there is anything fact or fiction, he needs to get it out before the dims “Cain” him....

148 posted on 12/05/2011 2:06:53 PM PST by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

“It doesn’t matter what the facts are. Don’t you see? The MSM will paint a picture of him that has nothing to do with the facts. They are already trying.”

The facts might not matter to you, but they very much matter to the rest of us. What you are saying is that we should just lay down and accept the MSM version of history and let them drain our support from our most viable candidate.

You should be ashamed of your postion. That’s exactly what they did to Cain. Difference is, Newt will fight. For himself and for us.


149 posted on 12/05/2011 2:07:10 PM PST by Raebie (WS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

B#!ch slapping the B#!ch. :-)


150 posted on 12/05/2011 2:07:54 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson