Posted on 12/06/2011 1:41:00 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
Newt Gingrich has dominent leads among Republican voters in both North Carolina and Colorado.
In fact, Gingrich is the first candidate outside of his or her home state that PPP has ever found with an actual majority of the primary vote in any one state.
(Excerpt) Read more at publicpolicypolling.com ...
I heard if she leaked them she would be brought up on charges
” he’s still avoiding interviews, avoiding answering questions,”
same as obambi and know one pays attention
Great news!!!!!!!!!!!! Newt is also gaining Tea Party Support, UP in Fla and SC and even in Romney’s backyard. Bet the talking heads on Fox News and the MSM are spinning like a top.
“Gingrich and Romney are virtually identical in my book no as well. Gingrich=Romney=McCain=Dole They are all pretty much the same. I admire much about every one of them but they are all flawed deeply philosophically.
I’ll take Bachman, Santorum or Perry.”
Blows my mind! Gingrich is far from perfect, but certainly far more conservative than Perry or Romney.
Romeny, we all know what he is. Perry, he supports a dream act in his state and runs high deficits. Gingrich is the last Speaker to balance a Federal budget.
My Rino beats your Rino....wooo um hooo
He balanced the budget? thats like so 15 years ago...just today he says
GINGRICH: Well, it depends on what you’re subsidizing. The idea of having economic incentives for manufacturing goes back to Alexander Hamilton’s first report of manufacturing which I believe was 1791. We have always had a bias in favor of investing in the future. We built the transcontinental railroads that way. The Erie Canal was built that way. We’ve always believed that having a strong infrastructure and having a strong energy system are net advantages because they’ve made us richer and more powerful than any country in the world. But what I object to is subsidizing things that don’t work and things that aren’t creating a better future. And the problem with the modern welfare state is it actually encourages people to the wrong behaviors, encourages them not to work, encourages them not to study.
good look with that balanced budget with this version of newt
Right. Newt and Mitt are polar opposites!
Mitt is a pro-abortion, big government progressive.
Newt is a pro-life, budget balancing Reaganite who helped usher in the Republican majority, the Reagan Revolution and the long lasting Reagan economy.
Mitt’s legacy is RomneyCare, taxpayer funded abortion, gay marriage, liberal activist judges, an all but destroyed Republican brand in Massachusetts and a bankrupt state. And he’s proud of it.
I have no problem with Bachmann, Santorum or Perry, other than they can’t seem to get out of the gates or stay long on the track without stumbling and taking hard falls. Wouldn’t trust Trump other than cheer leader.
Unlike McCain, I believe Newt is capable and unafraid to take the fight to the enemy and win! And that’s what we need.
Well, tax incentives are sometimes useful to spur economic development—if not overdone. Would be nice to have a tax problem in manufacturing for a change. That would mean we’re making some headway.
Sorry sir. It’s your site. I just disagree with your analysis.
Did I misstate the actual record?
bump :)
PS.
I will vote and work hard for the nominee. Unless maybe it is Ron Paul. LOL
I agree with your analysis and love Free Republic. Thanks for all that you do to promote freedom and liberty in these United States of America!
I think Bachmann might have trouble being re-elected to Congress.
I want him to take the fight to the enemy and stomp his friggin guts out and feed em to the buzzards.
But that's just me. And a few million of my friends.
Not true at all. There are tons of differences. I don't have time to educate you, so please do some research to educate yourself.
Newt Ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.