Skip to comments.Newt fires back at Pelosi: Bring it on!
Posted on 12/05/2011 12:16:16 PM PST by TBBT
Newt today said that if Pelosi wants to disclose information about himself from when she was on the ethics committee, that the House should immediately file charges against her as that is a violation of the rules of the House:
First of all Id like to thank Speaker Pelosi for what I regard as an early Christmas gift. If shes suggesting shes gonna use material she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.
Heres the full clip:
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
Can't see the video (at work). Hopefully somebody can fill me in.
Let us be honest Natzi Pelosi is not a thinker.
Gingrich is either in bed with Pelosi, or he's too stupid for words to have paretnered with her and given her everything, and have her backstab him. If Gingrich is the nominee his candidacy will set the GOP back 50 years. He could actually give the Dems huge majorities in both houses.
Rules don't apply to Democrats.
You KNOW that.
If anything, I’d like to see ALL the dirt on Pelosi
“And you will NOT ‘get my little dog too’, Nanzi!”
Pelosi is a dunce.
Pelosi on an ethics committee is almost as absurd as Jamie Gorelick on the 911 commission.
Let’s be honest, neither is Newt. He thinks he’s intelligent, which means it’s easy for people to manipulate him because he craves respect. That’s why Clinton, Pelosi, etc. used him like a puppet.
Now that’s what I’m talking about.
The one thing we need to beat Obama is an articulate, fighter who is not intimidated or afraid to push back against the left wing media-Democrat complex.
They prefer a couch.
Newt will NOT be newt-ered by the reigning regime.
Maybe he can teach a course on how it’s done to our
Republican “representatives” in Washington.
It’s a wondrous thing to behold.
It will get out and Pelosi will merely claim that someone else did it.
Nobody will do a thing about it because they never do.
pelosi thinks that Newt will wilt just like the others, problem is she is playing right into Newts hands if she tries to pull ethics violations details on him. In doing so SHE would be subject to ethics violations herself, and I’m sure Newt has plenty of bay mud on the princess pelosi to add to the mix. As stupid raw political power move that Newt will use to mop the floor with democrats.
This is one of Newt’s strong points. He fights back and has a spine. Bring it on Nancy. Hahahahaha.
Newt’s got balls
Isn’t he just admitting that she’s got dirt on him? Sit on the couch with her again, Newt. Or it could just be an organized plan to insure that Mitt takes the spot. I’m beginning to wonder if Gingrich is a choice or a red herring.
Don’t be an ignoramus. Pelosi has just given Newt the ammunition to blow her out of the water. When he counterattacks, believe me, he counterattacks.
The Larry Flynt party.
Arrogance. Complete arrogance....he didn’t suspect they had the goods on him with his ‘Calista’, and he doesn’t suspect they know anything else he’s hiding.
Gingrich didn’t give Pelosi anything. He was long out of office when he agreed to do that ‘friendly’ advertisement.
Pelosi is acting like a mafioso - with cryptic threats of blackmail. By not acting like a victim - Newt wins this fight against the corrupt backstabber and loser that Pelosi is.
She is digging her own grave- Newt just needs to shove her in it.
“He could actually give the Dems huge majorities in both houses.”
He takes them, not gives them. Skip your history classes?
Incidentally, by saying what she did Pelosi inadvertently helped Gingrich to distance himself from his earlier fraternizing with her.
Summary for those who can’t see the video:
Newt says if Nancy releases anything from the Ethics Committee she should be immediately investigated by the House.
Newt is kicking you-know-what and taking names! Pelosi’s blowing smoke and some of the folks around here scatter for the bushes to hide. If they had ANYTHING more on Newt they would have used it in the first campaign to destroy him. They have nothing.
Newt is a fighter. He’s going to take it directly to the other side.
So why did he do that ad with Pelosi?
I thought that as well.. that it’d be a violation of House rules to release that kind of info.
Be that as it may, one thing the detestable Pelosi is indeed forgetting... Newt Gingrich relishes a mudfight, and will be quite willing to deliver back to his attackers.
So go for it, Wicked Bitch of the West... bring it!
Actually I hope it sets us back about 30 years. That would be nice.
Oh it's all coming out. No question about that.
If he is the nominee, we are so screwed.
Already discussed on FR threads ad nauseum.
Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. Following an investigation by the House Ethics Committee Gingrich was sanctioned US$300,000. Gingrich acknowledged in January 1997 that “In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete and unreliable statements were given to the committee”.  The House Ethics Committee concluded that inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented “intentional or ... reckless” disregard of House rules. Special Counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated and left that issue up to the IRS. In 1999, the IRS cleared the organizations connected with the “Renewing American Civilization” courses under investigation for possible tax violations.
GO Newt! Come out swinging every time they try this stuff! Voters are sick of it.
Until now. It stopped with Gingrich...he bites back. He may have his warts, but he doesn't play.
I think he just did. If there was anything real they would have hanged him.
Now Pelosi says they held back for a later date? What is the meaning of that?
Sorry, I am a conservative. I am one those, “evil rightwing social engineers” that Gingrich said was the greatest threat to our country earlier this year. I am not supporting the Rpmney/Gingrich axis no matter what anyone says. Why would you support someone who hates you?
Newt has never won a fight in his life. Clinton ran laps around him. And Pelosi knew what she was doing in 2006. How can you defend his total surrender to him?
That is Newt in a nutshell. I wish more people would wake up about him. He is a dunce.
Oh man...that is a cruel thing to post.
Ditto. It's mano-a-mano now.. Gingrich relishes the coming brawl.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.